Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient

Abstract Continuous renal replacement techniques (CRRT) can induce complications and monitoring is crucial to ensure patient safety. We designed a prospective multicenter observational and descriptive study using the DIALYREG registry, an online database located on a REDCap web-based platform that a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. González-Fernández, N. Quílez-Trasobares, J. A. Barea-Mendoza, Z. Molina-Collado, D. Arias-Verdú, J. Barrueco-Francioni, G. Seller-Pérez, M. E. Herrera-Gutiérrez, J. A. Sánchez-Izquierdo Riera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32795-y
_version_ 1797841023044419584
author M. González-Fernández
N. Quílez-Trasobares
J. A. Barea-Mendoza
Z. Molina-Collado
D. Arias-Verdú
J. Barrueco-Francioni
G. Seller-Pérez
M. E. Herrera-Gutiérrez
J. A. Sánchez-Izquierdo Riera
author_facet M. González-Fernández
N. Quílez-Trasobares
J. A. Barea-Mendoza
Z. Molina-Collado
D. Arias-Verdú
J. Barrueco-Francioni
G. Seller-Pérez
M. E. Herrera-Gutiérrez
J. A. Sánchez-Izquierdo Riera
author_sort M. González-Fernández
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Continuous renal replacement techniques (CRRT) can induce complications and monitoring is crucial to ensure patient safety. We designed a prospective multicenter observational and descriptive study using the DIALYREG registry, an online database located on a REDCap web-based platform that allows real-time data analysis. Our main objective was to identify CRRT-related complications in our intensive care units (ICUs) and implement security measures accordingly. From January 2019 to December 2020, we included 323 patients with admission diagnoses of medical illness (54%), sepsis (24%), postoperative care (20%), and trauma (2%). CRRT indications were homeostasis (42%), oliguria (26%), fluid overload (15%), and hemodynamic optimization (13%). The median initial therapy dose was 30 ml/kg/h (IQR 25–40), and dynamic adjustment was performed in 61% of the treatments. Sets were anticoagulated with heparin (40%), citrate (38%) or no anticoagulation (22%). Citrate anticoagulation had several advantages: more frequent dynamic CRRT dose adjustment (77% vs. 58% with heparin and 56% without anticoagulation, p < 0.05), longer duration of set (median of 55 h, IQR 24–72 vs. 23 h, IQR 12–48 with heparin and 12 h, IQR 12–31 without anticoagulation, p < 0.05), less clotting of the set (26% vs. 46.7% with heparin, p < 0.05), and lower incidence of hypophosphatemia (1% citrate vs. 6% with heparin and 5% without anticoagulation). It was also safe and effective in subgroup analysis of patients with liver disease or sepsis. The main global complications were hypothermia (16%), hypophosphatemia (13%) and metabolic acidosis (10%). Weaning of the therapy was achieved through early discontinuation (56%), nocturnal therapy transition (26%) and progressive SLED (18%). 52% of the patients were discharged from the hospital, while 43% died in the ICU and 5% died during hospitalization. We can conclude that the DIALYREG registry is a feasible tool for real-time control of CRRT in our ICU.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:24:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3a4c4386ed74afaab30871043ed0391
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:24:09Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-a3a4c4386ed74afaab30871043ed03912023-04-23T11:17:43ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-04-011311710.1038/s41598-023-32795-yEvaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patientM. González-Fernández0N. Quílez-Trasobares1J. A. Barea-Mendoza2Z. Molina-Collado3D. Arias-Verdú4J. Barrueco-Francioni5G. Seller-Pérez6M. E. Herrera-Gutiérrez7J. A. Sánchez-Izquierdo Riera8Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital 12 de OctubreDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital 12 de OctubreDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital 12 de OctubreDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital 12 de OctubreDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Regional University Hospital of MalagaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Regional University Hospital of MalagaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Regional University Hospital of MalagaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Regional University Hospital of MalagaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital 12 de OctubreAbstract Continuous renal replacement techniques (CRRT) can induce complications and monitoring is crucial to ensure patient safety. We designed a prospective multicenter observational and descriptive study using the DIALYREG registry, an online database located on a REDCap web-based platform that allows real-time data analysis. Our main objective was to identify CRRT-related complications in our intensive care units (ICUs) and implement security measures accordingly. From January 2019 to December 2020, we included 323 patients with admission diagnoses of medical illness (54%), sepsis (24%), postoperative care (20%), and trauma (2%). CRRT indications were homeostasis (42%), oliguria (26%), fluid overload (15%), and hemodynamic optimization (13%). The median initial therapy dose was 30 ml/kg/h (IQR 25–40), and dynamic adjustment was performed in 61% of the treatments. Sets were anticoagulated with heparin (40%), citrate (38%) or no anticoagulation (22%). Citrate anticoagulation had several advantages: more frequent dynamic CRRT dose adjustment (77% vs. 58% with heparin and 56% without anticoagulation, p < 0.05), longer duration of set (median of 55 h, IQR 24–72 vs. 23 h, IQR 12–48 with heparin and 12 h, IQR 12–31 without anticoagulation, p < 0.05), less clotting of the set (26% vs. 46.7% with heparin, p < 0.05), and lower incidence of hypophosphatemia (1% citrate vs. 6% with heparin and 5% without anticoagulation). It was also safe and effective in subgroup analysis of patients with liver disease or sepsis. The main global complications were hypothermia (16%), hypophosphatemia (13%) and metabolic acidosis (10%). Weaning of the therapy was achieved through early discontinuation (56%), nocturnal therapy transition (26%) and progressive SLED (18%). 52% of the patients were discharged from the hospital, while 43% died in the ICU and 5% died during hospitalization. We can conclude that the DIALYREG registry is a feasible tool for real-time control of CRRT in our ICU.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32795-y
spellingShingle M. González-Fernández
N. Quílez-Trasobares
J. A. Barea-Mendoza
Z. Molina-Collado
D. Arias-Verdú
J. Barrueco-Francioni
G. Seller-Pérez
M. E. Herrera-Gutiérrez
J. A. Sánchez-Izquierdo Riera
Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
Scientific Reports
title Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
title_full Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
title_fullStr Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
title_short Evaluation of the registry DIALYREG for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
title_sort evaluation of the registry dialyreg for the assessment of continuous renal replacement techniques in the critically ill patient
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32795-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mgonzalezfernandez evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT nquileztrasobares evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT jabareamendoza evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT zmolinacollado evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT dariasverdu evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT jbarruecofrancioni evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT gsellerperez evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT meherreragutierrez evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient
AT jasanchezizquierdoriera evaluationoftheregistrydialyregfortheassessmentofcontinuousrenalreplacementtechniquesinthecriticallyillpatient