Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering

Martin Buber was untrained in psychology, yet his teaching provides helpful guidance for a psychological science of suffering. His ideas deserve attention at three distinct levels. For each of these, his ideas align with research findings, but also push beyond them. At the individual level, Buber’s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roger G. Tweed, Thomas P. Bergen, Kristina K. Castaneto, Andrew G. Ryder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154865/full
_version_ 1797829021193469952
author Roger G. Tweed
Roger G. Tweed
Thomas P. Bergen
Kristina K. Castaneto
Andrew G. Ryder
Andrew G. Ryder
author_facet Roger G. Tweed
Roger G. Tweed
Thomas P. Bergen
Kristina K. Castaneto
Andrew G. Ryder
Andrew G. Ryder
author_sort Roger G. Tweed
collection DOAJ
description Martin Buber was untrained in psychology, yet his teaching provides helpful guidance for a psychological science of suffering. His ideas deserve attention at three distinct levels. For each of these, his ideas align with research findings, but also push beyond them. At the individual level, Buber’s radical approach to relationships disrupts typical social cognitive cycles of suffering and can thereby build a defense against suffering. At the community level, he provides guidance that can help create a society that cares for people who suffer. At the dyadic level, Buber’s guidance also matters. His ideas point toward a therapeutic dyad that can help address suffering when the individual and community responses are not sufficient. Specifically, he guides us toward a holistic view of the person that transcends labels and also toward ineffable human relations. Here again, his ideas align with empirical research, but push beyond. Buber’s unique take on relationships has much to offer scholars seeking to understand and alleviate suffering. Some might perceive Buber as ignoring evil. That possible criticism and others deserve consideration. Nonetheless, readiness to adjust theory in response to Buber and other psychological outsiders may be valuable when developing a psychology of suffering.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:13:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2c09e0d37244c8686a5524b472435fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:13:42Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-a2c09e0d37244c8686a5524b472435fc2023-05-12T05:40:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-05-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11548651154865Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of sufferingRoger G. Tweed0Roger G. Tweed1Thomas P. Bergen2Kristina K. Castaneto3Andrew G. Ryder4Andrew G. Ryder5Department of Psychology, Douglas College, New Westminster, BC, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, BC, CanadaDepartment of Religion and Theology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Douglas College, New Westminster, BC, CanadaCentre for Clinical Research in Health and Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, CanadaCulture and Mental Health Research Unit and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, CanadaMartin Buber was untrained in psychology, yet his teaching provides helpful guidance for a psychological science of suffering. His ideas deserve attention at three distinct levels. For each of these, his ideas align with research findings, but also push beyond them. At the individual level, Buber’s radical approach to relationships disrupts typical social cognitive cycles of suffering and can thereby build a defense against suffering. At the community level, he provides guidance that can help create a society that cares for people who suffer. At the dyadic level, Buber’s guidance also matters. His ideas point toward a therapeutic dyad that can help address suffering when the individual and community responses are not sufficient. Specifically, he guides us toward a holistic view of the person that transcends labels and also toward ineffable human relations. Here again, his ideas align with empirical research, but push beyond. Buber’s unique take on relationships has much to offer scholars seeking to understand and alleviate suffering. Some might perceive Buber as ignoring evil. That possible criticism and others deserve consideration. Nonetheless, readiness to adjust theory in response to Buber and other psychological outsiders may be valuable when developing a psychology of suffering.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154865/fullMartin Buberdialoguesufferingguidepsychologypositive psychology
spellingShingle Roger G. Tweed
Roger G. Tweed
Thomas P. Bergen
Kristina K. Castaneto
Andrew G. Ryder
Andrew G. Ryder
Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering
Frontiers in Psychology
Martin Buber
dialogue
suffering
guide
psychology
positive psychology
title Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering
title_full Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering
title_fullStr Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering
title_full_unstemmed Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering
title_short Martin Buber: guide for a psychology of suffering
title_sort martin buber guide for a psychology of suffering
topic Martin Buber
dialogue
suffering
guide
psychology
positive psychology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154865/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rogergtweed martinbuberguideforapsychologyofsuffering
AT rogergtweed martinbuberguideforapsychologyofsuffering
AT thomaspbergen martinbuberguideforapsychologyofsuffering
AT kristinakcastaneto martinbuberguideforapsychologyofsuffering
AT andrewgryder martinbuberguideforapsychologyofsuffering
AT andrewgryder martinbuberguideforapsychologyofsuffering