Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation

Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients who received a second line of therapy post ASCT for their light chain amyloidosis. Most patients (40%) were treated with an alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex followed by an alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex (26%), an alkylator ± ste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah S. Al Saleh, Mohammad S. Ebraheem, M. Hasib Sidiqi, Angela Dispenzieri, Eli Muchtar, Francis K. Buadi, Rahma Warsame, Martha Q. Lacy, David Dingli, Wilson I. Gonsalves, Taxiarchis V. Kourelis, William J. Hogan, Suzanne R. Hayman, Prashant Kapoor, Shaji K. Kumar, Morie A. Gertz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2022-04-01
Series:Blood Cancer Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00655-z
_version_ 1818273420044926976
author Abdullah S. Al Saleh
Mohammad S. Ebraheem
M. Hasib Sidiqi
Angela Dispenzieri
Eli Muchtar
Francis K. Buadi
Rahma Warsame
Martha Q. Lacy
David Dingli
Wilson I. Gonsalves
Taxiarchis V. Kourelis
William J. Hogan
Suzanne R. Hayman
Prashant Kapoor
Shaji K. Kumar
Morie A. Gertz
author_facet Abdullah S. Al Saleh
Mohammad S. Ebraheem
M. Hasib Sidiqi
Angela Dispenzieri
Eli Muchtar
Francis K. Buadi
Rahma Warsame
Martha Q. Lacy
David Dingli
Wilson I. Gonsalves
Taxiarchis V. Kourelis
William J. Hogan
Suzanne R. Hayman
Prashant Kapoor
Shaji K. Kumar
Morie A. Gertz
author_sort Abdullah S. Al Saleh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients who received a second line of therapy post ASCT for their light chain amyloidosis. Most patients (40%) were treated with an alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex followed by an alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex (26%), an alkylator ± steroid or steroid monotherapy (19%), a 2nd-gen IMiD + PI ± dex (6%), an alkylator + thalidomide ± dex (5%), or daratumumab-based therapy (4%). The rate of CR or VGPR was 70% among the daratumumab-based group, 62% in the alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex group, 55% in the alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex group, 47% in the 2nd-gen IMiD + PI ± dex group, 24% in the alkylator ± steroid or steroid monotherapy group, and 18% in the alkylator + thalidomide ± dex group. The median OS was NR for the 2nd-gen IMiD + PI ± dex group and the daratumumab group, 130.4 months in the alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex group, 100 months for the alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex group, 36 months for the alkylator ± steroid or steroid monotherapy group, and 21 months for the alkylator + thalidomide ± dex group (P < 0.0001). The median OS was 100 months in patients who received melphalan 200 mg/m2 compared to 41 months in the 140 mg/m2 group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, patients receiving novel therapy post ASCT and melphalan conditioning dosing at 200 mg/m2 at diagnosis had better outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:57:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a35e84cd0928430f9323a1c18bf23c69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2044-5385
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:57:40Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Blood Cancer Journal
spelling doaj.art-a35e84cd0928430f9323a1c18bf23c692022-12-22T00:10:35ZengNature Publishing GroupBlood Cancer Journal2044-53852022-04-011241610.1038/s41408-022-00655-zTreatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantationAbdullah S. Al Saleh0Mohammad S. Ebraheem1M. Hasib Sidiqi2Angela Dispenzieri3Eli Muchtar4Francis K. Buadi5Rahma Warsame6Martha Q. Lacy7David Dingli8Wilson I. Gonsalves9Taxiarchis V. Kourelis10William J. Hogan11Suzanne R. Hayman12Prashant Kapoor13Shaji K. Kumar14Morie A. Gertz15Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo ClinicAbstract We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients who received a second line of therapy post ASCT for their light chain amyloidosis. Most patients (40%) were treated with an alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex followed by an alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex (26%), an alkylator ± steroid or steroid monotherapy (19%), a 2nd-gen IMiD + PI ± dex (6%), an alkylator + thalidomide ± dex (5%), or daratumumab-based therapy (4%). The rate of CR or VGPR was 70% among the daratumumab-based group, 62% in the alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex group, 55% in the alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex group, 47% in the 2nd-gen IMiD + PI ± dex group, 24% in the alkylator ± steroid or steroid monotherapy group, and 18% in the alkylator + thalidomide ± dex group. The median OS was NR for the 2nd-gen IMiD + PI ± dex group and the daratumumab group, 130.4 months in the alkylator + 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex or 2nd-gen IMiD ± dex group, 100 months for the alkylator + PI ± dex or PI ± dex group, 36 months for the alkylator ± steroid or steroid monotherapy group, and 21 months for the alkylator + thalidomide ± dex group (P < 0.0001). The median OS was 100 months in patients who received melphalan 200 mg/m2 compared to 41 months in the 140 mg/m2 group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, patients receiving novel therapy post ASCT and melphalan conditioning dosing at 200 mg/m2 at diagnosis had better outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00655-z
spellingShingle Abdullah S. Al Saleh
Mohammad S. Ebraheem
M. Hasib Sidiqi
Angela Dispenzieri
Eli Muchtar
Francis K. Buadi
Rahma Warsame
Martha Q. Lacy
David Dingli
Wilson I. Gonsalves
Taxiarchis V. Kourelis
William J. Hogan
Suzanne R. Hayman
Prashant Kapoor
Shaji K. Kumar
Morie A. Gertz
Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
Blood Cancer Journal
title Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
title_full Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
title_fullStr Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
title_short Treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
title_sort treatment and outcomes of patients with light chain amyloidosis who received a second line of therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00655-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahsalsaleh treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT mohammadsebraheem treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT mhasibsidiqi treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT angeladispenzieri treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT elimuchtar treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT franciskbuadi treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT rahmawarsame treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT marthaqlacy treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT daviddingli treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT wilsonigonsalves treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT taxiarchisvkourelis treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT williamjhogan treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT suzannerhayman treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT prashantkapoor treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT shajikkumar treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation
AT morieagertz treatmentandoutcomesofpatientswithlightchainamyloidosiswhoreceivedasecondlineoftherapypostautologousstemcelltransplantation