The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy

The aim of this contribution is to critically introduce and assess the Frankfurt School’s theory of late capitalism as it emerged in the 1970s, when a combined crisis of inflation and stagnation began to unravel the Keynesian orthodoxies of state-organised capitalism. In the process, Frankfurt theor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bob Roth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-06-01
Series:European Law Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613523000395/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797643821847150592
author Bob Roth
author_facet Bob Roth
author_sort Bob Roth
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this contribution is to critically introduce and assess the Frankfurt School’s theory of late capitalism as it emerged in the 1970s, when a combined crisis of inflation and stagnation began to unravel the Keynesian orthodoxies of state-organised capitalism. In the process, Frankfurt theorists such as Jürgen Habermas and Claus Offe developed powerful critiques of commodification and juridification. The origins of their theory of late capitalism are first traced to the interwar debates on the Weimar Constitution – Germany’s first experiment in both constitutional and economic democracy. The rest of the Article takes a closer look at the Frankfurt School’s changing posture towards economic democracy in the 1970s. Accordingly, I first reiterate how the theory of late capitalism converged with that of the other major crisis theory of the time – the neo-conservative theory of ‘ungovernability’. In diagnosing the ‘governability crisis’ as a crisis of democracy, the Frankfurt School’s increasing pessimism about democracy’s economic reach becomes apparent. Secondly, by looking at the way the Frankfurt School perceived the emergence of the ‘neoliberal’ alternative in the early 1980s, I also argue that the theory of late capitalism had, and did, little to resist the de-democratisation of the economy through the rise of economic constitutionalism in the 1980s. As the welfare state was caught between the two logics of commodification and juridification, economic democracy was its unwitting victim.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:21:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3876a3f60814b9f8d88f7959a8adc08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2752-6135
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:21:33Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series European Law Open
spelling doaj.art-a3876a3f60814b9f8d88f7959a8adc082023-10-31T16:13:22ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Law Open2752-61352023-06-01238640410.1017/elo.2023.39The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracyBob Roth0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5283-0629Law School, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UKThe aim of this contribution is to critically introduce and assess the Frankfurt School’s theory of late capitalism as it emerged in the 1970s, when a combined crisis of inflation and stagnation began to unravel the Keynesian orthodoxies of state-organised capitalism. In the process, Frankfurt theorists such as Jürgen Habermas and Claus Offe developed powerful critiques of commodification and juridification. The origins of their theory of late capitalism are first traced to the interwar debates on the Weimar Constitution – Germany’s first experiment in both constitutional and economic democracy. The rest of the Article takes a closer look at the Frankfurt School’s changing posture towards economic democracy in the 1970s. Accordingly, I first reiterate how the theory of late capitalism converged with that of the other major crisis theory of the time – the neo-conservative theory of ‘ungovernability’. In diagnosing the ‘governability crisis’ as a crisis of democracy, the Frankfurt School’s increasing pessimism about democracy’s economic reach becomes apparent. Secondly, by looking at the way the Frankfurt School perceived the emergence of the ‘neoliberal’ alternative in the early 1980s, I also argue that the theory of late capitalism had, and did, little to resist the de-democratisation of the economy through the rise of economic constitutionalism in the 1980s. As the welfare state was caught between the two logics of commodification and juridification, economic democracy was its unwitting victim.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613523000395/type/journal_articlejuridificationcommodificationFrankfurt SchoolJürgen Habermasrule of law
spellingShingle Bob Roth
The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy
European Law Open
juridification
commodification
Frankfurt School
Jürgen Habermas
rule of law
title The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy
title_full The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy
title_fullStr The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy
title_full_unstemmed The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy
title_short The welfare state between juridification and commodification: how the Frankfurt School gave up on economic democracy
title_sort welfare state between juridification and commodification how the frankfurt school gave up on economic democracy
topic juridification
commodification
Frankfurt School
Jürgen Habermas
rule of law
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613523000395/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT bobroth thewelfarestatebetweenjuridificationandcommodificationhowthefrankfurtschoolgaveuponeconomicdemocracy
AT bobroth welfarestatebetweenjuridificationandcommodificationhowthefrankfurtschoolgaveuponeconomicdemocracy