Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study

Abstract Background Perinatal decision-making affects outcomes for extremely preterm babies (22–26 weeks’ gestational age (GA)): more active units have improved survival without increased morbidity. We hypothesised such units may gain skills and expertise meaning babies at higher gestational ages ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrei Scott Morgan, Babak Khoshnood, Caroline Diguisto, Laurence Foix L’Helias, Laetitia Marchand-Martin, Monique Kaminski, Jennifer Zeitlin, Gérard Bréart, François Goffinet, Pierre-Yves Ancel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-01-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1856-1
_version_ 1830187589153325056
author Andrei Scott Morgan
Babak Khoshnood
Caroline Diguisto
Laurence Foix L’Helias
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
Monique Kaminski
Jennifer Zeitlin
Gérard Bréart
François Goffinet
Pierre-Yves Ancel
author_facet Andrei Scott Morgan
Babak Khoshnood
Caroline Diguisto
Laurence Foix L’Helias
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
Monique Kaminski
Jennifer Zeitlin
Gérard Bréart
François Goffinet
Pierre-Yves Ancel
author_sort Andrei Scott Morgan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Perinatal decision-making affects outcomes for extremely preterm babies (22–26 weeks’ gestational age (GA)): more active units have improved survival without increased morbidity. We hypothesised such units may gain skills and expertise meaning babies at higher gestational ages have better outcomes than if they were born elsewhere. We examined mortality and morbidity outcomes at age two for babies born at 27–28 weeks’ GA in relation to the intensity of perinatal care provided to extremely preterm babies. Methods Fetuses from the 2011 French national prospective EPIPAGE-2 cohort, alive at maternal admission to a level 3 hospital and delivered at 27–28 weeks’ GA, were included. Morbidity-free survival (survival without sensorimotor (blindness, deafness or cerebral palsy) disability) and overall survival at age two were examined. Sensorimotor disability and Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) result below threshold among survivors were secondary outcomes. Perinatal care intensity level was based on birth hospital, grouped using the ratio of 24–25 weeks’ GA babies admitted to neonatal intensive care to fetuses of the same gestation alive at maternal admission. Sensitivity analyses used ratios based upon antenatal steroids, Caesarean section, and newborn resuscitation. Multiple imputation was used for missing data; hierarchical logistic regression accounted for births nested within centres. Results 633 of 747 fetuses (84.7%) born at 27–28 weeks’ GA survived to age two. There were no differences in survival or morbidity-free survival: respectively, fully adjusted odds ratios were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.54 to 1.71) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.59 to 2.01) in medium and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.63 to 2.00) and 1.16 (95% CI: 0.62 to 2.16) in high compared to low-intensity hospitals. Among survivors, there were no differences in sensorimotor disability or ASQ below threshold. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main results. Conclusions No difference was seen in survival or morbidity-free survival at two years of age among fetuses alive at maternal hospital admission born at 27–28 weeks’ GA, or in sensorimotor disability or presence of an ASQ below threshold among survivors. There is no evidence for an impact of intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies on births at a higher gestational age.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T22:29:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a36498e48b83461bbe00ca3ea758ba96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T22:29:44Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-a36498e48b83461bbe00ca3ea758ba962022-12-21T21:30:13ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312020-01-0120111010.1186/s12887-019-1856-1Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort studyAndrei Scott Morgan0Babak Khoshnood1Caroline Diguisto2Laurence Foix L’Helias3Laetitia Marchand-Martin4Monique Kaminski5Jennifer Zeitlin6Gérard Bréart7François Goffinet8Pierre-Yves Ancel9Université de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAUniversité de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center/CRESS, INSERM (U1153 – Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé)), INRAAbstract Background Perinatal decision-making affects outcomes for extremely preterm babies (22–26 weeks’ gestational age (GA)): more active units have improved survival without increased morbidity. We hypothesised such units may gain skills and expertise meaning babies at higher gestational ages have better outcomes than if they were born elsewhere. We examined mortality and morbidity outcomes at age two for babies born at 27–28 weeks’ GA in relation to the intensity of perinatal care provided to extremely preterm babies. Methods Fetuses from the 2011 French national prospective EPIPAGE-2 cohort, alive at maternal admission to a level 3 hospital and delivered at 27–28 weeks’ GA, were included. Morbidity-free survival (survival without sensorimotor (blindness, deafness or cerebral palsy) disability) and overall survival at age two were examined. Sensorimotor disability and Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) result below threshold among survivors were secondary outcomes. Perinatal care intensity level was based on birth hospital, grouped using the ratio of 24–25 weeks’ GA babies admitted to neonatal intensive care to fetuses of the same gestation alive at maternal admission. Sensitivity analyses used ratios based upon antenatal steroids, Caesarean section, and newborn resuscitation. Multiple imputation was used for missing data; hierarchical logistic regression accounted for births nested within centres. Results 633 of 747 fetuses (84.7%) born at 27–28 weeks’ GA survived to age two. There were no differences in survival or morbidity-free survival: respectively, fully adjusted odds ratios were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.54 to 1.71) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.59 to 2.01) in medium and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.63 to 2.00) and 1.16 (95% CI: 0.62 to 2.16) in high compared to low-intensity hospitals. Among survivors, there were no differences in sensorimotor disability or ASQ below threshold. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main results. Conclusions No difference was seen in survival or morbidity-free survival at two years of age among fetuses alive at maternal hospital admission born at 27–28 weeks’ GA, or in sensorimotor disability or presence of an ASQ below threshold among survivors. There is no evidence for an impact of intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies on births at a higher gestational age.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1856-1Extreme prematurityNewbornPerinatal intensityActivityObstetricNeonatal
spellingShingle Andrei Scott Morgan
Babak Khoshnood
Caroline Diguisto
Laurence Foix L’Helias
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
Monique Kaminski
Jennifer Zeitlin
Gérard Bréart
François Goffinet
Pierre-Yves Ancel
Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
BMC Pediatrics
Extreme prematurity
Newborn
Perinatal intensity
Activity
Obstetric
Neonatal
title Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_full Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_fullStr Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_short Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_sort intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age evidence from the epipage 2 cohort study
topic Extreme prematurity
Newborn
Perinatal intensity
Activity
Obstetric
Neonatal
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1856-1
work_keys_str_mv AT andreiscottmorgan intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT babakkhoshnood intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT carolinediguisto intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT laurencefoixlhelias intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT laetitiamarchandmartin intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT moniquekaminski intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT jenniferzeitlin intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT gerardbreart intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT francoisgoffinet intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT pierreyvesancel intensityofperinatalcareforextremelypretermbabiesandoutcomesatahighergestationalageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy