Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?

Introduction: Steinstrasse (SS) is a known complication of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Although the majority of SS clears spontaneously, about 6% require intervention. This study was carried out to identify the factors that determine the need for intervention in SS. Materials and Methods: This was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chandan Phukan, T J Nirmal, Cornerstone V Wann, J Chandrasingh, Santosh Kumar, Nitin S Kekre, Antony Devasia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=51;epage=54;aulast=Phukan
_version_ 1811334084536827904
author Chandan Phukan
T J Nirmal
Cornerstone V Wann
J Chandrasingh
Santosh Kumar
Nitin S Kekre
Antony Devasia
author_facet Chandan Phukan
T J Nirmal
Cornerstone V Wann
J Chandrasingh
Santosh Kumar
Nitin S Kekre
Antony Devasia
author_sort Chandan Phukan
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Steinstrasse (SS) is a known complication of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Although the majority of SS clears spontaneously, about 6% require intervention. This study was carried out to identify the factors that determine the need for intervention in SS. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who developed steinstrasse following SWL at our center. They were divided into two groups: a) Those cleared spontaneously and b) Those required intervention. The two groups were compared with regard to demographic profile, stone factors and factors related to steinstrasse. Results: Out of 2436 cases of SWL, 89 (3%) formed steinstrasse. The majority of the patients (35%) who required intervention had stone sizes of 10-14 mm. Coptcoat type III steinstrasse required significantly more interventions for clearance (P = 0.001). The site and the size of the SS was not a predictor of intervention for SS. Conclusions: Early intervention is warranted in patients with steinstrasse where the lead fragment is >5 mm (Coptcoat type III).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:02:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a21e4123094e45c4a91a6bf545499bd2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:02:29Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Urology Annals
spelling doaj.art-a21e4123094e45c4a91a6bf545499bd22022-12-22T02:38:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342017-01-0191515410.4103/0974-7796.198870Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?Chandan PhukanT J NirmalCornerstone V WannJ ChandrasinghSantosh KumarNitin S KekreAntony DevasiaIntroduction: Steinstrasse (SS) is a known complication of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Although the majority of SS clears spontaneously, about 6% require intervention. This study was carried out to identify the factors that determine the need for intervention in SS. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who developed steinstrasse following SWL at our center. They were divided into two groups: a) Those cleared spontaneously and b) Those required intervention. The two groups were compared with regard to demographic profile, stone factors and factors related to steinstrasse. Results: Out of 2436 cases of SWL, 89 (3%) formed steinstrasse. The majority of the patients (35%) who required intervention had stone sizes of 10-14 mm. Coptcoat type III steinstrasse required significantly more interventions for clearance (P = 0.001). The site and the size of the SS was not a predictor of intervention for SS. Conclusions: Early intervention is warranted in patients with steinstrasse where the lead fragment is >5 mm (Coptcoat type III).http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=51;epage=54;aulast=PhukanInterventionsshock wave lithotripsysteinstrasse
spellingShingle Chandan Phukan
T J Nirmal
Cornerstone V Wann
J Chandrasingh
Santosh Kumar
Nitin S Kekre
Antony Devasia
Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?
Urology Annals
Interventions
shock wave lithotripsy
steinstrasse
title Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?
title_full Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?
title_fullStr Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?
title_full_unstemmed Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?
title_short Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?
title_sort can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy
topic Interventions
shock wave lithotripsy
steinstrasse
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=51;epage=54;aulast=Phukan
work_keys_str_mv AT chandanphukan canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy
AT tjnirmal canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy
AT cornerstonevwann canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy
AT jchandrasingh canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy
AT santoshkumar canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy
AT nitinskekre canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy
AT antonydevasia canwepredicttheneedforinterventioninsteinstrassefollowingshockwavelithotripsy