Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections

Modeling a structure in the virtual world using three-dimensional (3D) information enhances our understanding, while also aiding in the visualization, of how a structure reacts to any disturbance. Generally, 3D point clouds are used for determining structural behavioral changes. Light detection and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Bekele Maru, Donghwan Lee, Kassahun Demissie Tola, Seunghee Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/1/201
_version_ 1797543100697018368
author Michael Bekele Maru
Donghwan Lee
Kassahun Demissie Tola
Seunghee Park
author_facet Michael Bekele Maru
Donghwan Lee
Kassahun Demissie Tola
Seunghee Park
author_sort Michael Bekele Maru
collection DOAJ
description Modeling a structure in the virtual world using three-dimensional (3D) information enhances our understanding, while also aiding in the visualization, of how a structure reacts to any disturbance. Generally, 3D point clouds are used for determining structural behavioral changes. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is one of the crucial ways by which a 3D point cloud dataset can be generated. Additionally, 3D cameras are commonly used to develop a point cloud containing many points on the external surface of an object around it. The main objective of this study was to compare the performance of optical sensors, namely a depth camera (DC) and terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) in estimating structural deflection. We also utilized bilateral filtering techniques, which are commonly used in image processing, on the point cloud data for enhancing their accuracy and increasing the application prospects of these sensors in structure health monitoring. The results from these sensors were validated by comparing them with the outputs from a linear variable differential transformer sensor, which was mounted on the beam during an indoor experiment. The results showed that the datasets obtained from both the sensors were acceptable for nominal deflections of 3 mm and above because the error range was less than <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. However, the result obtained from the TLS were better than those obtained from the DC.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:39:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a306351e76204603b7ee061339d9a3aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:39:55Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-a306351e76204603b7ee061339d9a3aa2023-11-21T03:09:39ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-12-0121120110.3390/s21010201Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural DeflectionsMichael Bekele Maru0Donghwan Lee1Kassahun Demissie Tola2Seunghee Park3Department of the Civil, Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, KoreaDepartment of Convergence Engineering for Future City, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, KoreaDepartment of the Civil, Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, KoreaSchool of Civil, Architectural Engineering and Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, KoreaModeling a structure in the virtual world using three-dimensional (3D) information enhances our understanding, while also aiding in the visualization, of how a structure reacts to any disturbance. Generally, 3D point clouds are used for determining structural behavioral changes. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is one of the crucial ways by which a 3D point cloud dataset can be generated. Additionally, 3D cameras are commonly used to develop a point cloud containing many points on the external surface of an object around it. The main objective of this study was to compare the performance of optical sensors, namely a depth camera (DC) and terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) in estimating structural deflection. We also utilized bilateral filtering techniques, which are commonly used in image processing, on the point cloud data for enhancing their accuracy and increasing the application prospects of these sensors in structure health monitoring. The results from these sensors were validated by comparing them with the outputs from a linear variable differential transformer sensor, which was mounted on the beam during an indoor experiment. The results showed that the datasets obtained from both the sensors were acceptable for nominal deflections of 3 mm and above because the error range was less than <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. However, the result obtained from the TLS were better than those obtained from the DC.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/1/201terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)depth camera (DC)hausdorff distancebilateral filteringpoint clouddeflection
spellingShingle Michael Bekele Maru
Donghwan Lee
Kassahun Demissie Tola
Seunghee Park
Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections
Sensors
terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)
depth camera (DC)
hausdorff distance
bilateral filtering
point cloud
deflection
title Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections
title_full Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections
title_fullStr Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections
title_short Comparison of Depth Camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Monitoring Structural Deflections
title_sort comparison of depth camera and terrestrial laser scanner in monitoring structural deflections
topic terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)
depth camera (DC)
hausdorff distance
bilateral filtering
point cloud
deflection
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/1/201
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelbekelemaru comparisonofdepthcameraandterrestriallaserscannerinmonitoringstructuraldeflections
AT donghwanlee comparisonofdepthcameraandterrestriallaserscannerinmonitoringstructuraldeflections
AT kassahundemissietola comparisonofdepthcameraandterrestriallaserscannerinmonitoringstructuraldeflections
AT seungheepark comparisonofdepthcameraandterrestriallaserscannerinmonitoringstructuraldeflections