Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics
While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of five rules of what “should” be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical d...
Main Author: | Vincent C. Müller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Connection Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1276516 |
Similar Items
-
EPSRC Principles of Robotics: commentary on safety, robots as products, and responsibility
by: Paula Boddington
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Analysis of the EPSRC Principles of Robotics in regard to key research topics
by: A. Gning, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Autonomous intelligent cars: proof that the EPSRC Principles are future-proof
by: Madeleine de Cock Buning, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
The meaning of the EPSRC principles of robotics
by: Joanna J. Bryson
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Reflections on the EPSRC Principles of Robotics from the new far-side of the law
by: Aurora Voiculescu
Published: (2017-04-01)