Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria

Introduction: Administrative supervision of infection prevention and control (IPC) is the most important aspect of IPC/hazard controls. The practice, uptake, and compliance to IPC is a documented, cost-effective method of interrupting the infection transmission pathways. Poor or nonadherence to this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Casmir Ndubuisi Ochie, Elias C Aniwada, Chukwueloka K Uchegbu, Thaddeus C Asogwa, Chika N Onwasoigwe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijamhrjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2349-4220;year=2022;volume=9;issue=1;spage=30;epage=37;aulast=Ochie
_version_ 1811217717804400640
author Casmir Ndubuisi Ochie
Elias C Aniwada
Chukwueloka K Uchegbu
Thaddeus C Asogwa
Chika N Onwasoigwe
author_facet Casmir Ndubuisi Ochie
Elias C Aniwada
Chukwueloka K Uchegbu
Thaddeus C Asogwa
Chika N Onwasoigwe
author_sort Casmir Ndubuisi Ochie
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Administrative supervision of infection prevention and control (IPC) is the most important aspect of IPC/hazard controls. The practice, uptake, and compliance to IPC is a documented, cost-effective method of interrupting the infection transmission pathways. Poor or nonadherence to this has led to disabilities and loss of lives among health-care workers, especially in the face of emerging and re-emerging infections. The present study evaluated the practice of IPC as well as its uptake and administrative control among the primary health-care workers in Enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria. Methodology: This was an analytical cross-sectional study using semi-structured self-administered questionnaires and an observation checklist. Eligible health-care workers (HCWs) were selected using simple random sampling from ten primary health-care (PHC) facilities. Chi-square test was used to examine associations of interest. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of good IPC practices. Results: Three hundred eligible health-care workers participated in this study. More than a fifth (n = 65, 21.7%) of HCWs exhibited good practice of IPC measures. Correct practice of handwashing was noted among 275 (95.7%) respondents. Majority (n = 224, 74.7%) reported recapping of needles and engaged in unsanitary disposal of health-care wastes (n = 257, 85.7%). The prevalence of needlestick injuries 3 months prior to the study period was 53.3% (n = 160). Majority of those sampled reported a lack of IPC committee (n = 220, 73.3%), conspicuous signage to aid movement (n = 230, 76.7%), and an IPC policy (n = 217, 72.3%) in their respective centers. Identified predictors of good practice of IPC were age <40 years (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.57), being a community health extension worker or community health officer (AOR 3.76; 95% CI 1.56–9.03), and working for <20 years (AOR 5.10;95% CI 5.00-5.73). Conclusion: Poor practice of IPC and poor compliance to administrative control among PHC workers, in addition to lack of administrative facilities, remains a great challenge. There is an urgent need for capacity building on IPC and administrative support to reverse this trend.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:00:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a33d4c5bfa724d5dae529e5b3072db1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2349-4220
2350-0298
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:00:37Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
spelling doaj.art-a33d4c5bfa724d5dae529e5b3072db1d2022-12-22T03:43:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research2349-42202350-02982022-01-0191303710.4103/ijamr.ijamr_168_21Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast NigeriaCasmir Ndubuisi OchieElias C AniwadaChukwueloka K UchegbuThaddeus C AsogwaChika N OnwasoigweIntroduction: Administrative supervision of infection prevention and control (IPC) is the most important aspect of IPC/hazard controls. The practice, uptake, and compliance to IPC is a documented, cost-effective method of interrupting the infection transmission pathways. Poor or nonadherence to this has led to disabilities and loss of lives among health-care workers, especially in the face of emerging and re-emerging infections. The present study evaluated the practice of IPC as well as its uptake and administrative control among the primary health-care workers in Enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria. Methodology: This was an analytical cross-sectional study using semi-structured self-administered questionnaires and an observation checklist. Eligible health-care workers (HCWs) were selected using simple random sampling from ten primary health-care (PHC) facilities. Chi-square test was used to examine associations of interest. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of good IPC practices. Results: Three hundred eligible health-care workers participated in this study. More than a fifth (n = 65, 21.7%) of HCWs exhibited good practice of IPC measures. Correct practice of handwashing was noted among 275 (95.7%) respondents. Majority (n = 224, 74.7%) reported recapping of needles and engaged in unsanitary disposal of health-care wastes (n = 257, 85.7%). The prevalence of needlestick injuries 3 months prior to the study period was 53.3% (n = 160). Majority of those sampled reported a lack of IPC committee (n = 220, 73.3%), conspicuous signage to aid movement (n = 230, 76.7%), and an IPC policy (n = 217, 72.3%) in their respective centers. Identified predictors of good practice of IPC were age <40 years (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.57), being a community health extension worker or community health officer (AOR 3.76; 95% CI 1.56–9.03), and working for <20 years (AOR 5.10;95% CI 5.00-5.73). Conclusion: Poor practice of IPC and poor compliance to administrative control among PHC workers, in addition to lack of administrative facilities, remains a great challenge. There is an urgent need for capacity building on IPC and administrative support to reverse this trend.http://www.ijamhrjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2349-4220;year=2022;volume=9;issue=1;spage=30;epage=37;aulast=Ochieadministrative controlcomplianceinfection prevention and controlpracticeprimary health-care workers
spellingShingle Casmir Ndubuisi Ochie
Elias C Aniwada
Chukwueloka K Uchegbu
Thaddeus C Asogwa
Chika N Onwasoigwe
Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria
International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research
administrative control
compliance
infection prevention and control
practice
primary health-care workers
title Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria
title_full Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria
title_fullStr Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria
title_short Infection prevention and control: Practice, uptake, and administrative control among primary health-care workers in enugu metropolis, Southeast Nigeria
title_sort infection prevention and control practice uptake and administrative control among primary health care workers in enugu metropolis southeast nigeria
topic administrative control
compliance
infection prevention and control
practice
primary health-care workers
url http://www.ijamhrjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2349-4220;year=2022;volume=9;issue=1;spage=30;epage=37;aulast=Ochie
work_keys_str_mv AT casmirndubuisiochie infectionpreventionandcontrolpracticeuptakeandadministrativecontrolamongprimaryhealthcareworkersinenugumetropolissoutheastnigeria
AT eliascaniwada infectionpreventionandcontrolpracticeuptakeandadministrativecontrolamongprimaryhealthcareworkersinenugumetropolissoutheastnigeria
AT chukwuelokakuchegbu infectionpreventionandcontrolpracticeuptakeandadministrativecontrolamongprimaryhealthcareworkersinenugumetropolissoutheastnigeria
AT thaddeuscasogwa infectionpreventionandcontrolpracticeuptakeandadministrativecontrolamongprimaryhealthcareworkersinenugumetropolissoutheastnigeria
AT chikanonwasoigwe infectionpreventionandcontrolpracticeuptakeandadministrativecontrolamongprimaryhealthcareworkersinenugumetropolissoutheastnigeria