Evaluating combinations of diagnostic tests to discriminate different dementia types
Abstract Introduction We studied, using a data‐driven approach, how different combinations of diagnostic tests contribute to the differential diagnosis of dementia. Methods In this multicenter study, we included 356 patients with Alzheimer's disease, 87 frontotemporal dementia, 61 dementia with...
Main Authors: | Marie Bruun, Hanneke F.M. Rhodius‐Meester, Juha Koikkalainen, Marta Baroni, Le Gjerum, Afina W. Lemstra, Frederik Barkhof, Anne M. Remes, Timo Urhemaa, Antti Tolonen, Daniel Rueckert, Mark vanGils, Kristian S. Frederiksen, Gunhild Waldemar, Philip Scheltens, Patrizia Mecocci, Hilkka Soininen, Jyrki Lötjönen, Steen G. Hasselbalch, Wiesje M. van derFlier |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.07.003 |
Similar Items
-
Impact of a clinical decision support tool on prediction of progression in early-stage dementia: a prospective validation study
by: Marie Bruun, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Five-class differential diagnostics of neurodegenerative diseases using random undersampling boosting
by: Tong Tong, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Detecting frontotemporal dementia syndromes using MRI biomarkers
by: Marie Bruun, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Data-Driven Differential Diagnosis of Dementia Using Multiclass Disease State Index Classifier
by: Antti Tolonen, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Selection of memory clinic patients for CSF biomarker assessment can be restricted to a quarter of cases by using computerized decision support, without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
by: Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)