Highly prevalent emmSTG840.0 and emmSTC839.0 types of erythromycin non-susceptible group G Streptococcus isolated from bacteremia in southern Taiwan

Background/Purpose: Group G Streptococcus (GGS) infections in human have increased. Treatment relied on antibiotic therapy, including erythromycin. However, information regarding the dominant strains and erythromycin susceptibility in GGS bacteremia is limited. Methods: A total of 134 GGS were isola...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Po-Xing Zheng, Yuen-Chi Chan, Chien-Shun Chiou, Cheng-Lu Hsieh, Chuan Chiang-Ni, Jiunn-Jong Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-12-01
Series:Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118217300956
Description
Summary:Background/Purpose: Group G Streptococcus (GGS) infections in human have increased. Treatment relied on antibiotic therapy, including erythromycin. However, information regarding the dominant strains and erythromycin susceptibility in GGS bacteremia is limited. Methods: A total of 134 GGS were isolated from patients with bacteremia in a university hospital of southern Taiwan during 1993â2010. The erythromycin susceptibility was determined by disc diffusion and agar dilution assays. The bacterial species was determined by MALDI-TOF. The presence of erythromycin-resistant genes and emm types were determined by polymerase chain reaction and sequence. The clonal spreading was analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with SmaI or SgrAI digestion. Results: The annual erythromycin non-susceptible rate varied, with an average of 40.3%. All erythromycin non-susceptible strains belonged to the Streptococcus dysgalactiae. No erythromycin non-susceptible strains belong to the anginosus group. The most prevalent erythromycin-resistant gene was mefA (57.4%), followed by ermB (37%), and ermA (3.7%). The N terminal hyper variable region of emm was sequenced to determine the emm type, and only S. dysgalactiae had the emm gene. The most prevalent emm types were emmSTG840.0 (17.2%), emmSTG485.0 (10.4%), and emmSTC839.0 (9.0%). 73% and 47% of the strains with only mefA and ermB belonged to emmSTG840.0 and emmSTC839.0 types, respectively. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed that different clones of emmSTG840.0 and emmSTC839.0 strains were spread in this region during the 18 years of surveillance. Conclusion: Our data indicate that there were dominant emm types with erythromycin non-susceptibility in S. dysgalactiae isolated from bacteremia in Taiwan, and thus constant surveillance is warranted. Keywords: emm, Epidemiology, Erythromycin, Group G Streptococcus
ISSN:1684-1182