In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery

This retrospective cohort study compares the virtual planned and postoperative jaw positions in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Surgery was virtually planned with the Digital Münster Model Surgery system (DMMS). Primary outcome: Spatial difference in the maxillo-mandibulo relation between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Stamm, Eugenia Andriyuk, Johannes Kleinheinz, Susanne Jung, Dieter Dirksen, Claudius Middelberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/5/843
_version_ 1797498618076200960
author Thomas Stamm
Eugenia Andriyuk
Johannes Kleinheinz
Susanne Jung
Dieter Dirksen
Claudius Middelberg
author_facet Thomas Stamm
Eugenia Andriyuk
Johannes Kleinheinz
Susanne Jung
Dieter Dirksen
Claudius Middelberg
author_sort Thomas Stamm
collection DOAJ
description This retrospective cohort study compares the virtual planned and postoperative jaw positions in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Surgery was virtually planned with the Digital Münster Model Surgery system (DMMS). Primary outcome: Spatial difference in the maxillo-mandibulo relation between virtual planning and postoperative result. Secondary outcome: Possible relationship between the measured differences and surgical movements as well as the postoperative stability according to Proffit. Ninety female and sixty-one male patients were included in the study. The average translation errors were 0.54 ± 0.50 mm (anteroposterior), 0.37 ± 0.33 mm (mediolateral), and 0.33 ± 0.28 mm (superoinferior). Orientation errors were 0.86 ± 0.79 degrees (yaw), 0.54 ± 0.48 degrees (roll), and 0.90 ± 0.72 degrees (pitch). The surgical procedures do not differ with respect to their error sizes. Maxilla forward and class II maxilla up with mandible forward are the most precise procedures. Most significant differences were found in the anteroposterior direction, whereby the extent of the surgical movement has no effect on the magnitude of the error. The process of planning with the DMMS followed by surgery is highly accurate and shows error values well below the clinically accepted limit of two millimeters in translation and four degrees in rotation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:35:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a39340fe99e64bacb2d3aafcbaa0686c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:35:54Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a39340fe99e64bacb2d3aafcbaa0686c2023-11-23T11:45:41ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262022-05-0112584310.3390/jpm12050843In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic SurgeryThomas Stamm0Eugenia Andriyuk1Johannes Kleinheinz2Susanne Jung3Dieter Dirksen4Claudius Middelberg5Department of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, GermanyThis retrospective cohort study compares the virtual planned and postoperative jaw positions in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Surgery was virtually planned with the Digital Münster Model Surgery system (DMMS). Primary outcome: Spatial difference in the maxillo-mandibulo relation between virtual planning and postoperative result. Secondary outcome: Possible relationship between the measured differences and surgical movements as well as the postoperative stability according to Proffit. Ninety female and sixty-one male patients were included in the study. The average translation errors were 0.54 ± 0.50 mm (anteroposterior), 0.37 ± 0.33 mm (mediolateral), and 0.33 ± 0.28 mm (superoinferior). Orientation errors were 0.86 ± 0.79 degrees (yaw), 0.54 ± 0.48 degrees (roll), and 0.90 ± 0.72 degrees (pitch). The surgical procedures do not differ with respect to their error sizes. Maxilla forward and class II maxilla up with mandible forward are the most precise procedures. Most significant differences were found in the anteroposterior direction, whereby the extent of the surgical movement has no effect on the magnitude of the error. The process of planning with the DMMS followed by surgery is highly accurate and shows error values well below the clinically accepted limit of two millimeters in translation and four degrees in rotation.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/5/843orthognathic surgeryvirtual planningorthodontics
spellingShingle Thomas Stamm
Eugenia Andriyuk
Johannes Kleinheinz
Susanne Jung
Dieter Dirksen
Claudius Middelberg
In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery
Journal of Personalized Medicine
orthognathic surgery
virtual planning
orthodontics
title In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery
title_full In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery
title_fullStr In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery
title_short In Vivo Accuracy of a New Digital Planning System in Terms of Jaw Relation, Extent of Surgical Movements and the Hierarchy of Stability in Orthognathic Surgery
title_sort in vivo accuracy of a new digital planning system in terms of jaw relation extent of surgical movements and the hierarchy of stability in orthognathic surgery
topic orthognathic surgery
virtual planning
orthodontics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/5/843
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasstamm invivoaccuracyofanewdigitalplanningsystemintermsofjawrelationextentofsurgicalmovementsandthehierarchyofstabilityinorthognathicsurgery
AT eugeniaandriyuk invivoaccuracyofanewdigitalplanningsystemintermsofjawrelationextentofsurgicalmovementsandthehierarchyofstabilityinorthognathicsurgery
AT johanneskleinheinz invivoaccuracyofanewdigitalplanningsystemintermsofjawrelationextentofsurgicalmovementsandthehierarchyofstabilityinorthognathicsurgery
AT susannejung invivoaccuracyofanewdigitalplanningsystemintermsofjawrelationextentofsurgicalmovementsandthehierarchyofstabilityinorthognathicsurgery
AT dieterdirksen invivoaccuracyofanewdigitalplanningsystemintermsofjawrelationextentofsurgicalmovementsandthehierarchyofstabilityinorthognathicsurgery
AT claudiusmiddelberg invivoaccuracyofanewdigitalplanningsystemintermsofjawrelationextentofsurgicalmovementsandthehierarchyofstabilityinorthognathicsurgery