Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes

The mass balance of glaciers and ice caps is sensitive to changing climate conditions. The mass changes derived in this study are determined from elevation changes derived measured by the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) for the time period 2003–2009. Four methods, based on interpol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Nilsson, L. Sandberg Sørensen, V. R. Barletta, R. Forsberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-01-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:http://www.the-cryosphere.net/9/139/2015/tc-9-139-2015.pdf
_version_ 1811309308265103360
author J. Nilsson
L. Sandberg Sørensen
V. R. Barletta
R. Forsberg
author_facet J. Nilsson
L. Sandberg Sørensen
V. R. Barletta
R. Forsberg
author_sort J. Nilsson
collection DOAJ
description The mass balance of glaciers and ice caps is sensitive to changing climate conditions. The mass changes derived in this study are determined from elevation changes derived measured by the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) for the time period 2003–2009. Four methods, based on interpolation and extrapolation, are used to regionalize these elevation changes to areas without satellite coverage. A constant density assumption is then applied to estimate the mass change by integrating over the entire glaciated region. <br><br> The main purpose of this study is to investigate the sensitivity of the regional mass balance of Arctic ice caps and glaciers to different regionalization schemes. The sensitivity analysis is based on studying the spread of mass changes and their associated errors, and the suitability of the different regionalization techniques is assessed through cross-validation. <br><br> The cross-validation results shows comparable accuracies for all regionalization methods, but the inferred mass change in individual regions, such as Svalbard and Iceland, can vary up to 4 Gt a<sup>−1</sup>, which exceeds the estimated errors by roughly 50% for these regions. This study further finds that this spread in mass balance is connected to the magnitude of the elevation change variability. This indicates that care should be taken when choosing a regionalization method, especially for areas which exhibit large variability in elevation change.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:40:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a28ed2955dea46efa9e728cea5227d8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:40:01Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj.art-a28ed2955dea46efa9e728cea5227d8e2022-12-22T02:51:57ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242015-01-019113915010.5194/tc-9-139-2015Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changesJ. Nilsson0L. Sandberg Sørensen1V. R. Barletta2R. Forsberg3Department of Geodynamics, DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Lyngby, DenmarkDepartment of Geodynamics, DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Lyngby, DenmarkDepartment of Geodynamics, DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Lyngby, DenmarkDepartment of Geodynamics, DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Lyngby, DenmarkThe mass balance of glaciers and ice caps is sensitive to changing climate conditions. The mass changes derived in this study are determined from elevation changes derived measured by the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) for the time period 2003–2009. Four methods, based on interpolation and extrapolation, are used to regionalize these elevation changes to areas without satellite coverage. A constant density assumption is then applied to estimate the mass change by integrating over the entire glaciated region. <br><br> The main purpose of this study is to investigate the sensitivity of the regional mass balance of Arctic ice caps and glaciers to different regionalization schemes. The sensitivity analysis is based on studying the spread of mass changes and their associated errors, and the suitability of the different regionalization techniques is assessed through cross-validation. <br><br> The cross-validation results shows comparable accuracies for all regionalization methods, but the inferred mass change in individual regions, such as Svalbard and Iceland, can vary up to 4 Gt a<sup>−1</sup>, which exceeds the estimated errors by roughly 50% for these regions. This study further finds that this spread in mass balance is connected to the magnitude of the elevation change variability. This indicates that care should be taken when choosing a regionalization method, especially for areas which exhibit large variability in elevation change.http://www.the-cryosphere.net/9/139/2015/tc-9-139-2015.pdf
spellingShingle J. Nilsson
L. Sandberg Sørensen
V. R. Barletta
R. Forsberg
Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes
The Cryosphere
title Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes
title_full Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes
title_fullStr Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes
title_full_unstemmed Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes
title_short Mass changes in Arctic ice caps and glaciers: implications of regionalizing elevation changes
title_sort mass changes in arctic ice caps and glaciers implications of regionalizing elevation changes
url http://www.the-cryosphere.net/9/139/2015/tc-9-139-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jnilsson masschangesinarcticicecapsandglaciersimplicationsofregionalizingelevationchanges
AT lsandbergsørensen masschangesinarcticicecapsandglaciersimplicationsofregionalizingelevationchanges
AT vrbarletta masschangesinarcticicecapsandglaciersimplicationsofregionalizingelevationchanges
AT rforsberg masschangesinarcticicecapsandglaciersimplicationsofregionalizingelevationchanges