Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex

Near-infrared light stimulation of the brain has been claimed to improve deficits caused by traumatic brain injury and stroke. Here, we exploit the effect of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) as a tool to modulate cortical excitability in the healthy human brain. tNIRS was applied at a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leila eChaieb, Andrea eAntal, Florentin eMasurat, Walter ePaulus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00147/full
_version_ 1811215785824092160
author Leila eChaieb
Andrea eAntal
Florentin eMasurat
Walter ePaulus
author_facet Leila eChaieb
Andrea eAntal
Florentin eMasurat
Walter ePaulus
author_sort Leila eChaieb
collection DOAJ
description Near-infrared light stimulation of the brain has been claimed to improve deficits caused by traumatic brain injury and stroke. Here, we exploit the effect of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) as a tool to modulate cortical excitability in the healthy human brain. tNIRS was applied at a wavelength of 810 nm for 10 minutes over the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1). Both single-pulse and paired-pulse measures of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were used to assess levels of cortical excitability in the corticospinal pathway and intracortical circuits. The serial reaction time task (SRTT) was used to investigate the possible effect of tNIRS on implicit learning.By evaluating the mean amplitude of single-pulse TMS elicited motor-evoked-potentials (MEPs) a significant decrease of the amplitude was observed up to 30 minutes post-stimulation, compared to baseline. Furthermore, the short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) was increased and facilitation (ICF) decreased significantly after tNIRS. The results from the SRTT experiment show that there was no net effect of stimulation on the performance of the participants. Results of a study questionnaire demonstrated that tNIRS did not induce serious side effects apart from light headache and fatigue. Nevertheless, 66% were able to detect the difference between active and sham stimulation conditions.In this study we provide further evidence that tNIRS is suitable as a tool for influencing cortical excitability and activity in the healthy human brain.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:29:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a32780a2411d4c15acc300d6d5ff9259
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:29:30Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-a32780a2411d4c15acc300d6d5ff92592022-12-22T03:44:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532015-06-01910.3389/fnbeh.2015.00147141722Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortexLeila eChaieb0Andrea eAntal1Florentin eMasurat2Walter ePaulus3University of BonnUniversity Medical Center GoettingenUniversity Medical Center GoettingenUniversity Medical Center GoettingenNear-infrared light stimulation of the brain has been claimed to improve deficits caused by traumatic brain injury and stroke. Here, we exploit the effect of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) as a tool to modulate cortical excitability in the healthy human brain. tNIRS was applied at a wavelength of 810 nm for 10 minutes over the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1). Both single-pulse and paired-pulse measures of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were used to assess levels of cortical excitability in the corticospinal pathway and intracortical circuits. The serial reaction time task (SRTT) was used to investigate the possible effect of tNIRS on implicit learning.By evaluating the mean amplitude of single-pulse TMS elicited motor-evoked-potentials (MEPs) a significant decrease of the amplitude was observed up to 30 minutes post-stimulation, compared to baseline. Furthermore, the short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) was increased and facilitation (ICF) decreased significantly after tNIRS. The results from the SRTT experiment show that there was no net effect of stimulation on the performance of the participants. Results of a study questionnaire demonstrated that tNIRS did not induce serious side effects apart from light headache and fatigue. Nevertheless, 66% were able to detect the difference between active and sham stimulation conditions.In this study we provide further evidence that tNIRS is suitable as a tool for influencing cortical excitability and activity in the healthy human brain.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00147/fullBrainLearninghumanneuroplasticitytranscranial near-infrared laser light stimulation
spellingShingle Leila eChaieb
Andrea eAntal
Florentin eMasurat
Walter ePaulus
Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Brain
Learning
human
neuroplasticity
transcranial near-infrared laser light stimulation
title Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex
title_full Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex
title_fullStr Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex
title_full_unstemmed Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex
title_short Neuroplastic effects of transcranial near-infrared stimulation (tNIRS) on the motor cortex
title_sort neuroplastic effects of transcranial near infrared stimulation tnirs on the motor cortex
topic Brain
Learning
human
neuroplasticity
transcranial near-infrared laser light stimulation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00147/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leilaechaieb neuroplasticeffectsoftranscranialnearinfraredstimulationtnirsonthemotorcortex
AT andreaeantal neuroplasticeffectsoftranscranialnearinfraredstimulationtnirsonthemotorcortex
AT florentinemasurat neuroplasticeffectsoftranscranialnearinfraredstimulationtnirsonthemotorcortex
AT walterepaulus neuroplasticeffectsoftranscranialnearinfraredstimulationtnirsonthemotorcortex