Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors

Study aims This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy (ME) for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Patients and methods We enrolled 103 consecutive patients with non-ampullary duodenal tumors that were observed by ME with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takeshi Mizumoto, Yoji Sanomura, Shinji Tanaka, Kazutoshi Kuroki, Mio Kurihara, Yoshikazu Yoshifuku, Shiro Oka, Koji Arihiro, Fumio Shimamoto, Kazuaki Chayama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-04-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-103681
_version_ 1818136784628875264
author Takeshi Mizumoto
Yoji Sanomura
Shinji Tanaka
Kazutoshi Kuroki
Mio Kurihara
Yoshikazu Yoshifuku
Shiro Oka
Koji Arihiro
Fumio Shimamoto
Kazuaki Chayama
author_facet Takeshi Mizumoto
Yoji Sanomura
Shinji Tanaka
Kazutoshi Kuroki
Mio Kurihara
Yoshikazu Yoshifuku
Shiro Oka
Koji Arihiro
Fumio Shimamoto
Kazuaki Chayama
author_sort Takeshi Mizumoto
collection DOAJ
description Study aims This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy (ME) for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Patients and methods We enrolled 103 consecutive patients with non-ampullary duodenal tumors that were observed by ME with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and had pit pattern analysis before endoscopic resection at Hiroshima University Hospital before December 2014. ME-NBI images were classified as Type B or Type C according to the Hiroshima classification, and pit patterns were classified as regular or irregular. We studied the clinicopathological features and diagnoses with ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses according to the Vienna classification (category 3: 73 patients; category 4: 30 patients). Results Category 4 lesions were significantly larger than category 3 lesions. According to ME-NBI images, category 4 Type C lesions (83 %) were significantly more common than category 4 Type B lesions (17 %). According to pit pattern analyses, category 4 irregular lesions 4 (77 %) were significantly more common than category 4 regular lesions (23 %). The accuracies of using Type C ME-NBI images and irregular pit patterns to diagnose category 4 lesions were 87 % and 84 %, the sensitivities were 83 % and 77 %, and the specificities were 89 % and 88 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses for diagnosing the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Conclusion Our study showed that ME-NBI and pit pattern analysis had equivalent abilities to determine the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. ME-NBI may be more useful because it is a simple, less time-consuming procedure.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:45:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a25e607d03414537b3010a767311f065
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:45:55Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-a25e607d03414537b3010a767311f0652022-12-22T01:12:33ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362017-04-010504E297E30210.1055/s-0043-103681Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumorsTakeshi Mizumoto0Yoji Sanomura1Shinji Tanaka2Kazutoshi Kuroki3Mio Kurihara4Yoshikazu Yoshifuku5Shiro Oka6Koji Arihiro7Fumio Shimamoto8Kazuaki Chayama9Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanDepartment of the Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences, Hiroshima Shudo University, 1-1-1 Otsukahigashi, Asaminami-ku, Hiroshima 731-3195, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, JapanStudy aims This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy (ME) for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Patients and methods We enrolled 103 consecutive patients with non-ampullary duodenal tumors that were observed by ME with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and had pit pattern analysis before endoscopic resection at Hiroshima University Hospital before December 2014. ME-NBI images were classified as Type B or Type C according to the Hiroshima classification, and pit patterns were classified as regular or irregular. We studied the clinicopathological features and diagnoses with ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses according to the Vienna classification (category 3: 73 patients; category 4: 30 patients). Results Category 4 lesions were significantly larger than category 3 lesions. According to ME-NBI images, category 4 Type C lesions (83 %) were significantly more common than category 4 Type B lesions (17 %). According to pit pattern analyses, category 4 irregular lesions 4 (77 %) were significantly more common than category 4 regular lesions (23 %). The accuracies of using Type C ME-NBI images and irregular pit patterns to diagnose category 4 lesions were 87 % and 84 %, the sensitivities were 83 % and 77 %, and the specificities were 89 % and 88 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses for diagnosing the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Conclusion Our study showed that ME-NBI and pit pattern analysis had equivalent abilities to determine the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. ME-NBI may be more useful because it is a simple, less time-consuming procedure.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-103681
spellingShingle Takeshi Mizumoto
Yoji Sanomura
Shinji Tanaka
Kazutoshi Kuroki
Mio Kurihara
Yoshikazu Yoshifuku
Shiro Oka
Koji Arihiro
Fumio Shimamoto
Kazuaki Chayama
Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors
Endoscopy International Open
title Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors
title_full Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors
title_fullStr Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors
title_full_unstemmed Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors
title_short Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors
title_sort clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non ampullary duodenal tumors
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-103681
work_keys_str_mv AT takeshimizumoto clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT yojisanomura clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT shinjitanaka clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT kazutoshikuroki clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT miokurihara clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT yoshikazuyoshifuku clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT shirooka clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT kojiarihiro clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT fumioshimamoto clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors
AT kazuakichayama clinicalusefulnessofmagnifyingendoscopyfornonampullaryduodenaltumors