Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?

<p>With the increase in the number of available global climate models (GCMs), pragmatic questions come up in using them to quantify climate change impacts on hydrology: is it necessary to unequally weight GCM outputs in the impact studies, and if so, how should they be weighted? Some weighting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H.-M. Wang, J. Chen, C.-Y. Xu, H. Chen, S. Guo, P. Xie, X. Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-09-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/4033/2019/hess-23-4033-2019.pdf
_version_ 1818298468288954368
author H.-M. Wang
J. Chen
C.-Y. Xu
C.-Y. Xu
H. Chen
S. Guo
P. Xie
X. Li
author_facet H.-M. Wang
J. Chen
C.-Y. Xu
C.-Y. Xu
H. Chen
S. Guo
P. Xie
X. Li
author_sort H.-M. Wang
collection DOAJ
description <p>With the increase in the number of available global climate models (GCMs), pragmatic questions come up in using them to quantify climate change impacts on hydrology: is it necessary to unequally weight GCM outputs in the impact studies, and if so, how should they be weighted? Some weighting methods have been proposed based on the performances of GCM simulations with respect to reproducing the observed climate. However, the process from climate variables to hydrological responses is nonlinear, and thus the assigned weights based on performances of GCMs in climate simulations may not be correctly translated to hydrological responses. Assigning weights to GCM outputs based on their ability to represent hydrological simulations is more straightforward. Accordingly, the present study assigns weights to GCM simulations based on their ability to reproduce hydrological characteristics and investigates their influences on the quantification of hydrological impacts. Specifically, eight weighting schemes are used to determine the weights of GCM simulations based on streamflow series simulated by a lumped hydrological model using raw or bias-corrected GCM outputs. The impacts of weighting GCM simulations are investigated in terms of reproducing the observed hydrological regimes for the reference period (1970–1999) and quantifying the uncertainty of hydrological changes for the future period (2070–2099). The results show that when using raw GCM outputs to simulate streamflows, streamflow-based weights have a better performance in reproducing observed mean hydrograph than climate-variable-based weights. However, when bias correction is applied to GCM simulations before driving the hydrological model, the streamflow-based unequal weights do not bring significant differences in the multi-model ensemble mean and uncertainty of hydrological impacts, since bias-corrected climate simulations become rather close to observations. Thus, it is likely that using bias correction and equal weighting is viable and sufficient for hydrological impact studies.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T04:35:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a29b121ed69d4a9d8711f57ed24b097e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T04:35:48Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a29b121ed69d4a9d8711f57ed24b097e2022-12-21T23:59:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382019-09-01234033405010.5194/hess-23-4033-2019Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?H.-M. Wang0J. Chen1C.-Y. Xu2C.-Y. Xu3H. Chen4S. Guo5P. Xie6X. Li7State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, ChinaDepartment of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China<p>With the increase in the number of available global climate models (GCMs), pragmatic questions come up in using them to quantify climate change impacts on hydrology: is it necessary to unequally weight GCM outputs in the impact studies, and if so, how should they be weighted? Some weighting methods have been proposed based on the performances of GCM simulations with respect to reproducing the observed climate. However, the process from climate variables to hydrological responses is nonlinear, and thus the assigned weights based on performances of GCMs in climate simulations may not be correctly translated to hydrological responses. Assigning weights to GCM outputs based on their ability to represent hydrological simulations is more straightforward. Accordingly, the present study assigns weights to GCM simulations based on their ability to reproduce hydrological characteristics and investigates their influences on the quantification of hydrological impacts. Specifically, eight weighting schemes are used to determine the weights of GCM simulations based on streamflow series simulated by a lumped hydrological model using raw or bias-corrected GCM outputs. The impacts of weighting GCM simulations are investigated in terms of reproducing the observed hydrological regimes for the reference period (1970–1999) and quantifying the uncertainty of hydrological changes for the future period (2070–2099). The results show that when using raw GCM outputs to simulate streamflows, streamflow-based weights have a better performance in reproducing observed mean hydrograph than climate-variable-based weights. However, when bias correction is applied to GCM simulations before driving the hydrological model, the streamflow-based unequal weights do not bring significant differences in the multi-model ensemble mean and uncertainty of hydrological impacts, since bias-corrected climate simulations become rather close to observations. Thus, it is likely that using bias correction and equal weighting is viable and sufficient for hydrological impact studies.</p>https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/4033/2019/hess-23-4033-2019.pdf
spellingShingle H.-M. Wang
J. Chen
C.-Y. Xu
C.-Y. Xu
H. Chen
S. Guo
P. Xie
X. Li
Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?
title_full Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?
title_fullStr Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?
title_full_unstemmed Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?
title_short Does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts?
title_sort does the weighting of climate simulations result in a better quantification of hydrological impacts
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/4033/2019/hess-23-4033-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hmwang doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT jchen doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT cyxu doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT cyxu doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT hchen doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT sguo doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT pxie doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts
AT xli doestheweightingofclimatesimulationsresultinabetterquantificationofhydrologicalimpacts