Comparison of the effects of using feedback devices for training or simulated cardiopulmonary arrest
Abstract Background High-quality chest compression is essential for successful cardiac arrest resuscitation. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest. However, bystanders untrained in cardiopulmonary resuscitat...
Main Authors: | Jinghao Jiang, Jinghuang Yan, Dongai Yao, Jinsong Xiao, Rongtao Chen, Yan Zhao, Xiaoqing Jin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02669-z |
Similar Items
-
Community‐Wide Dissemination of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Use Using a 45‐Minute Chest Compression–Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training
by: Chika Nishiyama, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Is it time to consider visual feedback systems the gold standard for chest compression skill acquisition?
by: Andrea Cortegiani, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Complications of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for unconscious patients without cardiopulmonary arrest
by: Yoshihiro Moriwaki, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Prognostic Impact of In-Hospital Use of Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices Compared with Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Nationwide Population-Based Observational Study in South Korea
by: Wonhee Kim, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
LUCAS Versus Manual Chest Compression During Ambulance Transport: A Hemodynamic Study in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest
by: Aurora Magliocca, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)