Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses

AIM: To evaluate the refractive correction for standard automated perimetry (SAP) in eyes with refractive multifocal contact lenses (CL) in healthy young participants. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 participants were included. Accommodation was paralyzed in all participants with 1% cyclopentolate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazunori Hirasawa, Hikaru Ito, Yukari Ohori, Yui Takano, Nobuyuki Shoji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2017-10-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2017/10/20171013.pdf
_version_ 1818283496555151360
author Kazunori Hirasawa
Hikaru Ito
Yukari Ohori
Yui Takano
Nobuyuki Shoji
author_facet Kazunori Hirasawa
Hikaru Ito
Yukari Ohori
Yui Takano
Nobuyuki Shoji
author_sort Kazunori Hirasawa
collection DOAJ
description AIM: To evaluate the refractive correction for standard automated perimetry (SAP) in eyes with refractive multifocal contact lenses (CL) in healthy young participants. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 participants were included. Accommodation was paralyzed in all participants with 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride. SAP was performed using the Humphrey SITA-standard 24-2 and 10-2 protocol under three refractive conditions: monofocal CL corrected for near distance (baseline); multifocal CL corrected for distance (mCL-D); and mCL-D corrected for near vision using a spectacle lens (mCL-N). Primary outcome measures were the foveal threshold, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD). RESULTS: The foveal threshold of mCL-N with both the 24-2 and 10-2 protocols significantly decreased by 2.2-2.5 dB CONCLUSION: Despite the induced mydriasis and the optical design of the multifocal lens used in this study, our results indicated that, when the dome-shaped visual field test is performed with eyes with large pupils and wearing refractive multifocal CLs, distance correction without additional near correction is to be recommended.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T00:37:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a31ac7f76d964b17896c29d41f785d16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T00:37:50Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-a31ac7f76d964b17896c29d41f785d162022-12-22T00:05:12ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982017-10-0110101559156510.18240/ijo.2017.10.13Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lensesKazunori Hirasawa0Hikaru Ito1Yukari Ohori2Yui Takano3Nobuyuki Shoji4Department of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, JapanDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, JapanDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, JapanDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, JapanAIM: To evaluate the refractive correction for standard automated perimetry (SAP) in eyes with refractive multifocal contact lenses (CL) in healthy young participants. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 participants were included. Accommodation was paralyzed in all participants with 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride. SAP was performed using the Humphrey SITA-standard 24-2 and 10-2 protocol under three refractive conditions: monofocal CL corrected for near distance (baseline); multifocal CL corrected for distance (mCL-D); and mCL-D corrected for near vision using a spectacle lens (mCL-N). Primary outcome measures were the foveal threshold, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD). RESULTS: The foveal threshold of mCL-N with both the 24-2 and 10-2 protocols significantly decreased by 2.2-2.5 dB CONCLUSION: Despite the induced mydriasis and the optical design of the multifocal lens used in this study, our results indicated that, when the dome-shaped visual field test is performed with eyes with large pupils and wearing refractive multifocal CLs, distance correction without additional near correction is to be recommended.http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2017/10/20171013.pdf1565intraocular lensmultifocal contact lensrefractive correctionstandard automated perimetryvisual field
spellingShingle Kazunori Hirasawa
Hikaru Ito
Yukari Ohori
Yui Takano
Nobuyuki Shoji
Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
International Journal of Ophthalmology
1565
intraocular lens
multifocal contact lens
refractive correction
standard automated perimetry
visual field
title Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
title_full Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
title_fullStr Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
title_short Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
title_sort evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses
topic 1565
intraocular lens
multifocal contact lens
refractive correction
standard automated perimetry
visual field
url http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2017/10/20171013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kazunorihirasawa evaluationofrefractivecorrectionforstandardautomatedperimetryineyeswearingmultifocalcontactlenses
AT hikaruito evaluationofrefractivecorrectionforstandardautomatedperimetryineyeswearingmultifocalcontactlenses
AT yukariohori evaluationofrefractivecorrectionforstandardautomatedperimetryineyeswearingmultifocalcontactlenses
AT yuitakano evaluationofrefractivecorrectionforstandardautomatedperimetryineyeswearingmultifocalcontactlenses
AT nobuyukishoji evaluationofrefractivecorrectionforstandardautomatedperimetryineyeswearingmultifocalcontactlenses