Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions

Imperfection of procedure for implementing prejudice during the judicial review of cases could cause instability of practice, which indicates relevance of the research topic regarding formulation of clear criteria for the mechanism of applying prejudice at one’s own discretion in the enforcement of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna Barikova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Academy of Internal Affairs 2023-02-01
Series:Юридичний часопис Національної академії внутрішніх справ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lawjournal.com.ua/en/article/download/preyuditsiya-shchodo-diskretsiyi-v-pravozastosuvanni-norm-finansovogo-prava
_version_ 1797447731744079872
author Anna Barikova
author_facet Anna Barikova
author_sort Anna Barikova
collection DOAJ
description Imperfection of procedure for implementing prejudice during the judicial review of cases could cause instability of practice, which indicates relevance of the research topic regarding formulation of clear criteria for the mechanism of applying prejudice at one’s own discretion in the enforcement of financial provisions of law. In view of the above, the purpose of the article is to identify peculiarities of discretionary powers bias in enforcement of financial provisions of law. The basis of the methodological toolkit is general philosophical (dialectical, hermeneutic), general scientific formal (empirical in the form of observation, description and comparison; axiomatic; hypothetical-deductive; formalization; unity of historical and logical) and specific scientific methods (formal-logical; comparative-legal; system-structural), as well as the methodology of revocation and monitoring of a preliminary judgment, which allows to investigate theoretical and practical issues of discretionary powers in the enforcement of financial and legal norms in unity of their substantive component and external form of reflection. Classification of prejudice has been proposed by: level of law enforcement; legal force of prejudice; meaning of established factual circumstances that are included in the subject of proof; nature of accusation; subject. The psychological dimension of using prejudicial categories has been studied as a metacognitive activity for establishing and taking into account values of prejudice in view of accuracy of empirical generalizations, formulating judgments to identify future consequences of decision-making with prejudicial categories given in the original decision. The article outlines the mechanism for implementing legal policy regarding the use of financial prejudicial categories, which should be based primarily on the instrumental and procedural characteristics of this model of legal influence. It has been established that in the organizational and legal aspect, conditions for the entry of the national market segment into the cross-border space are formed by streamlining interaction procedures of the subjects of legal relations through appropriate forms of legal influence. The practical value of the results is that they could be used to determine the procedure for using prejudice at the supranational and national levels, in particular, in the context of applying the practice of the Court of the European Union
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:00:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2b27c879c5d451bb5687176e92421e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2519-4216
2519-4313
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:00:10Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher National Academy of Internal Affairs
record_format Article
series Юридичний часопис Національної академії внутрішніх справ
spelling doaj.art-a2b27c879c5d451bb5687176e92421e12023-11-30T08:34:20ZengNational Academy of Internal AffairsЮридичний часопис Національної академії внутрішніх справ2519-42162519-43132023-02-01131364310.56215/naia-chasopis/1.2023.36Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisionsAnna Barikova0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9707-0106National Academy of Internal AffairsImperfection of procedure for implementing prejudice during the judicial review of cases could cause instability of practice, which indicates relevance of the research topic regarding formulation of clear criteria for the mechanism of applying prejudice at one’s own discretion in the enforcement of financial provisions of law. In view of the above, the purpose of the article is to identify peculiarities of discretionary powers bias in enforcement of financial provisions of law. The basis of the methodological toolkit is general philosophical (dialectical, hermeneutic), general scientific formal (empirical in the form of observation, description and comparison; axiomatic; hypothetical-deductive; formalization; unity of historical and logical) and specific scientific methods (formal-logical; comparative-legal; system-structural), as well as the methodology of revocation and monitoring of a preliminary judgment, which allows to investigate theoretical and practical issues of discretionary powers in the enforcement of financial and legal norms in unity of their substantive component and external form of reflection. Classification of prejudice has been proposed by: level of law enforcement; legal force of prejudice; meaning of established factual circumstances that are included in the subject of proof; nature of accusation; subject. The psychological dimension of using prejudicial categories has been studied as a metacognitive activity for establishing and taking into account values of prejudice in view of accuracy of empirical generalizations, formulating judgments to identify future consequences of decision-making with prejudicial categories given in the original decision. The article outlines the mechanism for implementing legal policy regarding the use of financial prejudicial categories, which should be based primarily on the instrumental and procedural characteristics of this model of legal influence. It has been established that in the organizational and legal aspect, conditions for the entry of the national market segment into the cross-border space are formed by streamlining interaction procedures of the subjects of legal relations through appropriate forms of legal influence. The practical value of the results is that they could be used to determine the procedure for using prejudice at the supranational and national levels, in particular, in the context of applying the practice of the Court of the European Unionhttps://lawjournal.com.ua/en/article/download/preyuditsiya-shchodo-diskretsiyi-v-pravozastosuvanni-norm-finansovogo-pravalegal frameworklegal regulationsfunctions of lawlegal interpretationevaluationpreliminary categoriesatypical regulations
spellingShingle Anna Barikova
Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
Юридичний часопис Національної академії внутрішніх справ
legal framework
legal regulations
functions of law
legal interpretation
evaluation
preliminary categories
atypical regulations
title Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
title_full Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
title_fullStr Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
title_full_unstemmed Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
title_short Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
title_sort prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions
topic legal framework
legal regulations
functions of law
legal interpretation
evaluation
preliminary categories
atypical regulations
url https://lawjournal.com.ua/en/article/download/preyuditsiya-shchodo-diskretsiyi-v-pravozastosuvanni-norm-finansovogo-prava
work_keys_str_mv AT annabarikova prejudiceondiscretioninlawenforcementoffinanciallegalprovisions