COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

ABSTRACT Timber application is viable in constructive systems because of its mechanical properties, suitable for structural applications in engineering. Timber is even more interesting to use since it is a renewable source. Among its several applications, timber is widely used in roofing structures,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matheus Henrique Morato Moraes, Iuri Fazolin Fraga, Wanderlei Malaquias Pereira Junior, André Luis Christoforo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade de Investigações Florestais 2022-01-01
Series:Revista Árvore
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-67622022000100204&tlng=en
_version_ 1818977549717340160
author Matheus Henrique Morato Moraes
Iuri Fazolin Fraga
Wanderlei Malaquias Pereira Junior
André Luis Christoforo
author_facet Matheus Henrique Morato Moraes
Iuri Fazolin Fraga
Wanderlei Malaquias Pereira Junior
André Luis Christoforo
author_sort Matheus Henrique Morato Moraes
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Timber application is viable in constructive systems because of its mechanical properties, suitable for structural applications in engineering. Timber is even more interesting to use since it is a renewable source. Among its several applications, timber is widely used in roofing structures, with several typologies of trusses. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the behavior of plane truss in different loading conditions, including dead load, service load, and wind suction load. The mechanical performance of two trusses (Pratt and Scissor) was analyzed and compared, according to the Brazilian standard of timber structures ABNT NBR 7190 (1997) (methods and calculus premises), with the finite element method, an algorithm of swarm intelligence optimization (structure weight minimization), and a parametric study. Based on minimum weight and maximum displacement as a function of span variation, Pratt typology presented lower weight (3–19%) when compared with Scissor, under the same span and loading conditions. Regarding maximum displacements, Pratt typology presented lower displacement values than the Scissor typology. The difference between these values ranged from two to seven times, indicating that Scissor typology can better distribute normal loads (maximum displacement closer to the normative limit displacement). Variance analysis (5% of significance) confirmed these results.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:29:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2c5b9410e85473baa2e22a95ec94840
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-9088
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:29:31Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Sociedade de Investigações Florestais
record_format Article
series Revista Árvore
spelling doaj.art-a2c5b9410e85473baa2e22a95ec948402022-12-21T19:33:17ZengSociedade de Investigações FlorestaisRevista Árvore1806-90882022-01-014610.1590/1806-908820220000004COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCEMatheus Henrique Morato Moraeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7285-1344Iuri Fazolin Fragahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0310-0237Wanderlei Malaquias Pereira Juniorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-3666André Luis Christoforohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4066-080XABSTRACT Timber application is viable in constructive systems because of its mechanical properties, suitable for structural applications in engineering. Timber is even more interesting to use since it is a renewable source. Among its several applications, timber is widely used in roofing structures, with several typologies of trusses. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the behavior of plane truss in different loading conditions, including dead load, service load, and wind suction load. The mechanical performance of two trusses (Pratt and Scissor) was analyzed and compared, according to the Brazilian standard of timber structures ABNT NBR 7190 (1997) (methods and calculus premises), with the finite element method, an algorithm of swarm intelligence optimization (structure weight minimization), and a parametric study. Based on minimum weight and maximum displacement as a function of span variation, Pratt typology presented lower weight (3–19%) when compared with Scissor, under the same span and loading conditions. Regarding maximum displacements, Pratt typology presented lower displacement values than the Scissor typology. The difference between these values ranged from two to seven times, indicating that Scissor typology can better distribute normal loads (maximum displacement closer to the normative limit displacement). Variance analysis (5% of significance) confirmed these results.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-67622022000100204&tlng=enPrattScissorOptimization
spellingShingle Matheus Henrique Morato Moraes
Iuri Fazolin Fraga
Wanderlei Malaquias Pereira Junior
André Luis Christoforo
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Revista Árvore
Pratt
Scissor
Optimization
title COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
title_full COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
title_short COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TIMBER TRUSSES STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES APPLYING COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
title_sort comparative analysis of the mechanical performance of timber trusses structural typologies applying computational intelligence
topic Pratt
Scissor
Optimization
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-67622022000100204&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT matheushenriquemoratomoraes comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalperformanceoftimbertrussesstructuraltypologiesapplyingcomputationalintelligence
AT iurifazolinfraga comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalperformanceoftimbertrussesstructuraltypologiesapplyingcomputationalintelligence
AT wanderleimalaquiaspereirajunior comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalperformanceoftimbertrussesstructuraltypologiesapplyingcomputationalintelligence
AT andreluischristoforo comparativeanalysisofthemechanicalperformanceoftimbertrussesstructuraltypologiesapplyingcomputationalintelligence