Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design
The inherent intermittency of wind and solar energy challenges the relevance of Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for their future design since LCOE neglects the time-varying price of electricity. The Cost of Valued Energy (COVE) is an improved valuation metric that takes into account time-dependent e...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Applied Energy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000300 |
| _version_ | 1798014356731985920 |
|---|---|
| author | Eric Loth Chris Qin Juliet G. Simpson Katherine Dykes |
| author_facet | Eric Loth Chris Qin Juliet G. Simpson Katherine Dykes |
| author_sort | Eric Loth |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The inherent intermittency of wind and solar energy challenges the relevance of Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for their future design since LCOE neglects the time-varying price of electricity. The Cost of Valued Energy (COVE) is an improved valuation metric that takes into account time-dependent electricity prices. In particular, it integrates short-term (e.g., hourly) wind and solar energy “generation devaluation”, whereby high wind and/or solar energy generation can lead to low, and even negative, energy prices for grids with high renewable penetration. These aspects are demonstrated and quantified with examples of two large grids with high renewable shares using three approaches to model hourly price: (1) residual demand, (2) wind and solar generation, and (3) statistical price-generation correlation. All three approaches indicate significant generation devaluation. The residual demand approach provides the most accurate price information while statistical correlations show that generation devaluation is most pronounced for the Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) that dominates market share (e.g., solar for California and wind for Germany). In some cases, the cost of valued energy relative to levelized cost can be 43% higher for solar (CAISO) and 129% higher for wind (ERCOT). This indicates that COVE is a much more relevant metric than LCOE in such markets. This is because COVE is based on the annualized system costs relative to the annualized spot market revenue, and thus considers economic effects of costs vs. revenue as well as those of supply vs. demand. As such, COVE (instead of LCOE) is recommended to design and value next-generation renewable energy systems, including storage integration tradeoffs. However, more work is needed to develop generation devaluation models for projected grids and markets and to better classify grid characteristics as we head to a carbon-neutral energy future. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:16:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a3344d9a31f54aadb37c2963829e70a2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-7924 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:16:07Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Applied Energy |
| spelling | doaj.art-a3344d9a31f54aadb37c2963829e70a22022-12-22T04:16:28ZengElsevierAdvances in Applied Energy2666-79242022-12-018100112Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy designEric Loth0Chris Qin1Juliet G. Simpson2Katherine Dykes3Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, 122 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; Corresponding author.Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Ave, Vancouver, WA 98686, USAMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, 122 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USAWind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, Roskilde 4000, DenmarkThe inherent intermittency of wind and solar energy challenges the relevance of Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for their future design since LCOE neglects the time-varying price of electricity. The Cost of Valued Energy (COVE) is an improved valuation metric that takes into account time-dependent electricity prices. In particular, it integrates short-term (e.g., hourly) wind and solar energy “generation devaluation”, whereby high wind and/or solar energy generation can lead to low, and even negative, energy prices for grids with high renewable penetration. These aspects are demonstrated and quantified with examples of two large grids with high renewable shares using three approaches to model hourly price: (1) residual demand, (2) wind and solar generation, and (3) statistical price-generation correlation. All three approaches indicate significant generation devaluation. The residual demand approach provides the most accurate price information while statistical correlations show that generation devaluation is most pronounced for the Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) that dominates market share (e.g., solar for California and wind for Germany). In some cases, the cost of valued energy relative to levelized cost can be 43% higher for solar (CAISO) and 129% higher for wind (ERCOT). This indicates that COVE is a much more relevant metric than LCOE in such markets. This is because COVE is based on the annualized system costs relative to the annualized spot market revenue, and thus considers economic effects of costs vs. revenue as well as those of supply vs. demand. As such, COVE (instead of LCOE) is recommended to design and value next-generation renewable energy systems, including storage integration tradeoffs. However, more work is needed to develop generation devaluation models for projected grids and markets and to better classify grid characteristics as we head to a carbon-neutral energy future.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000300LCOECOVECost of energyWindSolarRenewable energy |
| spellingShingle | Eric Loth Chris Qin Juliet G. Simpson Katherine Dykes Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design Advances in Applied Energy LCOE COVE Cost of energy Wind Solar Renewable energy |
| title | Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design |
| title_full | Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design |
| title_fullStr | Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design |
| title_short | Why we must move beyond LCOE for renewable energy design |
| title_sort | why we must move beyond lcoe for renewable energy design |
| topic | LCOE COVE Cost of energy Wind Solar Renewable energy |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000300 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ericloth whywemustmovebeyondlcoeforrenewableenergydesign AT chrisqin whywemustmovebeyondlcoeforrenewableenergydesign AT julietgsimpson whywemustmovebeyondlcoeforrenewableenergydesign AT katherinedykes whywemustmovebeyondlcoeforrenewableenergydesign |