Psychological induction of the child: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral diagnostic markers
Introduction One of the tasks of the forensic assessment of family disputes is to establish the fact that a child is set up by one parent against another. Objectives Identification of diagnostic markers of psychological induced state in a child due to purposeful actions of a parent living togeth...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2021-04-01
|
Series: | European Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933821018976/type/journal_article |
Summary: | Introduction
One of the tasks of the forensic assessment of family disputes is to establish the fact that a child is set up by one parent against another.
Objectives
Identification of diagnostic markers of psychological induced state in a child due to purposeful actions of a parent living together with him.
Methods
A continuous one-step analysis of the results of forensic assessments on family disputes was carried out in respect of 48 girls and 67 boys aged 3 to 15 years (mean age 7.9 ± 4.5 years). The objective materials presented by the court were analyzed in comparison with the results of a structured interview. The statistical significance of any differences were evaluated using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney (U).
Results
Persistent negative attitude to one of the parents was found in 14% of children. Markers of the induced state at the cognitive level were identified: negative semantic attitudes (U=477.1; p=0.014), distorted image of the rejected parent (U=509.5; p=0.023), transformation of memories (U=389.5; p=0.001). At the emotional level: persistent negative attitude to one of the parents when idealizing the second (U=371.1; p=0.001), emotional involvement of the child in the family conflict (U=556.6; p=0.048). At the behavioral level: declaring a stable set of stereotypical “adult” phrases (U=387.3; p=0.001), regressive behaviors and manifestations of stress in the presence of a rejected parent (U=601.5; p=0.04). Markers on all three levels must co-exist.
Conclusions
There are diagnostic markers of the induced state in a child, which verify the forensic conclusion about the negative impact on his mental state of the parent-inducer.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0924-9338 1778-3585 |