Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study

BackgroundReproductive health conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affect a large proportion of women and people who menstruate worldwide. Prevalence estimates for these conditions range from 5% to 40% of women of reproducti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly Peven, Aidan P Wickham, Octavia Wilks, Yusuf C Kaplan, Andrei Marhol, Saddif Ahmed, Ryan Bamford, Adam C Cunningham, Carley Prentice, András Meczner, Matthew Fenech, Stephen Gilbert, Anna Klepchukova, Sonia Ponzo, Liudmila Zhaunova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2023-12-01
Series:JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Online Access:https://mhealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e46718
_version_ 1827595215024685056
author Kimberly Peven
Aidan P Wickham
Octavia Wilks
Yusuf C Kaplan
Andrei Marhol
Saddif Ahmed
Ryan Bamford
Adam C Cunningham
Carley Prentice
András Meczner
Matthew Fenech
Stephen Gilbert
Anna Klepchukova
Sonia Ponzo
Liudmila Zhaunova
author_facet Kimberly Peven
Aidan P Wickham
Octavia Wilks
Yusuf C Kaplan
Andrei Marhol
Saddif Ahmed
Ryan Bamford
Adam C Cunningham
Carley Prentice
András Meczner
Matthew Fenech
Stephen Gilbert
Anna Klepchukova
Sonia Ponzo
Liudmila Zhaunova
author_sort Kimberly Peven
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundReproductive health conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affect a large proportion of women and people who menstruate worldwide. Prevalence estimates for these conditions range from 5% to 40% of women of reproductive age. Long diagnostic delays, up to 12 years, are common and contribute to health complications and increased health care costs. Symptom checker apps provide users with information and tools to better understand their symptoms and thus have the potential to reduce the time to diagnosis for reproductive health conditions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the agreement between clinicians and 3 symptom checkers (developed by Flo Health UK Limited) in assessing symptoms of endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and PCOS using vignettes. We also aimed to present a robust example of vignette case creation, review, and classification in the context of predeployment testing and validation of digital health symptom checker tools. MethodsIndependent general practitioners were recruited to create clinical case vignettes of simulated users for the purpose of testing each condition symptom checker; vignettes created for each condition contained a mixture of condition-positive and condition-negative outcomes. A second panel of general practitioners then reviewed, approved, and modified (if necessary) each vignette. A third group of general practitioners reviewed each vignette case and designated a final classification. Vignettes were then entered into the symptom checkers by a fourth, different group of general practitioners. The outcomes of each symptom checker were then compared with the final classification of each vignette to produce accuracy metrics including percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. ResultsA total of 24 cases were created per condition. Overall, exact matches between the vignette general practitioner classification and the symptom checker outcome were 83% (n=20) for endometriosis, 83% (n=20) for uterine fibroids, and 88% (n=21) for PCOS. For each symptom checker, sensitivity was reported as 81.8% for endometriosis, 84.6% for uterine fibroids, and 100% for PCOS; specificity was reported as 84.6% for endometriosis, 81.8% for uterine fibroids, and 75% for PCOS; positive predictive value was reported as 81.8% for endometriosis, 84.6% for uterine fibroids, 80% for PCOS; and negative predictive value was reported as 84.6% for endometriosis, 81.8% for uterine fibroids, and 100% for PCOS. ConclusionsThe single-condition symptom checkers have high levels of agreement with general practitioner classification for endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and PCOS. Given long delays in diagnosis for many reproductive health conditions, which lead to increased medical costs and potential health complications for individuals and health care providers, innovative health apps and symptom checkers hold the potential to improve care pathways.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:48:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a27f2a74d01e4778ab0db20174d8af04
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2291-5222
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:48:27Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR mHealth and uHealth
