Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions

Abstract Introduction: Racial disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) can be addressed through increased adherence to screening guidelines. In real-life encounters, patients may be more willing to follow screening recommendations delivered by a race concordant clinician. The growth of telehealth to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric J. Cooks, Kyle A. Duke, Jordan M. Neil, Melissa J. Vilaro, Danyell Wilson-Howard, Francois Modave, Thomas J. George, Folakemi T. Odedina, Benjamin C. Lok, Peter Carek, Eric B. Laber, Marie Davidian, Janice L. Krieger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122003867/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156597171290112
author Eric J. Cooks
Kyle A. Duke
Jordan M. Neil
Melissa J. Vilaro
Danyell Wilson-Howard
Francois Modave
Thomas J. George
Folakemi T. Odedina
Benjamin C. Lok
Peter Carek
Eric B. Laber
Marie Davidian
Janice L. Krieger
author_facet Eric J. Cooks
Kyle A. Duke
Jordan M. Neil
Melissa J. Vilaro
Danyell Wilson-Howard
Francois Modave
Thomas J. George
Folakemi T. Odedina
Benjamin C. Lok
Peter Carek
Eric B. Laber
Marie Davidian
Janice L. Krieger
author_sort Eric J. Cooks
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction: Racial disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) can be addressed through increased adherence to screening guidelines. In real-life encounters, patients may be more willing to follow screening recommendations delivered by a race concordant clinician. The growth of telehealth to deliver care provides an opportunity to explore whether these effects translate to a virtual setting. The primary purpose of this pilot study is to explore the relationships between virtual clinician (VC) characteristics and CRC screening intentions after engagement with a telehealth intervention leveraging technology to deliver tailored CRC prevention messaging. Methods: Using a posttest-only design with three factors (VC race-matching, VC gender, intervention type), participants (N = 2267) were randomised to one of eight intervention treatments. Participants self-reported perceptions and behavioral intentions. Results: The benefits of matching participants with a racially similar VC trended positive but did not reach statistical significance. Specifically, race-matching positively influenced screening intentions for Black participants but not for Whites (b = 0.29, p = 0.10). Importantly, perceptions of credibility, attractiveness, and message relevance significantly influenced screening intentions and the relationship with race-matching. Conclusions: To reduce racial CRC screening disparities, investments are needed to identify patient-focused interventions to address structural barriers to screening. This study suggests that telehealth interventions that match Black patients with a Black VC can enhance perceptions of credibility and message relevance, which may then improve screening intentions. Future research is needed to examine how to increase VC credibility and attractiveness, as well as message relevance without race-matching.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:54:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a34bc92adab842e6b6993c015565b512
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:54:00Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-a34bc92adab842e6b6993c015565b5122023-03-09T12:31:03ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612022-01-01610.1017/cts.2022.386Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentionsEric J. Cooks0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-1237Kyle A. Duke1Jordan M. Neil2Melissa J. Vilaro3Danyell Wilson-Howard4Francois Modave5Thomas J. George6Folakemi T. Odedina7Benjamin C. Lok8Peter Carek9Eric B. Laber10Marie Davidian11Janice L. Krieger12STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USAMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USASTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADepartment of Chemistry, Bethune-Cookman University, Daytona Beach, FL, USADepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADivision of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADepartment of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USADepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USADepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USASTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Abstract Introduction: Racial disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) can be addressed through increased adherence to screening guidelines. In real-life encounters, patients may be more willing to follow screening recommendations delivered by a race concordant clinician. The growth of telehealth to deliver care provides an opportunity to explore whether these effects translate to a virtual setting. The primary purpose of this pilot study is to explore the relationships between virtual clinician (VC) characteristics and CRC screening intentions after engagement with a telehealth intervention leveraging technology to deliver tailored CRC prevention messaging. Methods: Using a posttest-only design with three factors (VC race-matching, VC gender, intervention type), participants (N = 2267) were randomised to one of eight intervention treatments. Participants self-reported perceptions and behavioral intentions. Results: The benefits of matching participants with a racially similar VC trended positive but did not reach statistical significance. Specifically, race-matching positively influenced screening intentions for Black participants but not for Whites (b = 0.29, p = 0.10). Importantly, perceptions of credibility, attractiveness, and message relevance significantly influenced screening intentions and the relationship with race-matching. Conclusions: To reduce racial CRC screening disparities, investments are needed to identify patient-focused interventions to address structural barriers to screening. This study suggests that telehealth interventions that match Black patients with a Black VC can enhance perceptions of credibility and message relevance, which may then improve screening intentions. Future research is needed to examine how to increase VC credibility and attractiveness, as well as message relevance without race-matching. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122003867/type/journal_articleCancer health disparitiescolorectal cancer screeningtelehealthvirtual human technologyprecision prevention
spellingShingle Eric J. Cooks
Kyle A. Duke
Jordan M. Neil
Melissa J. Vilaro
Danyell Wilson-Howard
Francois Modave
Thomas J. George
Folakemi T. Odedina
Benjamin C. Lok
Peter Carek
Eric B. Laber
Marie Davidian
Janice L. Krieger
Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Cancer health disparities
colorectal cancer screening
telehealth
virtual human technology
precision prevention
title Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
title_full Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
title_fullStr Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
title_short Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
title_sort telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening a pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions
topic Cancer health disparities
colorectal cancer screening
telehealth
virtual human technology
precision prevention
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122003867/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT ericjcooks telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT kyleaduke telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT jordanmneil telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT melissajvilaro telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT danyellwilsonhoward telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT francoismodave telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT thomasjgeorge telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT folakemitodedina telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT benjaminclok telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT petercarek telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT ericblaber telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT mariedavidian telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions
AT janicelkrieger telehealthandracialdisparitiesincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudyofhowvirtualcliniciancharacteristicsinfluencescreeningintentions