Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Emerging evidence indicate that the mammalian checkpoint kinase ATM induces transcriptional silencing in cis to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through a poorly understood mechanism. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae a single DSB causes transcriptional inhibition of proximal genes indepe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicola Manfrini, Michela Clerici, Maxime Wery, Chiara Vittoria Colombo, Marc Descrimes, Antonin Morillon, Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna, Maria Pia Longhese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2015-07-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/08942
_version_ 1811200185063178240
author Nicola Manfrini
Michela Clerici
Maxime Wery
Chiara Vittoria Colombo
Marc Descrimes
Antonin Morillon
Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Maria Pia Longhese
author_facet Nicola Manfrini
Michela Clerici
Maxime Wery
Chiara Vittoria Colombo
Marc Descrimes
Antonin Morillon
Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Maria Pia Longhese
author_sort Nicola Manfrini
collection DOAJ
description Emerging evidence indicate that the mammalian checkpoint kinase ATM induces transcriptional silencing in cis to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through a poorly understood mechanism. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae a single DSB causes transcriptional inhibition of proximal genes independently of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR. Since the DSB ends undergo nucleolytic degradation (resection) of their 5′-ending strands, we investigated the contribution of resection in this DSB-induced transcriptional inhibition. We discovered that resection-defective mutants fail to stop transcription around a DSB, and the extent of this failure correlates with the severity of the resection defect. Furthermore, Rad9 and generation of γH2A reduce this DSB-induced transcriptional inhibition by counteracting DSB resection. Therefore, the conversion of the DSB ends from double-stranded to single-stranded DNA, which is necessary to initiate DSB repair by homologous recombination, is responsible for loss of transcription around a DSB in S. cerevisiae.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:00:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a299f99c985c4aaeb20cb74120be2584
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:00:32Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-a299f99c985c4aaeb20cb74120be25842022-12-22T03:52:41ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2015-07-01410.7554/eLife.08942Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeNicola Manfrini0Michela Clerici1Maxime Wery2Chiara Vittoria Colombo3Marc Descrimes4Antonin Morillon5Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna6Maria Pia Longhese7Dipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, ItalyDipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, ItalyInstitut Curie, Dynamics of Genetic Information: Fundamental Basis and Cancer, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, FranceDipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, ItalyInstitut Curie, Dynamics of Genetic Information: Fundamental Basis and Cancer, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, FranceInstitut Curie, Dynamics of Genetic Information: Fundamental Basis and Cancer, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, FranceIFOM Foundation, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan, Italy; Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pavia, ItalyDipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, ItalyEmerging evidence indicate that the mammalian checkpoint kinase ATM induces transcriptional silencing in cis to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through a poorly understood mechanism. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae a single DSB causes transcriptional inhibition of proximal genes independently of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR. Since the DSB ends undergo nucleolytic degradation (resection) of their 5′-ending strands, we investigated the contribution of resection in this DSB-induced transcriptional inhibition. We discovered that resection-defective mutants fail to stop transcription around a DSB, and the extent of this failure correlates with the severity of the resection defect. Furthermore, Rad9 and generation of γH2A reduce this DSB-induced transcriptional inhibition by counteracting DSB resection. Therefore, the conversion of the DSB ends from double-stranded to single-stranded DNA, which is necessary to initiate DSB repair by homologous recombination, is responsible for loss of transcription around a DSB in S. cerevisiae.https://elifesciences.org/articles/08942DNA double-strand breakresectionS. cerevisiaetranscriptionRNA polymerase
spellingShingle Nicola Manfrini
Michela Clerici
Maxime Wery
Chiara Vittoria Colombo
Marc Descrimes
Antonin Morillon
Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
Maria Pia Longhese
Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
eLife
DNA double-strand break
resection
S. cerevisiae
transcription
RNA polymerase
title Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_fullStr Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full_unstemmed Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_short Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_sort resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double strand break in saccharomyces cerevisiae
topic DNA double-strand break
resection
S. cerevisiae
transcription
RNA polymerase
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/08942
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolamanfrini resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT michelaclerici resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT maximewery resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT chiaravittoriacolombo resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT marcdescrimes resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT antoninmorillon resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT fabriziodaddadifagagna resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT mariapialonghese resectionisresponsibleforlossoftranscriptionaroundadoublestrandbreakinsaccharomycescerevisiae