spelling doaj.art-a27f2a74d01e4778ab0db20174d8af042023-12-05T15:00:46ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222023-12-0111e4671810.2196/46718Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes StudyKimberly Pevenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-4084Aidan P Wickhamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-059XOctavia Wilkshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6299-4627Yusuf C Kaplanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0369-7934Andrei Marholhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-2593Saddif Ahmedhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-0899Ryan Bamfordhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-3782Adam C Cunninghamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-7813Carley Prenticehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-1388András Mecznerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8136-7768Matthew Fenechhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-0215Stephen Gilberthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1997-1689Anna Klepchukovahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3035-3267Sonia Ponzohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6754-5078Liudmila Zhaunovahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-1898 BackgroundReproductive health conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affect a large proportion of women and people who menstruate worldwide. Prevalence estimates for these conditions range from 5% to 40% of women of reproductive age. Long diagnostic delays, up to 12 years, are common and contribute to health complications and increased health care costs. Symptom checker apps provide users with information and tools to better understand their symptoms and thus have the potential to reduce the time to diagnosis for reproductive health conditions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the agreement between clinicians and 3 symptom checkers (developed by Flo Health UK Limited) in assessing symptoms of endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and PCOS using vignettes. We also aimed to present a robust example of vignette case creation, review, and classification in the context of predeployment testing and validation of digital health symptom checker tools. MethodsIndependent general practitioners were recruited to create clinical case vignettes of simulated users for the purpose of testing each condition symptom checker; vignettes created for each condition contained a mixture of condition-positive and condition-negative outcomes. A second panel of general practitioners then reviewed, approved, and modified (if necessary) each vignette. A third group of general practitioners reviewed each vignette case and designated a final classification. Vignettes were then entered into the symptom checkers by a fourth, different group of general practitioners. The outcomes of each symptom checker were then compared with the final classification of each vignette to produce accuracy metrics including percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. ResultsA total of 24 cases were created per condition. Overall, exact matches between the vignette general practitioner classification and the symptom checker outcome were 83% (n=20) for endometriosis, 83% (n=20) for uterine fibroids, and 88% (n=21) for PCOS. For each symptom checker, sensitivity was reported as 81.8% for endometriosis, 84.6% for uterine fibroids, and 100% for PCOS; specificity was reported as 84.6% for endometriosis, 81.8% for uterine fibroids, and 75% for PCOS; positive predictive value was reported as 81.8% for endometriosis, 84.6% for uterine fibroids, 80% for PCOS; and negative predictive value was reported as 84.6% for endometriosis, 81.8% for uterine fibroids, and 100% for PCOS. ConclusionsThe single-condition symptom checkers have high levels of agreement with general practitioner classification for endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and PCOS. Given long delays in diagnosis for many reproductive health conditions, which lead to increased medical costs and potential health complications for individuals and health care providers, innovative health apps and symptom checkers hold the potential to improve care pathways.https://mhealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e46718
spellingShingle Kimberly Peven
Aidan P Wickham
Octavia Wilks
Yusuf C Kaplan
Andrei Marhol
Saddif Ahmed
Ryan Bamford
Adam C Cunningham
Carley Prentice
András Meczner
Matthew Fenech
Stephen Gilbert
Anna Klepchukova
Sonia Ponzo
Liudmila Zhaunova
Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
title Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study
title_full Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study
title_fullStr Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study
title_short Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study
title_sort assessment of a digital symptom checker tool s accuracy in suggesting reproductive health conditions clinical vignettes study
url https://mhealth.jmir.org/2023/1/e46718
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlypeven assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT aidanpwickham assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT octaviawilks assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT yusufckaplan assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT andreimarhol assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT saddifahmed assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT ryanbamford assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT adamccunningham assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT carleyprentice assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT andrasmeczner assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT matthewfenech assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT stephengilbert assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT annaklepchukova assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT soniaponzo assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy
AT liudmilazhaunova assessmentofadigitalsymptomcheckertoolsaccuracyinsuggestingreproductivehealthconditionsclinicalvignettesstudy