The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites

Background:. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA, Jacob C. Sorenson, BS, Ansab M. Khwaja, MD, Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-12-01
Series:JBJS Open Access
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087
_version_ 1797375058194202624
author Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA
Jacob C. Sorenson, BS
Ansab M. Khwaja, MD
Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA
author_facet Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA
Jacob C. Sorenson, BS
Ansab M. Khwaja, MD
Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA
author_sort Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program websites. Methods:. Existing orthopaedic surgery residency programs for the 2020 application cycle were identified on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) website. Individual program websites were accessed through links directly from the ERAS website, and a Google search for each program was performed to corroborate accessibility. Programs websites were then reviewed and evaluated on the presence of 20 criteria selected for their potential to influence resident recruitment (10) and education (10), respectively. The results were compared with the lone 2001 study and with orthopaedic fellowship website analyses. Results:. One hundred eighty-nine orthopaedic surgery residency programs were accredited at the time of the study. Only 6 programs (3.2%) did not have a website identifiable through ERAS or Google searches, leaving a final sample size of 183 websites. Approximately 73.3% of all recruitment content and 44.9% of education content were present on the websites available. There was a significant increase in all available recruitment and education content (p < 0.05) when compared with the lone 2001 study. Orthopaedic residency program websites provide comparable recruitment content at a higher rate (71.1%) than orthopaedic fellowship websites (59.6%) but fall slightly below average in presentation of education content (44.9% vs 45.9%). Conclusion:. This is the first study in nearly 20 years to assess the content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites. There is noticeable variability in the presentation of website content, but approximately 73.3% of recruitment content and 44.9% of the educational content were easily accessible through internet search. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs and their applicants may benefit from standardization of program websites and an increase in recruitment and education content.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3b6808bc1b1411cb1e83a8c3ce293f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-7245
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:44Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series JBJS Open Access
spelling doaj.art-a3b6808bc1b1411cb1e83a8c3ce293f52023-12-27T06:50:47ZengWolters KluwerJBJS Open Access2472-72452020-12-0154e20.00087e20.0008710.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087JBJSOA2000087The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program WebsitesNathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA0Jacob C. Sorenson, BS1Ansab M. Khwaja, MD2Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA31 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, ArizonaBackground:. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program websites. Methods:. Existing orthopaedic surgery residency programs for the 2020 application cycle were identified on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) website. Individual program websites were accessed through links directly from the ERAS website, and a Google search for each program was performed to corroborate accessibility. Programs websites were then reviewed and evaluated on the presence of 20 criteria selected for their potential to influence resident recruitment (10) and education (10), respectively. The results were compared with the lone 2001 study and with orthopaedic fellowship website analyses. Results:. One hundred eighty-nine orthopaedic surgery residency programs were accredited at the time of the study. Only 6 programs (3.2%) did not have a website identifiable through ERAS or Google searches, leaving a final sample size of 183 websites. Approximately 73.3% of all recruitment content and 44.9% of education content were present on the websites available. There was a significant increase in all available recruitment and education content (p < 0.05) when compared with the lone 2001 study. Orthopaedic residency program websites provide comparable recruitment content at a higher rate (71.1%) than orthopaedic fellowship websites (59.6%) but fall slightly below average in presentation of education content (44.9% vs 45.9%). Conclusion:. This is the first study in nearly 20 years to assess the content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites. There is noticeable variability in the presentation of website content, but approximately 73.3% of recruitment content and 44.9% of the educational content were easily accessible through internet search. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs and their applicants may benefit from standardization of program websites and an increase in recruitment and education content.http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087
spellingShingle Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA
Jacob C. Sorenson, BS
Ansab M. Khwaja, MD
Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA
The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
JBJS Open Access
title The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
title_full The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
title_fullStr The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
title_full_unstemmed The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
title_short The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
title_sort content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites
url http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087
work_keys_str_mv AT nathancshermanmdmba thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT jacobcsorensonbs thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT ansabmkhwajamd thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT gregoryldesilvamdfaoa thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT nathancshermanmdmba contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT jacobcsorensonbs contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT ansabmkhwajamd contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites
AT gregoryldesilvamdfaoa contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites