Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States

Two experiments were conducted in mixed hardwood-conifer forests in the northeastern United States to test the effects of cleaning surfactant and non-surfactant treated multiple-funnel traps used to catch bark and woodboring beetles. Large amounts of pollen and other debris often form a crust on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin J. Dodds, Marc F. DiGirolomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/10/702
_version_ 1797550949332418560
author Kevin J. Dodds
Marc F. DiGirolomo
author_facet Kevin J. Dodds
Marc F. DiGirolomo
author_sort Kevin J. Dodds
collection DOAJ
description Two experiments were conducted in mixed hardwood-conifer forests in the northeastern United States to test the effects of cleaning surfactant and non-surfactant treated multiple-funnel traps used to catch bark and woodboring beetles. Large amounts of pollen and other debris often form a crust on the interior of traps (personal observations). Such surface deposits may provide footholds for beetles to escape capture in traps. In one experiment, we tested cleaned surfactant and non-surfactant traps against non-cleaned surfactant and non-surfactant traps. In a second experiment, we tested field cleaning of modified multiple-funnel traps as an alternative to substituting clean traps on each collection visit. There was no effect of surfactant treated traps, cleaned or not, on total beetles or individual bark beetle species captured. However, in situ cleaned traps were statistically better at capturing total beetles, total bark beetles, and several bark beetle species than non-cleaned control traps. Surfactant-treated non-modified traps and cleaned modified traps had higher species richness and abundance than other treatments at the site level. Our results suggest that cleaning traps to remove accumulated pollen and debris may be helpful for some species but would have limited benefit for broad-scale trapping of bark and woodboring beetles in northeastern forests.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:37:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3088add2ede474ca99019c2cbce2038
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4450
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:37:43Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Insects
spelling doaj.art-a3088add2ede474ca99019c2cbce20382023-11-20T17:07:54ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502020-10-01111070210.3390/insects11100702Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United StatesKevin J. Dodds0Marc F. DiGirolomo1U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Region 9 State and Private Forestry, 271 Mast Road, Durham, NH 03824, USAU.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Region 9 State and Private Forestry, 271 Mast Road, Durham, NH 03824, USATwo experiments were conducted in mixed hardwood-conifer forests in the northeastern United States to test the effects of cleaning surfactant and non-surfactant treated multiple-funnel traps used to catch bark and woodboring beetles. Large amounts of pollen and other debris often form a crust on the interior of traps (personal observations). Such surface deposits may provide footholds for beetles to escape capture in traps. In one experiment, we tested cleaned surfactant and non-surfactant traps against non-cleaned surfactant and non-surfactant traps. In a second experiment, we tested field cleaning of modified multiple-funnel traps as an alternative to substituting clean traps on each collection visit. There was no effect of surfactant treated traps, cleaned or not, on total beetles or individual bark beetle species captured. However, in situ cleaned traps were statistically better at capturing total beetles, total bark beetles, and several bark beetle species than non-cleaned control traps. Surfactant-treated non-modified traps and cleaned modified traps had higher species richness and abundance than other treatments at the site level. Our results suggest that cleaning traps to remove accumulated pollen and debris may be helpful for some species but would have limited benefit for broad-scale trapping of bark and woodboring beetles in northeastern forests.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/10/702Teflonsurfactantsurveytrappingtrap maintenance
spellingShingle Kevin J. Dodds
Marc F. DiGirolomo
Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
Insects
Teflon
surfactant
survey
trapping
trap maintenance
title Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
title_full Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
title_fullStr Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
title_short Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
title_sort effect of cleaning multiple funnel traps on captures of bark and woodboring beetles in northeastern united states
topic Teflon
surfactant
survey
trapping
trap maintenance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/10/702
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinjdodds effectofcleaningmultiplefunneltrapsoncapturesofbarkandwoodboringbeetlesinnortheasternunitedstates
AT marcfdigirolomo effectofcleaningmultiplefunneltrapsoncapturesofbarkandwoodboringbeetlesinnortheasternunitedstates