Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Aims Fluid congestion is a leading cause of hospital admission, readmission, and mortality in heart failure (HF). We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of an advanced fluid management programme (AFMP). The AFMP was defined as an intervention provi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgios Zisis, Amera Halabi, Quan Huynh, Christopher Neil, Melinda Carrington, Thomas H. Marwick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13510
_version_ 1818722412126011392
author Georgios Zisis
Amera Halabi
Quan Huynh
Christopher Neil
Melinda Carrington
Thomas H. Marwick
author_facet Georgios Zisis
Amera Halabi
Quan Huynh
Christopher Neil
Melinda Carrington
Thomas H. Marwick
author_sort Georgios Zisis
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Fluid congestion is a leading cause of hospital admission, readmission, and mortality in heart failure (HF). We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of an advanced fluid management programme (AFMP). The AFMP was defined as an intervention providing tailored diuretic therapy guided by intravascular volume assessment, in hospitalized patients or after discharge. The AFMP group was compared with patients who received standard care treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the effectiveness of an AFMP in improving patient outcomes. Methods and results A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, case–control studies, and crossover studies using the terms ‘heart failure’, ‘fluid management’, and ‘readmission’ was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus up until November 2020. Studies reporting the association of an AFMP on readmission and/or mortality were included in our meta‐analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in non‐randomized studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. From 232 retrieved studies, 12 were included in the data synthesis. The 6040 patients in the included studies had a mean age of 72 ± 4 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 39 ± 8%, there were slightly more men (n = 3022) than women, and the follow‐up period was a mean of 4.8 ± 3.1 months. Readmission data were available in 5362 patients; of these, 1629 were readmitted. Mortality data were available in 5787 patients; of these, 584 died. HF patients who had an AFMP in hospital and/or after discharge had lower odds of all‐cause readmission (odds ratio—OR 0.64 [95% confidence interval—CI 0.44, 0.92], P = 0.02) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 46.5) and lower odds of all‐cause mortality (OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.69, 0.98], P = 0.03) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0). The use of an AFMP was equally effective in reducing readmission and mortality regardless of age and follow‐up duration. Effective pre‐discharge diuresis was associated with significantly lower readmission odds (OR 0.43 [95% CI 0.26, 0.71], P = 0.001) compared with a fluid management plan as part of post‐discharge follow‐up. Conclusions An effective AFMP is associated with improving readmission and mortality in HF. Our results encourage attainment of optimal volume status at discharge and prescription of optimal diuretic dose. Ongoing support to maintain euvolaemia and effective collaboration between healthcare teams, along with effective patient education and engagement, may help to reduce adverse outcomes in HF patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T20:54:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a25be4bd0f364e2bb01a09936a3d6ba6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T20:54:13Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-a25be4bd0f364e2bb01a09936a3d6ba62022-12-21T21:32:55ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222021-10-01854228424210.1002/ehf2.13510Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysisGeorgios Zisis0Amera Halabi1Quan Huynh2Christopher Neil3Melinda Carrington4Thomas H. Marwick5Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute 75 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 AustraliaBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute 75 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 AustraliaBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute 75 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 AustraliaBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute 75 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 AustraliaBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute 75 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 AustraliaBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute 75 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 AustraliaAbstract Aims Fluid congestion is a leading cause of hospital admission, readmission, and mortality in heart failure (HF). We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of an advanced fluid management programme (AFMP). The AFMP was defined as an intervention providing tailored diuretic therapy guided by intravascular volume assessment, in hospitalized patients or after discharge. The AFMP group was compared with patients who received standard care treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the effectiveness of an AFMP in improving patient outcomes. Methods and results A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, case–control studies, and crossover studies using the terms ‘heart failure’, ‘fluid management’, and ‘readmission’ was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus up until November 2020. Studies reporting the association of an AFMP on readmission and/or mortality were included in our meta‐analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in non‐randomized studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. From 232 retrieved studies, 12 were included in the data synthesis. The 6040 patients in the included studies had a mean age of 72 ± 4 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 39 ± 8%, there were slightly more men (n = 3022) than women, and the follow‐up period was a mean of 4.8 ± 3.1 months. Readmission data were available in 5362 patients; of these, 1629 were readmitted. Mortality data were available in 5787 patients; of these, 584 died. HF patients who had an AFMP in hospital and/or after discharge had lower odds of all‐cause readmission (odds ratio—OR 0.64 [95% confidence interval—CI 0.44, 0.92], P = 0.02) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 46.5) and lower odds of all‐cause mortality (OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.69, 0.98], P = 0.03) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0). The use of an AFMP was equally effective in reducing readmission and mortality regardless of age and follow‐up duration. Effective pre‐discharge diuresis was associated with significantly lower readmission odds (OR 0.43 [95% CI 0.26, 0.71], P = 0.001) compared with a fluid management plan as part of post‐discharge follow‐up. Conclusions An effective AFMP is associated with improving readmission and mortality in HF. Our results encourage attainment of optimal volume status at discharge and prescription of optimal diuretic dose. Ongoing support to maintain euvolaemia and effective collaboration between healthcare teams, along with effective patient education and engagement, may help to reduce adverse outcomes in HF patients.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13510Fluid managementADHFDecongestionDiuresisAdherenceGuided treatment
spellingShingle Georgios Zisis
Amera Halabi
Quan Huynh
Christopher Neil
Melinda Carrington
Thomas H. Marwick
Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis
ESC Heart Failure
Fluid management
ADHF
Decongestion
Diuresis
Adherence
Guided treatment
title Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Use of novel non‐invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort use of novel non invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission systematic review and meta analysis
topic Fluid management
ADHF
Decongestion
Diuresis
Adherence
Guided treatment
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13510
work_keys_str_mv AT georgioszisis useofnovelnoninvasivetechniquesandbiomarkerstoguideoutpatientmanagementoffluidoverloadandreducehospitalreadmissionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amerahalabi useofnovelnoninvasivetechniquesandbiomarkerstoguideoutpatientmanagementoffluidoverloadandreducehospitalreadmissionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quanhuynh useofnovelnoninvasivetechniquesandbiomarkerstoguideoutpatientmanagementoffluidoverloadandreducehospitalreadmissionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT christopherneil useofnovelnoninvasivetechniquesandbiomarkerstoguideoutpatientmanagementoffluidoverloadandreducehospitalreadmissionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT melindacarrington useofnovelnoninvasivetechniquesandbiomarkerstoguideoutpatientmanagementoffluidoverloadandreducehospitalreadmissionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomashmarwick useofnovelnoninvasivetechniquesandbiomarkerstoguideoutpatientmanagementoffluidoverloadandreducehospitalreadmissionsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis