Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program

In this study, three dimensions were evaluated: the process of developing the curriculum, course distribution to serve quality assurance, and development of courses for Merdeka Belajar (Freedom to Learn) program. Curriculum documents and papers presented in the focus group discussion were used as da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Imroatus Solikhah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Social Studies Education Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/4251
_version_ 1797915814607716352
author Imroatus Solikhah
author_facet Imroatus Solikhah
author_sort Imroatus Solikhah
collection DOAJ
description In this study, three dimensions were evaluated: the process of developing the curriculum, course distribution to serve quality assurance, and development of courses for Merdeka Belajar (Freedom to Learn) program. Curriculum documents and papers presented in the focus group discussion were used as data sources. Content analysis design and qualitative data analysis were used for analyzing the data.  A total of 42 participants from Indonesian public and Islamic universities were included in this study. The data were thematically analyzed. The study resulted in three key findings. First, initial curriculum development focused on competency-based curriculum and outcome-based education. Not all learning outcomes and course mapping match the curriculum based on backward design. Second, the National Qualification Framework should be built on the skill and knowledge cluster to adequately assess course learning outcomes. Also, the 144-credit-course distribution should allow the undergraduate program to be completed in seven semesters. Third, curriculum developers can divide 40 semester credits for Merdeka Belajar courses and 104 credits for regular courses. Conversion of credits can be achieved by assigning equal courses in the same semester, combining undergraduate research with fieldwork, or publication in a journal.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:47:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a36d65b977124618ba3979926a95614c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1309-9108
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:47:38Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Journal of Social Studies Education Research
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Studies Education Research
spelling doaj.art-a36d65b977124618ba3979926a95614c2023-02-15T16:13:58ZengJournal of Social Studies Education ResearchJournal of Social Studies Education Research1309-91082022-06-01132243264569Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn programImroatus Solikhah0State Islamic Institute (IAIN) SurakartaIn this study, three dimensions were evaluated: the process of developing the curriculum, course distribution to serve quality assurance, and development of courses for Merdeka Belajar (Freedom to Learn) program. Curriculum documents and papers presented in the focus group discussion were used as data sources. Content analysis design and qualitative data analysis were used for analyzing the data.  A total of 42 participants from Indonesian public and Islamic universities were included in this study. The data were thematically analyzed. The study resulted in three key findings. First, initial curriculum development focused on competency-based curriculum and outcome-based education. Not all learning outcomes and course mapping match the curriculum based on backward design. Second, the National Qualification Framework should be built on the skill and knowledge cluster to adequately assess course learning outcomes. Also, the 144-credit-course distribution should allow the undergraduate program to be completed in seven semesters. Third, curriculum developers can divide 40 semester credits for Merdeka Belajar courses and 104 credits for regular courses. Conversion of credits can be achieved by assigning equal courses in the same semester, combining undergraduate research with fieldwork, or publication in a journal.https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/4251learning outcomes, outcome-based education, competence-based curriculum, freedom to learn, backward design approach.
spellingShingle Imroatus Solikhah
Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program
Journal of Social Studies Education Research
learning outcomes, outcome-based education, competence-based curriculum, freedom to learn, backward design approach.
title Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program
title_full Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program
title_fullStr Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program
title_short Revisiting the EFL curriculum in the outcome-based education framework and freedom to learn program
title_sort revisiting the efl curriculum in the outcome based education framework and freedom to learn program
topic learning outcomes, outcome-based education, competence-based curriculum, freedom to learn, backward design approach.
url https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/4251
work_keys_str_mv AT imroatussolikhah revisitingtheeflcurriculumintheoutcomebasededucationframeworkandfreedomtolearnprogram