The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation

Background: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: Patients ( n  = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes, Sheila Dryden, Nicola Alexander Hanania
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-10-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206
_version_ 1819158001845534720
author Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes
Sheila Dryden
Nicola Alexander Hanania
author_facet Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes
Sheila Dryden
Nicola Alexander Hanania
author_sort Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes
collection DOAJ
description Background: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: Patients ( n  = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisciplinary PR, comprising 2 h (1 h exercise and 1 h education) weekly. Anxiety, exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea, fatigue were measured pre- and post-PR, utilizing the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR), Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and MCFS, respectively. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 72 (8) years, and 50% were women. Total MCFS score fell after PR mean (95% confidence interval) −4.89 (–7.90 to −3.79) as did domain scores: physical −1.89 (–2.33 to −1.46), cognition −1.37 (–1.65 to −1.09), and psychosocial −1.62 (–2.00 to −1.62). Total MCFS effect size (ES) was 0.55; and for domains, physical was 0.52, cognition was 0.59, and psychosocial was 0.51. The ES for AIR was 0.30, mMRC was 0.38, SGRQ was 0.66, and ISWT was 1.19. MCFS changes correlated with changes in both SGRQ ( p  < 0.002) and AIR ( p  < 0.004), but not ISWT ( p  = 0.30) or mMRC ( p  = 0.18). The AIR, SGRQ, mMRC, and ISWT all improved after PR (all, p  < 0.001). Conclusion: The MCFS scale is a valid and responsive scale to measure fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T16:17:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2972ed21ba044a08a41ec4aa4e481c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2040-6231
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T16:17:43Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
spelling doaj.art-a2972ed21ba044a08a41ec4aa4e481c02022-12-21T18:20:20ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease2040-62312019-10-011010.1177/2040622319882206The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitationAbebaw Mengistu YohannesSheila DrydenNicola Alexander HananiaBackground: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: Patients ( n  = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisciplinary PR, comprising 2 h (1 h exercise and 1 h education) weekly. Anxiety, exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea, fatigue were measured pre- and post-PR, utilizing the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR), Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and MCFS, respectively. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 72 (8) years, and 50% were women. Total MCFS score fell after PR mean (95% confidence interval) −4.89 (–7.90 to −3.79) as did domain scores: physical −1.89 (–2.33 to −1.46), cognition −1.37 (–1.65 to −1.09), and psychosocial −1.62 (–2.00 to −1.62). Total MCFS effect size (ES) was 0.55; and for domains, physical was 0.52, cognition was 0.59, and psychosocial was 0.51. The ES for AIR was 0.30, mMRC was 0.38, SGRQ was 0.66, and ISWT was 1.19. MCFS changes correlated with changes in both SGRQ ( p  < 0.002) and AIR ( p  < 0.004), but not ISWT ( p  = 0.30) or mMRC ( p  = 0.18). The AIR, SGRQ, mMRC, and ISWT all improved after PR (all, p  < 0.001). Conclusion: The MCFS scale is a valid and responsive scale to measure fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206
spellingShingle Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes
Sheila Dryden
Nicola Alexander Hanania
The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
title The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_full The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_fullStr The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_short The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_sort responsiveness of the manchester chronic obstructive pulmonary disease fatigue scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206
work_keys_str_mv AT abebawmengistuyohannes theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT sheiladryden theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT nicolaalexanderhanania theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT abebawmengistuyohannes responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT sheiladryden responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT nicolaalexanderhanania responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation