The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State?
Privatization, a well-known Neoliberal strategy, is transforming the human services in both Europe and the US. Scholars have studied its impact on clients, the hollowed out welfare state, and the economic slowdown. Few have examined how privatization within agencies – better known as Managerialism/N...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Social Work & Society
2019-04-01
|
| Series: | Social Work and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/562 |
| _version_ | 1819282146533048320 |
|---|---|
| author | Mimi Abramovitz Jennifer Zelnick |
| author_facet | Mimi Abramovitz Jennifer Zelnick |
| author_sort | Mimi Abramovitz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Privatization, a well-known Neoliberal strategy, is transforming the human services in both Europe and the US. Scholars have studied its impact on clients, the hollowed out welfare state, and the economic slowdown. Few have examined how privatization within agencies – better known as Managerialism/New Public Management--affects service provision, the organization of work, and the well being of the workforce.
Filling this gap this research: 1) describes three overlapping historical phases of privatization in US human services: Marketization, Managerialism and Financialization; 2) analyzes how 3000 front line workers view the impact of Managerialism in their agencies, and 3) applies the lens of race to the findings.
An anonymous electronic survey was distributed 3000 NYC human service workers in collaboration with five major human service organizations, one union, and the NY Non Profit Press. Findings suggest that human service workers--mostly women and persons-of-color-- are deeply troubled by the pressure to increase productivity, accountability and efficiency; the focus on quantifiable outcomes, and the associated dwindling of advocacy and social justice. The implications for service quality, staff retention, professional autonomy, burnout, and structural racism are explored.
The finding should strengthen the voice of human service workers in the highly contested privatization debate and help to mobilize them for policy change in the welfare “service” state. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T01:10:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a223e3f0d26c4b898b3825eb69bf99b1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1613-8953 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T01:10:57Z |
| publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
| publisher | Social Work & Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Social Work and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-a223e3f0d26c4b898b3825eb69bf99b12022-12-21T17:22:59ZengSocial Work & SocietySocial Work and Society1613-89532019-04-01162The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State?Mimi Abramovitz0Jennifer Zelnick1Hunter College, New YorkTouro College, New YorkPrivatization, a well-known Neoliberal strategy, is transforming the human services in both Europe and the US. Scholars have studied its impact on clients, the hollowed out welfare state, and the economic slowdown. Few have examined how privatization within agencies – better known as Managerialism/New Public Management--affects service provision, the organization of work, and the well being of the workforce. Filling this gap this research: 1) describes three overlapping historical phases of privatization in US human services: Marketization, Managerialism and Financialization; 2) analyzes how 3000 front line workers view the impact of Managerialism in their agencies, and 3) applies the lens of race to the findings. An anonymous electronic survey was distributed 3000 NYC human service workers in collaboration with five major human service organizations, one union, and the NY Non Profit Press. Findings suggest that human service workers--mostly women and persons-of-color-- are deeply troubled by the pressure to increase productivity, accountability and efficiency; the focus on quantifiable outcomes, and the associated dwindling of advocacy and social justice. The implications for service quality, staff retention, professional autonomy, burnout, and structural racism are explored. The finding should strengthen the voice of human service workers in the highly contested privatization debate and help to mobilize them for policy change in the welfare “service” state.https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/562Privatisationmanagerialismfinancialisationhuman service workers |
| spellingShingle | Mimi Abramovitz Jennifer Zelnick The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State? Social Work and Society Privatisation managerialism financialisation human service workers |
| title | The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State? |
| title_full | The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State? |
| title_fullStr | The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State? |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State? |
| title_short | The Logic of The Market versus The Logic of Social Work: Whither the Welfare State? |
| title_sort | logic of the market versus the logic of social work whither the welfare state |
| topic | Privatisation managerialism financialisation human service workers |
| url | https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/562 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mimiabramovitz thelogicofthemarketversusthelogicofsocialworkwhitherthewelfarestate AT jenniferzelnick thelogicofthemarketversusthelogicofsocialworkwhitherthewelfarestate AT mimiabramovitz logicofthemarketversusthelogicofsocialworkwhitherthewelfarestate AT jenniferzelnick logicofthemarketversusthelogicofsocialworkwhitherthewelfarestate |