IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI

The practice of the implementation of the Regional Head Election is always accompanied by disputes and conflicts. Through UU No. 12 Tahun 2008 on Amendment to UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 on Regional Government, the dispute over the General Election of Regional Head has been transferred from the Supreme Co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johani Wilmen, Philips Adrianus Kana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti 2019-03-01
Series:Unes Journal of Swara Justisia
Online Access:https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/9
_version_ 1797317602011250688
author Johani Wilmen
Philips Adrianus Kana
author_facet Johani Wilmen
Philips Adrianus Kana
author_sort Johani Wilmen
collection DOAJ
description The practice of the implementation of the Regional Head Election is always accompanied by disputes and conflicts. Through UU No. 12 Tahun 2008 on Amendment to UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 on Regional Government, the dispute over the General Election of Regional Head has been transferred from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court. The locus dispute settlement dispute is regulated in Article 236 C of UU No. 12 Year 2008. The change of dispute resolution to the Constitutional Court brings new hope because the settlement by the Constitutional Court is relatively not cause a significant conflict, so that democracy goes well. This is proven one of them is the settlement of disputes result of General Election of Head of Kerinci Regency by Constitutional Court with Decision No 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013. With the result of the decision of the Constitutional Court it can be ascertained that about the certainty of the elected Regent and Vice Regent Kerinci candidate who will lead Kerinci 5 years ahead. This research is normative research, that is studying result of Constitutional Court Decision No. 125/ PHPU.D-XI / 2013 about Dispute of Result of General Election of Region Head of Kerinci Regency.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:38:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a31e237e812d4d04a9501704e0e0daf0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2579-4701
2579-4914
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T03:38:20Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti
record_format Article
series Unes Journal of Swara Justisia
spelling doaj.art-a31e237e812d4d04a9501704e0e0daf02024-02-10T01:21:25ZengProgram Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas EkasaktiUnes Journal of Swara Justisia2579-47012579-49142019-03-0111IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASIJohani WilmenPhilips Adrianus Kana0Universitas Ekasakti The practice of the implementation of the Regional Head Election is always accompanied by disputes and conflicts. Through UU No. 12 Tahun 2008 on Amendment to UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 on Regional Government, the dispute over the General Election of Regional Head has been transferred from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court. The locus dispute settlement dispute is regulated in Article 236 C of UU No. 12 Year 2008. The change of dispute resolution to the Constitutional Court brings new hope because the settlement by the Constitutional Court is relatively not cause a significant conflict, so that democracy goes well. This is proven one of them is the settlement of disputes result of General Election of Head of Kerinci Regency by Constitutional Court with Decision No 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013. With the result of the decision of the Constitutional Court it can be ascertained that about the certainty of the elected Regent and Vice Regent Kerinci candidate who will lead Kerinci 5 years ahead. This research is normative research, that is studying result of Constitutional Court Decision No. 125/ PHPU.D-XI / 2013 about Dispute of Result of General Election of Region Head of Kerinci Regency. https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/9
spellingShingle Johani Wilmen
Philips Adrianus Kana
IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI
Unes Journal of Swara Justisia
title IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI
title_full IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI
title_fullStr IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI
title_full_unstemmed IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI
title_short IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR : 125/PHPU.D-XI/2013 TENTANG PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN KERINCI TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN DEMOKRASI
title_sort implikasi yuridis putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 125 phpu d xi 2013 tentang perselisihan hasil pemilihan umum kepala daerah kabupaten kerinci terhadap perkembangan demokrasi
url https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/9
work_keys_str_mv AT johaniwilmen implikasiyuridisputusanmahkamahkonstitusinomor125phpudxi2013tentangperselisihanhasilpemilihanumumkepaladaerahkabupatenkerinciterhadapperkembangandemokrasi
AT philipsadrianuskana implikasiyuridisputusanmahkamahkonstitusinomor125phpudxi2013tentangperselisihanhasilpemilihanumumkepaladaerahkabupatenkerinciterhadapperkembangandemokrasi