Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access

Previous studies have shown that exposure to circadian disruption produces negative effects on overall health and behavior. More recent studies illustrate that strain differences in the behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption exist, even if the strains have similar genetic bac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly M. Capri, Marissa J. Maroni, Hannah V. Deane, Holly A. Concepcion, Holly DeCourcey, Ryan W. Logan, Joseph A. Seggio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00268/full
_version_ 1811197780708818944
author Kimberly M. Capri
Kimberly M. Capri
Marissa J. Maroni
Marissa J. Maroni
Hannah V. Deane
Holly A. Concepcion
Holly DeCourcey
Ryan W. Logan
Ryan W. Logan
Joseph A. Seggio
author_facet Kimberly M. Capri
Kimberly M. Capri
Marissa J. Maroni
Marissa J. Maroni
Hannah V. Deane
Holly A. Concepcion
Holly DeCourcey
Ryan W. Logan
Ryan W. Logan
Joseph A. Seggio
author_sort Kimberly M. Capri
collection DOAJ
description Previous studies have shown that exposure to circadian disruption produces negative effects on overall health and behavior. More recent studies illustrate that strain differences in the behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption exist, even if the strains have similar genetic backgrounds. As such, we investigated the effects of constant room-level light (LL) with running-wheel access on the behavior and physiology of male C57BL6/J from Jackson Laboratories and C57BL6/N from Charles River Laboratories mice. Mice were exposed to either a 12:12 light-dark (LD) cycle or LL and given either a standard home cage or a cage with a running-wheel. Following 6 weeks of LD or LL, their response to behavioral assays (open-field, light-dark box, novel object) and measures of metabolism were observed. Under standard LD, C57BL6/J mice exhibited increased locomotor activity and reduced exploratory behavior compared to C57BL6/N mice. In LL, C57BL6/J mice had greater period lengthening and increased anxiety, while C57BL6/N mice exhibited increased weight gain and no change in exploratory behavior. C57BL6/J mice also decreased exploration with running-wheel access while C57BL6/N mice did not. These results further demonstrate that C57BL/6 substrains exhibit different behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption and wheel-running access.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:19:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3afb2f5061842b995480b52c8bd129a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:19:55Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-a3afb2f5061842b995480b52c8bd129a2022-12-22T03:53:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532019-12-011310.3389/fnbeh.2019.00268497935Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel AccessKimberly M. Capri0Kimberly M. Capri1Marissa J. Maroni2Marissa J. Maroni3Hannah V. Deane4Holly A. Concepcion5Holly DeCourcey6Ryan W. Logan7Ryan W. Logan8Joseph A. Seggio9Department of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United StatesDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United StatesPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United StatesTranslational Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United StatesCenter for Systems Neurogenetics of Addiction, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United StatesPrevious studies have shown that exposure to circadian disruption produces negative effects on overall health and behavior. More recent studies illustrate that strain differences in the behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption exist, even if the strains have similar genetic backgrounds. As such, we investigated the effects of constant room-level light (LL) with running-wheel access on the behavior and physiology of male C57BL6/J from Jackson Laboratories and C57BL6/N from Charles River Laboratories mice. Mice were exposed to either a 12:12 light-dark (LD) cycle or LL and given either a standard home cage or a cage with a running-wheel. Following 6 weeks of LD or LL, their response to behavioral assays (open-field, light-dark box, novel object) and measures of metabolism were observed. Under standard LD, C57BL6/J mice exhibited increased locomotor activity and reduced exploratory behavior compared to C57BL6/N mice. In LL, C57BL6/J mice had greater period lengthening and increased anxiety, while C57BL6/N mice exhibited increased weight gain and no change in exploratory behavior. C57BL6/J mice also decreased exploration with running-wheel access while C57BL6/N mice did not. These results further demonstrate that C57BL/6 substrains exhibit different behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption and wheel-running access.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00268/fullmouse modelcircadian rhythmstrain differencemiceconstant lightrunning wheel
spellingShingle Kimberly M. Capri
Kimberly M. Capri
Marissa J. Maroni
Marissa J. Maroni
Hannah V. Deane
Holly A. Concepcion
Holly DeCourcey
Ryan W. Logan
Ryan W. Logan
Joseph A. Seggio
Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
mouse model
circadian rhythm
strain difference
mice
constant light
running wheel
title Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access
title_full Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access
title_fullStr Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access
title_full_unstemmed Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access
title_short Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access
title_sort male c57bl6 n and c57bl6 j mice respond differently to constant light and running wheel access
topic mouse model
circadian rhythm
strain difference
mice
constant light
running wheel
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00268/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlymcapri malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT kimberlymcapri malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT marissajmaroni malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT marissajmaroni malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT hannahvdeane malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT hollyaconcepcion malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT hollydecourcey malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT ryanwlogan malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT ryanwlogan malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess
AT josephaseggio malec57bl6nandc57bl6jmiceresponddifferentlytoconstantlightandrunningwheelaccess