Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts

Patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models were used to evaluate the effectiveness of preclinical anticancer agents. A design using 1 mouse per patient per drug (1 × 1 × 1) was considered practical for large-scale drug efficacy studies. We evaluated modifiable parameters that could increase the st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Weiss, Nhu-An Pham, Melania Pintilie, Ming Li, Geoffrey Liu, Frances A Shepherd, Ming-Sound Tsao, Wei Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-11-01
Series:Cancer Informatics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/11769351221136056
_version_ 1828186267760721920
author Jessica Weiss
Nhu-An Pham
Melania Pintilie
Ming Li
Geoffrey Liu
Frances A Shepherd
Ming-Sound Tsao
Wei Xu
author_facet Jessica Weiss
Nhu-An Pham
Melania Pintilie
Ming Li
Geoffrey Liu
Frances A Shepherd
Ming-Sound Tsao
Wei Xu
author_sort Jessica Weiss
collection DOAJ
description Patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models were used to evaluate the effectiveness of preclinical anticancer agents. A design using 1 mouse per patient per drug (1 × 1 × 1) was considered practical for large-scale drug efficacy studies. We evaluated modifiable parameters that could increase the statistical power of this design based on our consolidated PDX experiments. Real studies were used as a reference to investigate the relationship between statistical power with treatment effect size, inter-mouse variation, and tumor measurement frequencies. Our results showed that large effect sizes could be detected at a significance level of .2 or .05 under a 1 × 1 × 1 design. We found that the minimum number of mice required to achieve 80% power at an alpha level of .05 under all situations explored was 21 mice per group for a small effect size and 5 mice per group for a medium effect size.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:16:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a39d203b5f3d46508161c69091c20787
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1176-9351
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:16:20Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Cancer Informatics
spelling doaj.art-a39d203b5f3d46508161c69091c207872022-12-22T03:42:27ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Informatics1176-93512022-11-012110.1177/11769351221136056Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor XenograftsJessica Weiss0Nhu-An Pham1Melania Pintilie2Ming Li3Geoffrey Liu4Frances A Shepherd5Ming-Sound Tsao6Wei Xu7Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, CanadaPatient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models were used to evaluate the effectiveness of preclinical anticancer agents. A design using 1 mouse per patient per drug (1 × 1 × 1) was considered practical for large-scale drug efficacy studies. We evaluated modifiable parameters that could increase the statistical power of this design based on our consolidated PDX experiments. Real studies were used as a reference to investigate the relationship between statistical power with treatment effect size, inter-mouse variation, and tumor measurement frequencies. Our results showed that large effect sizes could be detected at a significance level of .2 or .05 under a 1 × 1 × 1 design. We found that the minimum number of mice required to achieve 80% power at an alpha level of .05 under all situations explored was 21 mice per group for a small effect size and 5 mice per group for a medium effect size.https://doi.org/10.1177/11769351221136056
spellingShingle Jessica Weiss
Nhu-An Pham
Melania Pintilie
Ming Li
Geoffrey Liu
Frances A Shepherd
Ming-Sound Tsao
Wei Xu
Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts
Cancer Informatics
title Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts
title_full Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts
title_fullStr Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts
title_short Optimizing Drug Response Study Design in Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts
title_sort optimizing drug response study design in patient derived tumor xenografts
url https://doi.org/10.1177/11769351221136056
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicaweiss optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT nhuanpham optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT melaniapintilie optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT mingli optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT geoffreyliu optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT francesashepherd optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT mingsoundtsao optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts
AT weixu optimizingdrugresponsestudydesigninpatientderivedtumorxenografts