A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges

This article compares the performance of four different interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) techniques for the estimation of rice crop height by means of bistatic TanDEM-X data. Methods based on the interferometric phase alone, on the coherence amplitude alone, on the complex coherence va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noelia Romero-Puig, Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2021-01-01
Series:IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9502559/
_version_ 1818577212978233344
author Noelia Romero-Puig
Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez
author_facet Noelia Romero-Puig
Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez
author_sort Noelia Romero-Puig
collection DOAJ
description This article compares the performance of four different interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) techniques for the estimation of rice crop height by means of bistatic TanDEM-X data. Methods based on the interferometric phase alone, on the coherence amplitude alone, on the complex coherence value, and on polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR) are analyzed. Validation is conducted with reference data acquired over rice fields in Spain during the Science Phase of the TanDEM-X mission. Single- and dual-polarized data are exploited to also provide further insights into the polarization influence on these approaches. Vegetation height estimates from methodologies based on the interferometric phase show a general underestimation for the HH channel (with a bias that reaches around 25 cm in mid-July for some fields), whereas the VV channel is strongly influenced by noisy phases, especially at large incidences [root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 31 cm]. Results show that these approaches perform better at shallower incidences than the methodologies based on coherence amplitude and on PolInSAR, which obtain the most suitable results at steep incidences, with RMSE values of 17 and 23 cm. On the contrary, at shallower incidences, they are highly affected by very low input coherence levels. Hence, they tend to overestimate vegetation height.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T06:26:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a38ce554ad814ae6b73ddf97b0df603f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2151-1535
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T06:26:20Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-a38ce554ad814ae6b73ddf97b0df603f2022-12-21T22:41:00ZengIEEEIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing2151-15352021-01-01147911793010.1109/JSTARS.2021.31008749502559A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and ChallengesNoelia Romero-Puig0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7661-7563Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-5175Institute for Computer Research, University of Alicante, Alicante, SpainInstitute for Computer Research, University of Alicante, Alicante, SpainThis article compares the performance of four different interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) techniques for the estimation of rice crop height by means of bistatic TanDEM-X data. Methods based on the interferometric phase alone, on the coherence amplitude alone, on the complex coherence value, and on polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR) are analyzed. Validation is conducted with reference data acquired over rice fields in Spain during the Science Phase of the TanDEM-X mission. Single- and dual-polarized data are exploited to also provide further insights into the polarization influence on these approaches. Vegetation height estimates from methodologies based on the interferometric phase show a general underestimation for the HH channel (with a bias that reaches around 25 cm in mid-July for some fields), whereas the VV channel is strongly influenced by noisy phases, especially at large incidences [root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 31 cm]. Results show that these approaches perform better at shallower incidences than the methodologies based on coherence amplitude and on PolInSAR, which obtain the most suitable results at steep incidences, with RMSE values of 17 and 23 cm. On the contrary, at shallower incidences, they are highly affected by very low input coherence levels. Hence, they tend to overestimate vegetation height.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9502559/Bistatic radarheightinterferometric SAR (InSAR)polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR)riceTanDEM-X
spellingShingle Noelia Romero-Puig
Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez
A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Bistatic radar
height
interferometric SAR (InSAR)
polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR)
rice
TanDEM-X
title A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges
title_full A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges
title_fullStr A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges
title_short A Review of Crop Height Retrieval Using InSAR Strategies: Techniques and Challenges
title_sort review of crop height retrieval using insar strategies techniques and challenges
topic Bistatic radar
height
interferometric SAR (InSAR)
polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR)
rice
TanDEM-X
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9502559/
work_keys_str_mv AT noeliaromeropuig areviewofcropheightretrievalusinginsarstrategiestechniquesandchallenges
AT juanmlopezsanchez areviewofcropheightretrievalusinginsarstrategiestechniquesandchallenges
AT noeliaromeropuig reviewofcropheightretrievalusinginsarstrategiestechniquesandchallenges
AT juanmlopezsanchez reviewofcropheightretrievalusinginsarstrategiestechniquesandchallenges