Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)

One of the aspects of international law for peaceful settlement of legal disputes is the consent of parties to the jurisdiction of international court of justice (ICJ). In this regard, the way this consent will be presented, is not important. By taking into account of this rule and jurisprudence of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad Reza Hoseini
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2012-01-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_2342_cb028be251efec65592a90347affd26c.pdf
_version_ 1797359431136051200
author Mohammad Reza Hoseini
author_facet Mohammad Reza Hoseini
author_sort Mohammad Reza Hoseini
collection DOAJ
description One of the aspects of international law for peaceful settlement of legal disputes is the consent of parties to the jurisdiction of international court of justice (ICJ). In this regard, the way this consent will be presented, is not important. By taking into account of this rule and jurisprudence of ICJ and short comings of statute of the court, there must be some other jurisdictions which are beyond those ones anticipated in the statute of the international court of justice (ICJ). For these reasons,there is another kind of jurisdiction which is called "Forum Prorogatum",in rules of the court. According to this kind of jurisdiction, the respondent can informimpliedly or expressly the court about its consent.Even after,filing an application by defendant in the registry of the court. It can be done impliedly by taking an action or participation in hearing without any objections or explicitly by sending a letter in this regard to the court. This kind of jurisdiction at first applied by [PCIJ] in the case of Mavrommatis Palestine concessions (Greece/ United Kingdom) and gradually finds its place in jurisprudence of the court. In a way that nowadays becomes a usual way of filling an application in registry of the court for exercising its jurisdiction. we will consider the latest judgment of court in case concerning "Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal matters" (Djibouti /France) 4 June 2008 in this essay and discuss its challenges.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:18:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a371f3b7da6e4378b9c679abfa427aff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-6116
2476-6216
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:18:32Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī
spelling doaj.art-a371f3b7da6e4378b9c679abfa427aff2024-01-10T10:49:14ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī2345-61162476-62162012-01-0114381932192342Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)Mohammad Reza Hoseini0دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بین الملل دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات تهرانOne of the aspects of international law for peaceful settlement of legal disputes is the consent of parties to the jurisdiction of international court of justice (ICJ). In this regard, the way this consent will be presented, is not important. By taking into account of this rule and jurisprudence of ICJ and short comings of statute of the court, there must be some other jurisdictions which are beyond those ones anticipated in the statute of the international court of justice (ICJ). For these reasons,there is another kind of jurisdiction which is called "Forum Prorogatum",in rules of the court. According to this kind of jurisdiction, the respondent can informimpliedly or expressly the court about its consent.Even after,filing an application by defendant in the registry of the court. It can be done impliedly by taking an action or participation in hearing without any objections or explicitly by sending a letter in this regard to the court. This kind of jurisdiction at first applied by [PCIJ] in the case of Mavrommatis Palestine concessions (Greece/ United Kingdom) and gradually finds its place in jurisprudence of the court. In a way that nowadays becomes a usual way of filling an application in registry of the court for exercising its jurisdiction. we will consider the latest judgment of court in case concerning "Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal matters" (Djibouti /France) 4 June 2008 in this essay and discuss its challenges.https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_2342_cb028be251efec65592a90347affd26c.pdfconsentjurisdictioninternational court of justicepermanent court of international justiceforum prorogatumjurisprudencesovereigntyinternational courts
spellingShingle Mohammad Reza Hoseini
Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī
consent
jurisdiction
international court of justice
permanent court of international justice
forum prorogatum
jurisprudence
sovereignty
international courts
title Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)
title_full Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)
title_fullStr Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)
title_full_unstemmed Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)
title_short Forum Prorogatum before the International Court of Justice: The Djibouti v. France Case (2008)
title_sort forum prorogatum before the international court of justice the djibouti v france case 2008
topic consent
jurisdiction
international court of justice
permanent court of international justice
forum prorogatum
jurisprudence
sovereignty
international courts
url https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_2342_cb028be251efec65592a90347affd26c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezahoseini forumprorogatumbeforetheinternationalcourtofjusticethedjiboutivfrancecase2008