The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
Background: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: Patients ( n = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisc...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206 |
_version_ | 1819158001845534720 |
---|---|
author | Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes Sheila Dryden Nicola Alexander Hanania |
author_facet | Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes Sheila Dryden Nicola Alexander Hanania |
author_sort | Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: Patients ( n = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisciplinary PR, comprising 2 h (1 h exercise and 1 h education) weekly. Anxiety, exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea, fatigue were measured pre- and post-PR, utilizing the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR), Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and MCFS, respectively. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 72 (8) years, and 50% were women. Total MCFS score fell after PR mean (95% confidence interval) −4.89 (–7.90 to −3.79) as did domain scores: physical −1.89 (–2.33 to −1.46), cognition −1.37 (–1.65 to −1.09), and psychosocial −1.62 (–2.00 to −1.62). Total MCFS effect size (ES) was 0.55; and for domains, physical was 0.52, cognition was 0.59, and psychosocial was 0.51. The ES for AIR was 0.30, mMRC was 0.38, SGRQ was 0.66, and ISWT was 1.19. MCFS changes correlated with changes in both SGRQ ( p < 0.002) and AIR ( p < 0.004), but not ISWT ( p = 0.30) or mMRC ( p = 0.18). The AIR, SGRQ, mMRC, and ISWT all improved after PR (all, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The MCFS scale is a valid and responsive scale to measure fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T16:17:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a2972ed21ba044a08a41ec4aa4e481c0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2040-6231 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T16:17:43Z |
publishDate | 2019-10-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease |
spelling | doaj.art-a2972ed21ba044a08a41ec4aa4e481c02022-12-21T18:20:20ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease2040-62312019-10-011010.1177/2040622319882206The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitationAbebaw Mengistu YohannesSheila DrydenNicola Alexander HananiaBackground: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: Patients ( n = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisciplinary PR, comprising 2 h (1 h exercise and 1 h education) weekly. Anxiety, exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea, fatigue were measured pre- and post-PR, utilizing the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR), Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and MCFS, respectively. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 72 (8) years, and 50% were women. Total MCFS score fell after PR mean (95% confidence interval) −4.89 (–7.90 to −3.79) as did domain scores: physical −1.89 (–2.33 to −1.46), cognition −1.37 (–1.65 to −1.09), and psychosocial −1.62 (–2.00 to −1.62). Total MCFS effect size (ES) was 0.55; and for domains, physical was 0.52, cognition was 0.59, and psychosocial was 0.51. The ES for AIR was 0.30, mMRC was 0.38, SGRQ was 0.66, and ISWT was 1.19. MCFS changes correlated with changes in both SGRQ ( p < 0.002) and AIR ( p < 0.004), but not ISWT ( p = 0.30) or mMRC ( p = 0.18). The AIR, SGRQ, mMRC, and ISWT all improved after PR (all, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The MCFS scale is a valid and responsive scale to measure fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206 |
spellingShingle | Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes Sheila Dryden Nicola Alexander Hanania The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease |
title | The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation |
title_full | The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation |
title_fullStr | The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation |
title_full_unstemmed | The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation |
title_short | The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation |
title_sort | responsiveness of the manchester chronic obstructive pulmonary disease fatigue scale to pulmonary rehabilitation |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abebawmengistuyohannes theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation AT sheiladryden theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation AT nicolaalexanderhanania theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation AT abebawmengistuyohannes responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation AT sheiladryden responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation AT nicolaalexanderhanania responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation |