Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions

It is true that Greek and Latin writers use the indicative to assert a fact. This is not to say that what Greek and Latin writers assert by means of the indicative is a fact. This distinction is central to this article. There is widespread (in many grammar and course books) misunderstanding (or at l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jerome Moran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2017-10-01
Series:The Journal of Classics Teaching
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058631017000186/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156061211590656
author Jerome Moran
author_facet Jerome Moran
author_sort Jerome Moran
collection DOAJ
description It is true that Greek and Latin writers use the indicative to assert a fact. This is not to say that what Greek and Latin writers assert by means of the indicative is a fact. This distinction is central to this article. There is widespread (in many grammar and course books) misunderstanding (or at least misleading explanation) of the information conveyed by the forms of certain Greek and Latin constructions. The misunderstanding seems to be the result of a failure to distinguish between a fact and the writer's attitude to a fact; between what is the case and what the writer says or implies is the case; between what can and cannot be deduced about what the writer knows and does not know about the facts in question from the way in which the writer expresses himself. The misunderstanding affects more constructions in Latin than in Greek. I shall begin with the Greek constructions.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:45:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2bc412008e3400cb98ab7a7aa40ee4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-6310
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:45:12Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series The Journal of Classics Teaching
spelling doaj.art-a2bc412008e3400cb98ab7a7aa40ee4c2023-03-09T12:37:20ZengCambridge University PressThe Journal of Classics Teaching2058-63102017-10-0118202410.1017/S2058631017000186Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin ConstructionsJerome MoranIt is true that Greek and Latin writers use the indicative to assert a fact. This is not to say that what Greek and Latin writers assert by means of the indicative is a fact. This distinction is central to this article. There is widespread (in many grammar and course books) misunderstanding (or at least misleading explanation) of the information conveyed by the forms of certain Greek and Latin constructions. The misunderstanding seems to be the result of a failure to distinguish between a fact and the writer's attitude to a fact; between what is the case and what the writer says or implies is the case; between what can and cannot be deduced about what the writer knows and does not know about the facts in question from the way in which the writer expresses himself. The misunderstanding affects more constructions in Latin than in Greek. I shall begin with the Greek constructions.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058631017000186/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Jerome Moran
Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions
The Journal of Classics Teaching
title Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions
title_full Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions
title_fullStr Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions
title_full_unstemmed Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions
title_short Is That A Fact? Language And Fact In Greek And Latin Constructions
title_sort is that a fact language and fact in greek and latin constructions
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058631017000186/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT jeromemoran isthatafactlanguageandfactingreekandlatinconstructions