Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations

<b>Background & objectives:</b> The Balkans is an endemic region for Crimean-Congo <i>hemorrhagic</i> fever (CCHF), caused by the CCHF virus (CCHFV). Several Bulgarian regions comprised of smaller locations are categorized either as endemic or non-endemic for CCHF. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivanka Gergova, Bozhin Kamarinchev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/504265.pdf
_version_ 1828436299101503488
author Ivanka Gergova
Bozhin Kamarinchev
author_facet Ivanka Gergova
Bozhin Kamarinchev
author_sort Ivanka Gergova
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background & objectives:</b> The Balkans is an endemic region for Crimean-Congo <i>hemorrhagic</i> fever (CCHF), caused by the CCHF virus (CCHFV). Several Bulgarian regions comprised of smaller locations are categorized either as endemic or non-endemic for CCHF. However, little is known about the dynamics that underlie the development of endemicity within the locations throughout the years. <b>Methods:</b> Seven locations categorized as endemic in one central Bulgarian region (Stara Zagora) were compared to seven non-endemic areas. During the period 2006-12, a total of 1775 blood samples from cattle, were tested for anti-CCHFV antibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay. Also, the infestation of 617 mature ticks for CCHFV was studied using a combination of an immunofluorescence haemocytes assay and molecularvirological methods. <b>Results:</b> Anti-CCHFV antibodies were established in 7.89% (140/1775) of the sera. The average CCHFV-infestation in the ticks was 1.46% (9/617). CCHFV was detected in three tick species: <i>H.m. marginatum</i> (3.73%, 6/161), being the main vector of the infection; <i>R. sanguineus</i> (1.63%, 2/123); and <i>I. ricinus</i> (1.96%, 1/51). <b>Interpretation & conclusion:</b> The data for the endemic and non-endemic locations did not reveal significant differences for the prevalence of CCHFV. Mosaic dispersion of the virus was determined in the studied region and the results did not vary significantly throughout the investigated years.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:24:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3c99d04dfc84feaa76d30caaa5f887a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-9062
0972-9062
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:24:33Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
spelling doaj.art-a3c99d04dfc84feaa76d30caaa5f887a2022-12-22T01:36:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Vector Borne Diseases0972-90620972-90622013-12-01504265270Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locationsIvanka GergovaBozhin Kamarinchev<b>Background & objectives:</b> The Balkans is an endemic region for Crimean-Congo <i>hemorrhagic</i> fever (CCHF), caused by the CCHF virus (CCHFV). Several Bulgarian regions comprised of smaller locations are categorized either as endemic or non-endemic for CCHF. However, little is known about the dynamics that underlie the development of endemicity within the locations throughout the years. <b>Methods:</b> Seven locations categorized as endemic in one central Bulgarian region (Stara Zagora) were compared to seven non-endemic areas. During the period 2006-12, a total of 1775 blood samples from cattle, were tested for anti-CCHFV antibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay. Also, the infestation of 617 mature ticks for CCHFV was studied using a combination of an immunofluorescence haemocytes assay and molecularvirological methods. <b>Results:</b> Anti-CCHFV antibodies were established in 7.89% (140/1775) of the sera. The average CCHFV-infestation in the ticks was 1.46% (9/617). CCHFV was detected in three tick species: <i>H.m. marginatum</i> (3.73%, 6/161), being the main vector of the infection; <i>R. sanguineus</i> (1.63%, 2/123); and <i>I. ricinus</i> (1.96%, 1/51). <b>Interpretation & conclusion:</b> The data for the endemic and non-endemic locations did not reveal significant differences for the prevalence of CCHFV. Mosaic dispersion of the virus was determined in the studied region and the results did not vary significantly throughout the investigated years.http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/504265.pdfCattle; CCHFV; IFA; RT-PCR; tick
spellingShingle Ivanka Gergova
Bozhin Kamarinchev
Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations
Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
Cattle; CCHFV; IFA; RT-PCR; tick
title Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations
title_full Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations
title_fullStr Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations
title_short Comparison of the prevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non-endemic Bulgarian locations
title_sort comparison of the prevalence of crimean congo hemorrhagic fever virus in endemic and non endemic bulgarian locations
topic Cattle; CCHFV; IFA; RT-PCR; tick
url http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/504265.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ivankagergova comparisonoftheprevalenceofcrimeancongohemorrhagicfevervirusinendemicandnonendemicbulgarianlocations
AT bozhinkamarinchev comparisonoftheprevalenceofcrimeancongohemorrhagicfevervirusinendemicandnonendemicbulgarianlocations