Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth

In cases of severely compromised teeth, dental practitioners are confronted with the therapeutic decision of whether to restore a tooth or replace it with an implant. Comparative scientific evidence on patient perception of both treatment approaches is scarce. The subject of this prospective clinica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Bruhnke, Michael Naumann, Florian Beuer, Insa Herklotz, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse, Stefan Neumeyer, Manja von Stein-Lausnitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/24/7496
_version_ 1797457078092038144
author Maria Bruhnke
Michael Naumann
Florian Beuer
Insa Herklotz
Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse
Stefan Neumeyer
Manja von Stein-Lausnitz
author_facet Maria Bruhnke
Michael Naumann
Florian Beuer
Insa Herklotz
Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse
Stefan Neumeyer
Manja von Stein-Lausnitz
author_sort Maria Bruhnke
collection DOAJ
description In cases of severely compromised teeth, dental practitioners are confronted with the therapeutic decision of whether to restore a tooth or replace it with an implant. Comparative scientific evidence on patient perception of both treatment approaches is scarce. The subject of this prospective clinical study was to compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between two treatment groups: restoration of severely destroyed teeth after orthodontic extrusion (FOE) versus tooth extraction and implant-supported single crown restoration (ISC). A self-selected trial was performed with 21 patients per group. OHRQoL was assessed with the aid of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G49) at different time intervals: before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), after restoration (T3) and at recall (T4). Overall, OHIP scores improved from baseline to follow-up for both concepts with no significant differences between groups. There were no significant differences in subscales between FOE and ISC at T1, T3 and T4. In terms of functional limitations (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and physical disability (<i>p</i> = 0.021), patients in the FOE group temporarily exhibited lower OHRQoL at T2 in comparison to the ISC group. However, at baseline, after final restoration and at recall, the study demonstrates the same level of OHRQoL for both treatment concepts.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:16:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2827a8b8d854f4eb40a5798a6a5f347
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:16:02Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a2827a8b8d854f4eb40a5798a6a5f3472023-11-24T15:46:36ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-12-011124749610.3390/jcm11247496Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” TeethMaria Bruhnke0Michael Naumann1Florian Beuer2Insa Herklotz3Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse4Stefan Neumeyer5Manja von Stein-Lausnitz6Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyPrivate Practice Dr. Neumeyer & Partner, Leminger Straße 10, 93458 Eschlkam, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyIn cases of severely compromised teeth, dental practitioners are confronted with the therapeutic decision of whether to restore a tooth or replace it with an implant. Comparative scientific evidence on patient perception of both treatment approaches is scarce. The subject of this prospective clinical study was to compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between two treatment groups: restoration of severely destroyed teeth after orthodontic extrusion (FOE) versus tooth extraction and implant-supported single crown restoration (ISC). A self-selected trial was performed with 21 patients per group. OHRQoL was assessed with the aid of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G49) at different time intervals: before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), after restoration (T3) and at recall (T4). Overall, OHIP scores improved from baseline to follow-up for both concepts with no significant differences between groups. There were no significant differences in subscales between FOE and ISC at T1, T3 and T4. In terms of functional limitations (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and physical disability (<i>p</i> = 0.021), patients in the FOE group temporarily exhibited lower OHRQoL at T2 in comparison to the ISC group. However, at baseline, after final restoration and at recall, the study demonstrates the same level of OHRQoL for both treatment concepts.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/24/7496forced orthodontic extrusionendodontically treated toothoral health-related quality of lifepatient perceptionforced eruptionorthodontic extrusion
spellingShingle Maria Bruhnke
Michael Naumann
Florian Beuer
Insa Herklotz
Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse
Stefan Neumeyer
Manja von Stein-Lausnitz
Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth
Journal of Clinical Medicine
forced orthodontic extrusion
endodontically treated tooth
oral health-related quality of life
patient perception
forced eruption
orthodontic extrusion
title Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth
title_full Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth
title_fullStr Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth
title_short Implant or Tooth?—A Prospective Clinical Study on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with “Unrestorable” Teeth
title_sort implant or tooth a prospective clinical study on oral health related quality of life for patients with unrestorable teeth
topic forced orthodontic extrusion
endodontically treated tooth
oral health-related quality of life
patient perception
forced eruption
orthodontic extrusion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/24/7496
work_keys_str_mv AT mariabruhnke implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth
AT michaelnaumann implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth
AT florianbeuer implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth
AT insaherklotz implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth
AT matswernfriedheinrichbose implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth
AT stefanneumeyer implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth
AT manjavonsteinlausnitz implantortoothaprospectiveclinicalstudyonoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeforpatientswithunrestorableteeth