How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species

Abstract Trade‐offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient‐rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frédéric Douhard, Mathieu Douhard, Hélène Gilbert, Philippe Monget, Jean‐Michel Gaillard, Jean‐François Lemaître
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Evolutionary Applications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13320
_version_ 1819102406275760128
author Frédéric Douhard
Mathieu Douhard
Hélène Gilbert
Philippe Monget
Jean‐Michel Gaillard
Jean‐François Lemaître
author_facet Frédéric Douhard
Mathieu Douhard
Hélène Gilbert
Philippe Monget
Jean‐Michel Gaillard
Jean‐François Lemaître
author_sort Frédéric Douhard
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Trade‐offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient‐rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not yet been reached despite strong selection for higher meat, milk or egg yields. Yet, negative genetic correlations between productivity traits and health or fertility traits have often been reported, supporting the view that trade‐offs do occur in the context of nonlimiting resources. The importance of allocation mechanisms in limiting genetic changes can thus be questioned when animals are mostly constrained by their time to acquire and process energy rather than by feed availability. Selection for high productivity traits early in life should promote a fast metabolism with less energy allocated to self‐maintenance (contributing to soma preservation and repair). Consequently, the capacity to breed shortly after an intensive period of production or to remain healthy should be compromised. We assessed those predictions in mammalian and avian livestock and related laboratory model species. First, we surveyed studies that compared energy allocation to maintenance between breeds or lines of contrasting productivity but found little support for the occurrence of an energy allocation trade‐off. Second, selection experiments for lower feed intake per unit of product (i.e. higher feed efficiency) generally resulted in reduced allocation to maintenance, but this did not entail fitness costs in terms of survival or future reproduction. These findings indicate that the consequences of a particular selection in domestic animals are much more difficult to predict than one could anticipate from the energy allocation framework alone. Future developments to predict the contribution of time constraints and trade‐offs to selection limits will be insightful to breed livestock in increasingly challenging environments.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:34:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a264ffda2bf24c64a8c96f9b8290cc25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-4571
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:34:03Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Evolutionary Applications
spelling doaj.art-a264ffda2bf24c64a8c96f9b8290cc252022-12-21T18:43:25ZengWileyEvolutionary Applications1752-45712021-12-0114122726274910.1111/eva.13320How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model speciesFrédéric Douhard0Mathieu Douhard1Hélène Gilbert2Philippe Monget3Jean‐Michel Gaillard4Jean‐François Lemaître5GenPhySE INRAE ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet‐Tolosan FranceLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne FranceGenPhySE INRAE ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet‐Tolosan FranceCNRS IFCE INRAE PRC Université de Tours Nouzilly FranceLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne FranceLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne FranceAbstract Trade‐offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient‐rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not yet been reached despite strong selection for higher meat, milk or egg yields. Yet, negative genetic correlations between productivity traits and health or fertility traits have often been reported, supporting the view that trade‐offs do occur in the context of nonlimiting resources. The importance of allocation mechanisms in limiting genetic changes can thus be questioned when animals are mostly constrained by their time to acquire and process energy rather than by feed availability. Selection for high productivity traits early in life should promote a fast metabolism with less energy allocated to self‐maintenance (contributing to soma preservation and repair). Consequently, the capacity to breed shortly after an intensive period of production or to remain healthy should be compromised. We assessed those predictions in mammalian and avian livestock and related laboratory model species. First, we surveyed studies that compared energy allocation to maintenance between breeds or lines of contrasting productivity but found little support for the occurrence of an energy allocation trade‐off. Second, selection experiments for lower feed intake per unit of product (i.e. higher feed efficiency) generally resulted in reduced allocation to maintenance, but this did not entail fitness costs in terms of survival or future reproduction. These findings indicate that the consequences of a particular selection in domestic animals are much more difficult to predict than one could anticipate from the energy allocation framework alone. Future developments to predict the contribution of time constraints and trade‐offs to selection limits will be insightful to breed livestock in increasingly challenging environments.https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13320livestock breedingmetabolic ratepleiotropysenescencetrade‐offs
spellingShingle Frédéric Douhard
Mathieu Douhard
Hélène Gilbert
Philippe Monget
Jean‐Michel Gaillard
Jean‐François Lemaître
How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
Evolutionary Applications
livestock breeding
metabolic rate
pleiotropy
senescence
trade‐offs
title How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_full How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_fullStr How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_full_unstemmed How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_short How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_sort how much energetic trade offs limit selection insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
topic livestock breeding
metabolic rate
pleiotropy
senescence
trade‐offs
url https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13320
work_keys_str_mv AT fredericdouhard howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT mathieudouhard howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT helenegilbert howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT philippemonget howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT jeanmichelgaillard howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT jeanfrancoislemaitre howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies