The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites
Background:. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program w...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020-12-01
|
Series: | JBJS Open Access |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087 |
_version_ | 1797375058194202624 |
---|---|
author | Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA Jacob C. Sorenson, BS Ansab M. Khwaja, MD Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA |
author_facet | Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA Jacob C. Sorenson, BS Ansab M. Khwaja, MD Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA |
author_sort | Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background:. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program websites.
Methods:. Existing orthopaedic surgery residency programs for the 2020 application cycle were identified on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) website. Individual program websites were accessed through links directly from the ERAS website, and a Google search for each program was performed to corroborate accessibility. Programs websites were then reviewed and evaluated on the presence of 20 criteria selected for their potential to influence resident recruitment (10) and education (10), respectively. The results were compared with the lone 2001 study and with orthopaedic fellowship website analyses.
Results:. One hundred eighty-nine orthopaedic surgery residency programs were accredited at the time of the study. Only 6 programs (3.2%) did not have a website identifiable through ERAS or Google searches, leaving a final sample size of 183 websites. Approximately 73.3% of all recruitment content and 44.9% of education content were present on the websites available. There was a significant increase in all available recruitment and education content (p < 0.05) when compared with the lone 2001 study. Orthopaedic residency program websites provide comparable recruitment content at a higher rate (71.1%) than orthopaedic fellowship websites (59.6%) but fall slightly below average in presentation of education content (44.9% vs 45.9%).
Conclusion:. This is the first study in nearly 20 years to assess the content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites. There is noticeable variability in the presentation of website content, but approximately 73.3% of recruitment content and 44.9% of the educational content were easily accessible through internet search. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs and their applicants may benefit from standardization of program websites and an increase in recruitment and education content. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:16:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a3b6808bc1b1411cb1e83a8c3ce293f5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2472-7245 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:16:44Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | Article |
series | JBJS Open Access |
spelling | doaj.art-a3b6808bc1b1411cb1e83a8c3ce293f52023-12-27T06:50:47ZengWolters KluwerJBJS Open Access2472-72452020-12-0154e20.00087e20.0008710.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087JBJSOA2000087The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program WebsitesNathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA0Jacob C. Sorenson, BS1Ansab M. Khwaja, MD2Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA31 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, ArizonaBackground:. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program websites. Methods:. Existing orthopaedic surgery residency programs for the 2020 application cycle were identified on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) website. Individual program websites were accessed through links directly from the ERAS website, and a Google search for each program was performed to corroborate accessibility. Programs websites were then reviewed and evaluated on the presence of 20 criteria selected for their potential to influence resident recruitment (10) and education (10), respectively. The results were compared with the lone 2001 study and with orthopaedic fellowship website analyses. Results:. One hundred eighty-nine orthopaedic surgery residency programs were accredited at the time of the study. Only 6 programs (3.2%) did not have a website identifiable through ERAS or Google searches, leaving a final sample size of 183 websites. Approximately 73.3% of all recruitment content and 44.9% of education content were present on the websites available. There was a significant increase in all available recruitment and education content (p < 0.05) when compared with the lone 2001 study. Orthopaedic residency program websites provide comparable recruitment content at a higher rate (71.1%) than orthopaedic fellowship websites (59.6%) but fall slightly below average in presentation of education content (44.9% vs 45.9%). Conclusion:. This is the first study in nearly 20 years to assess the content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites. There is noticeable variability in the presentation of website content, but approximately 73.3% of recruitment content and 44.9% of the educational content were easily accessible through internet search. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs and their applicants may benefit from standardization of program websites and an increase in recruitment and education content.http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087 |
spellingShingle | Nathan C. Sherman, MD, MBA Jacob C. Sorenson, BS Ansab M. Khwaja, MD Gregory L. DeSilva, MD, FAOA The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites JBJS Open Access |
title | The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites |
title_full | The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites |
title_fullStr | The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites |
title_full_unstemmed | The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites |
title_short | The Content and Accessibility of Orthopaedic Residency Program Websites |
title_sort | content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites |
url | http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nathancshermanmdmba thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT jacobcsorensonbs thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT ansabmkhwajamd thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT gregoryldesilvamdfaoa thecontentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT nathancshermanmdmba contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT jacobcsorensonbs contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT ansabmkhwajamd contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites AT gregoryldesilvamdfaoa contentandaccessibilityoforthopaedicresidencyprogramwebsites |