Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series

Objective: The aim of this work was to describe the early and late success rates of cephalic vein cut down (CVC) in the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) for chemotherapy treatment in oncological patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1 047 TIVAP performed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ángel Barba Vélez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:EJVES Vascular Forum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X23000473
_version_ 1797787207074840576
author Ángel Barba Vélez
author_facet Ángel Barba Vélez
author_sort Ángel Barba Vélez
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this work was to describe the early and late success rates of cephalic vein cut down (CVC) in the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) for chemotherapy treatment in oncological patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1 047 TIVAP performed in a private institution between 2008 and 2021. The CVC with pre-operative ultrasound (PUS) was the initial approach. All cephalic veins (CVs) were mapped pre-operatively with Doppler ultrasound, measuring their diameter and course in oncological patients who required a TIVAP. With a CV diameter ≥ 3.2 mm TIVAP was carried out by CVC; with CV diameter < 3.2 mm, subclavian vein puncture (SVP) was performed. Results: 1 047 TIVAPs were implanted in 998 patients. The mean age was 61.5 ± 11.5 years, 624 were women (65.5%). Male patients were significantly older and with a higher incidence of colonic, digestive system, and laryngeal cancer. Initially, TIVAP was indicated in 858 cases (82%) by CVC and 189 (18%) by SVP. The success rate was 98.5% for CVC and 98.4% for SVP. There were no complications for CVC (0%) but five early complications (2.5%) in the SVP group. The rates of late complications were 4.4% in the CVC group and 5.0% in the SVP group, foreign body infection being the most frequent (57.5% of the cases) (p = .85). Conclusion: The CVC or SVP using PUS for TIVAP deployment, performed through a single incision, is a safe and effective technique. This open but minimally invasive technique should be considered in oncological patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:19:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a2dcf4e2bea04f72b6eff5f1836dc1ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-688X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:19:41Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series EJVES Vascular Forum
spelling doaj.art-a2dcf4e2bea04f72b6eff5f1836dc1ec2023-07-05T05:17:11ZengElsevierEJVES Vascular Forum2666-688X2023-01-015927Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution SeriesÁngel Barba Vélez0Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, IMQ Zorrotzaurre University Hospital, Ballets Olaeta Kalea, 4, Bilbao, SpainObjective: The aim of this work was to describe the early and late success rates of cephalic vein cut down (CVC) in the implantation of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) for chemotherapy treatment in oncological patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1 047 TIVAP performed in a private institution between 2008 and 2021. The CVC with pre-operative ultrasound (PUS) was the initial approach. All cephalic veins (CVs) were mapped pre-operatively with Doppler ultrasound, measuring their diameter and course in oncological patients who required a TIVAP. With a CV diameter ≥ 3.2 mm TIVAP was carried out by CVC; with CV diameter < 3.2 mm, subclavian vein puncture (SVP) was performed. Results: 1 047 TIVAPs were implanted in 998 patients. The mean age was 61.5 ± 11.5 years, 624 were women (65.5%). Male patients were significantly older and with a higher incidence of colonic, digestive system, and laryngeal cancer. Initially, TIVAP was indicated in 858 cases (82%) by CVC and 189 (18%) by SVP. The success rate was 98.5% for CVC and 98.4% for SVP. There were no complications for CVC (0%) but five early complications (2.5%) in the SVP group. The rates of late complications were 4.4% in the CVC group and 5.0% in the SVP group, foreign body infection being the most frequent (57.5% of the cases) (p = .85). Conclusion: The CVC or SVP using PUS for TIVAP deployment, performed through a single incision, is a safe and effective technique. This open but minimally invasive technique should be considered in oncological patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X23000473ComplicationsCephalic Vein Cut downPre-operative ultrasoundSuccess rateTotally implantable venous access ports
spellingShingle Ángel Barba Vélez
Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series
EJVES Vascular Forum
Complications
Cephalic Vein Cut down
Pre-operative ultrasound
Success rate
Totally implantable venous access ports
title Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series
title_full Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series
title_fullStr Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series
title_full_unstemmed Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series
title_short Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series
title_sort cephalic vein cut down for total implantable venous access ports a retrospective review of a single institution series
topic Complications
Cephalic Vein Cut down
Pre-operative ultrasound
Success rate
Totally implantable venous access ports
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X23000473
work_keys_str_mv AT angelbarbavelez cephalicveincutdownfortotalimplantablevenousaccessportsaretrospectivereviewofasingleinstitutionseries