Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park

The remote sensing implementation is beneficial as a means of monitoring the ecosystem. Landsat imagery is a remote sensing (open access) based data source with a long and wide monitoring period with good image quality. This study compares the accuracy of Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 satellite images in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: As-syakur Abd. Rahman, Aryunisha Putu Echa Priyaning, Wijana I. Made Sara, Novanda I. Gede Agus, Dewi I. Gusti Ayu Istri Pradnyandari, Andiani Anak Agung Eka, Premananda Made Goura, Sugiana I. Putu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/79/e3sconf_isffs2023_03001.pdf
_version_ 1797345572059873280
author As-syakur Abd. Rahman
Aryunisha Putu Echa Priyaning
Wijana I. Made Sara
Novanda I. Gede Agus
Dewi I. Gusti Ayu Istri Pradnyandari
Andiani Anak Agung Eka
Premananda Made Goura
Sugiana I. Putu
author_facet As-syakur Abd. Rahman
Aryunisha Putu Echa Priyaning
Wijana I. Made Sara
Novanda I. Gede Agus
Dewi I. Gusti Ayu Istri Pradnyandari
Andiani Anak Agung Eka
Premananda Made Goura
Sugiana I. Putu
author_sort As-syakur Abd. Rahman
collection DOAJ
description The remote sensing implementation is beneficial as a means of monitoring the ecosystem. Landsat imagery is a remote sensing (open access) based data source with a long and wide monitoring period with good image quality. This study compares the accuracy of Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 satellite images in detecting mangrove canopy cover using 13 different remote sensing vegetation indices in the West Bali National Park, Indonesia. The mangrove canopy cover data was collected with the hemispherical photography method. A linear regression test was conducted to determine the relationship between the remote sensing vegetation indices and the field's percentage of mangrove canopy cover. The result indicated that Landsat 8 was more accurate in detecting mangrove canopy cover than Landsat 9. Of the 13 remote sensing indices evaluated, the Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (CVI) had the highest accuracy, with R2 values of 0.86 and 0.75 for Landsat 8 and 9, respectively.*
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:20:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3537533d83e44baa7f3f66a06eec6c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:20:39Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-a3537533d83e44baa7f3f66a06eec6c82024-01-26T10:02:20ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422023-01-014420300110.1051/e3sconf/202344203001e3sconf_isffs2023_03001Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National ParkAs-syakur Abd. Rahman0Aryunisha Putu Echa Priyaning1Wijana I. Made Sara2Novanda I. Gede Agus3Dewi I. Gusti Ayu Istri Pradnyandari4Andiani Anak Agung Eka5Premananda Made Goura6Sugiana I. Putu7Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries Udayana UniversityFaculty of Marine Science and Fisheries Udayana UniversityFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Udayana UniversityEnvironment Research Centre Udayana UniversityEnvironment Research Centre Udayana UniversityEnvironment Research Centre Udayana UniversityEnvironment Research Centre Udayana UniversityBogor Agricultural UniversityThe remote sensing implementation is beneficial as a means of monitoring the ecosystem. Landsat imagery is a remote sensing (open access) based data source with a long and wide monitoring period with good image quality. This study compares the accuracy of Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 satellite images in detecting mangrove canopy cover using 13 different remote sensing vegetation indices in the West Bali National Park, Indonesia. The mangrove canopy cover data was collected with the hemispherical photography method. A linear regression test was conducted to determine the relationship between the remote sensing vegetation indices and the field's percentage of mangrove canopy cover. The result indicated that Landsat 8 was more accurate in detecting mangrove canopy cover than Landsat 9. Of the 13 remote sensing indices evaluated, the Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (CVI) had the highest accuracy, with R2 values of 0.86 and 0.75 for Landsat 8 and 9, respectively.*https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/79/e3sconf_isffs2023_03001.pdf
spellingShingle As-syakur Abd. Rahman
Aryunisha Putu Echa Priyaning
Wijana I. Made Sara
Novanda I. Gede Agus
Dewi I. Gusti Ayu Istri Pradnyandari
Andiani Anak Agung Eka
Premananda Made Goura
Sugiana I. Putu
Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park
E3S Web of Conferences
title Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park
title_full Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park
title_fullStr Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park
title_short Comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in West Bali National Park
title_sort comparison of mangrove canopy covering accuracy using landsat 8 and landsat 9 imagery based on several vegetation indices in west bali national park
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/79/e3sconf_isffs2023_03001.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT assyakurabdrahman comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT aryunishaputuechapriyaning comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT wijanaimadesara comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT novandaigedeagus comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT dewiigustiayuistripradnyandari comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT andianianakagungeka comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT premanandamadegoura comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark
AT sugianaiputu comparisonofmangrovecanopycoveringaccuracyusinglandsat8andlandsat9imagerybasedonseveralvegetationindicesinwestbalinationalpark