The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of three finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-manufactured composite resins. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Nano-ceramic Ceram-X (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), nano-filled Premise (Kerr Corporation, Ora...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Gazi University
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | Acta Odontologica Turcica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/gaziaot/article/view/5000109271/5000165772 |
| _version_ | 1797919316872527872 |
|---|---|
| author | Didem Atabek Elif Sungurtekin Ekçi Mehmet Bani Nurhan Öztaş |
| author_facet | Didem Atabek Elif Sungurtekin Ekçi Mehmet Bani Nurhan Öztaş |
| author_sort | Didem Atabek |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of three finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-manufactured composite resins.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: Nano-ceramic Ceram-X (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), nano-filled Premise (Kerr Corporation, Orange, NJ, USA) and nano-filled Clearfil Majestic (Kuraray Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan) composite resins were tested. Forty samples of each material were cured under matrix strips. The samples were then randomly assigned into four test groups: 1) unpolished; 2) polished with burs out of resin reinforced by zircon-rich glass fiber (Stainbuster, Abrasive Technology, Inc., Lewis Center, OH, USA); 3) polished with aluminum oxide impregnated polymer points (Enhance Finishing System, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) followed by diamond impregnated micro-polishing points (PoGo, Dentsply Caulk); and 4) polished with aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex, Dentsply Caulk). The sample surface roughness values (Ra) were determined using a profilometer, and the surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in surface roughness were detected among the finishing and polishing systems (p>0.05). However, all finishing and polishing techniques created statistically rougher surfaces than the control group (p<0.05). The mean Ra values of the finishing and polishing systems were ranked as follows: Mylar strip < Enhance Finishing System+PoGo < Stainbuster < Sof-Lex. These findings were confirmed by scanning electron microscope photomicrographs.
CONCLUSION: All polishing systems produced clinically acceptable surface roughness on the tested composite materials. The smoothest surfaces were achieved using the nano-ceramic composites with the Enhance Finishing System and PoGo. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T13:43:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a2ed22eb86784d00a69533e1837c9b3e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2147-690X 2147-690X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T13:43:50Z |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | Gazi University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Odontologica Turcica |
| spelling | doaj.art-a2ed22eb86784d00a69533e1837c9b3e2023-02-15T16:11:04ZengGazi UniversityActa Odontologica Turcica2147-690X2147-690X2016-05-01332697410.17214/aot.99872The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resinsDidem AtabekElif Sungurtekin EkçiMehmet BaniNurhan ÖztaşOBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of three finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-manufactured composite resins. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Nano-ceramic Ceram-X (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), nano-filled Premise (Kerr Corporation, Orange, NJ, USA) and nano-filled Clearfil Majestic (Kuraray Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan) composite resins were tested. Forty samples of each material were cured under matrix strips. The samples were then randomly assigned into four test groups: 1) unpolished; 2) polished with burs out of resin reinforced by zircon-rich glass fiber (Stainbuster, Abrasive Technology, Inc., Lewis Center, OH, USA); 3) polished with aluminum oxide impregnated polymer points (Enhance Finishing System, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) followed by diamond impregnated micro-polishing points (PoGo, Dentsply Caulk); and 4) polished with aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex, Dentsply Caulk). The sample surface roughness values (Ra) were determined using a profilometer, and the surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in surface roughness were detected among the finishing and polishing systems (p>0.05). However, all finishing and polishing techniques created statistically rougher surfaces than the control group (p<0.05). The mean Ra values of the finishing and polishing systems were ranked as follows: Mylar strip < Enhance Finishing System+PoGo < Stainbuster < Sof-Lex. These findings were confirmed by scanning electron microscope photomicrographs. CONCLUSION: All polishing systems produced clinically acceptable surface roughness on the tested composite materials. The smoothest surfaces were achieved using the nano-ceramic composites with the Enhance Finishing System and PoGo.http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/gaziaot/article/view/5000109271/5000165772KonstanzGermany)nano-filled Premise (Kerr CorporationOrangeNJUSA) and nano-filled Clearfil Majestic (Kuraray Medical Inc.TokyoJapan) composite resins were tested. Forty samples of each material were cured under matrix strips. The samples were then randomly assigned into four test groups: 1) unpolished; 2) polished with burs out of resin reinforced by zircon-rich glass fiber (StainbusterAbrasive TechnologyInc.Lewis CenterOHUSA); 3) polished with aluminum oxide impregnated polymer points (Enhance Finishing SystemDentsply CaulkMilfordDEUSA) followed by diamond impregnated micro-polishing points (PoGoDentsply Caulk); and 4) polished with aluminum oxide disks (Sof-LexDentsply Caulk). The sample surface roughness values (Ra) were determined using a profilometerand the surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in surface roughness were detected among the finishing and polishing systems (p>0.05). HoweverComposite dental resindental estheticdental polishing |
| spellingShingle | Didem Atabek Elif Sungurtekin Ekçi Mehmet Bani Nurhan Öztaş The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins Acta Odontologica Turcica Konstanz Germany) nano-filled Premise (Kerr Corporation Orange NJ USA) and nano-filled Clearfil Majestic (Kuraray Medical Inc. Tokyo Japan) composite resins were tested. Forty samples of each material were cured under matrix strips. The samples were then randomly assigned into four test groups: 1) unpolished; 2) polished with burs out of resin reinforced by zircon-rich glass fiber (Stainbuster Abrasive Technology Inc. Lewis Center OH USA); 3) polished with aluminum oxide impregnated polymer points (Enhance Finishing System Dentsply Caulk Milford DE USA) followed by diamond impregnated micro-polishing points (PoGo Dentsply Caulk); and 4) polished with aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex Dentsply Caulk). The sample surface roughness values (Ra) were determined using a profilometer and the surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in surface roughness were detected among the finishing and polishing systems (p>0.05). However Composite dental resin dental esthetic dental polishing |
| title | The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins |
| title_full | The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins |
| title_fullStr | The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins |
| title_short | The effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins |
| title_sort | effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness of composite resins |
| topic | Konstanz Germany) nano-filled Premise (Kerr Corporation Orange NJ USA) and nano-filled Clearfil Majestic (Kuraray Medical Inc. Tokyo Japan) composite resins were tested. Forty samples of each material were cured under matrix strips. The samples were then randomly assigned into four test groups: 1) unpolished; 2) polished with burs out of resin reinforced by zircon-rich glass fiber (Stainbuster Abrasive Technology Inc. Lewis Center OH USA); 3) polished with aluminum oxide impregnated polymer points (Enhance Finishing System Dentsply Caulk Milford DE USA) followed by diamond impregnated micro-polishing points (PoGo Dentsply Caulk); and 4) polished with aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex Dentsply Caulk). The sample surface roughness values (Ra) were determined using a profilometer and the surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in surface roughness were detected among the finishing and polishing systems (p>0.05). However Composite dental resin dental esthetic dental polishing |
| url | http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/gaziaot/article/view/5000109271/5000165772 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT didematabek theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT elifsungurtekinekci theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT mehmetbani theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT nurhanoztas theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT didematabek effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT elifsungurtekinekci effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT mehmetbani effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins AT nurhanoztas effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonthesurfaceroughnessofcompositeresins |