Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring

Abstract Background Since clinical management of heart failure relies on weights that are self-reported by the patient, errors in reporting will negatively impact the ability of health care professionals to offer timely and effective preventive care. Errors might often result from rounding, or more...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Steventon, Sarwat I. Chaudhry, Zhenqiu Lin, Jennifer A. Mattera, Harlan M. Krumholz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-017-0426-4
_version_ 1819054160073457664
author Adam Steventon
Sarwat I. Chaudhry
Zhenqiu Lin
Jennifer A. Mattera
Harlan M. Krumholz
author_facet Adam Steventon
Sarwat I. Chaudhry
Zhenqiu Lin
Jennifer A. Mattera
Harlan M. Krumholz
author_sort Adam Steventon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Since clinical management of heart failure relies on weights that are self-reported by the patient, errors in reporting will negatively impact the ability of health care professionals to offer timely and effective preventive care. Errors might often result from rounding, or more generally from individual preferences for numbers ending in certain digits, such as 0 or 5. We apply fraud detection methods to assess preferences for numbers ending in these digits in order to inform medical decision making. Methods The Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes trial tested an approach to telemonitoring that used existing technology; intervention patients (n = 826) were asked to measure their weight daily using a digital scale and to relay measurements using their telephone keypads. First, we estimated the number of weights subject to end-digit preference by dividing the weights by five and comparing the resultant distribution with the uniform distribution. Then, we assessed the characteristics of patients reporting an excess number of weights ending in 0 or 5, adjusting for chance reporting of these values. Results Of the 114,867 weight readings reported during the trial, 18.6% were affected by end-digit preference, and the likelihood of these errors occurring increased with the number of days that had elapsed since trial enrolment (odds ratio per day: 1.002, p < 0.001). At least 105 patients demonstrated end-digit preference (14.9% of those who submitted data); although statistical significance was limited, a pattern emerged that, compared with other patients, they tended to be younger, male, high school graduates and on more medications. Patients with end-digit preference reported greater variability in weight, and they generated an average 2.9 alerts to the telemonitoring system over the six-month trial period (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.5), compared with 2.3 for other patients (95% CI, 2.2 to 2.5). Conclusions As well as overshadowing clinically meaningful changes in weight, end-digit preference can lead to false alerts to telemonitoring systems, which may be associated with unnecessary treatment and alert fatigue. In this trial, end-digit preference was common and became increasingly so over time. By applying fraud detection methods to electronic medical data, it is possible to produce clinically significant information that can inform the design of initiatives to improve the accuracy of reporting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00303212 March 2006.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:47:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3cb20dcab2946edaf314a9ec639f333
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6947
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:47:12Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-a3cb20dcab2946edaf314a9ec639f3332022-12-21T19:03:37ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472017-04-0117111310.1186/s12911-017-0426-4Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoringAdam Steventon0Sarwat I. Chaudhry1Zhenqiu Lin2Jennifer A. Mattera3Harlan M. Krumholz4Data Analytics, The Health FoundationYale School of MedicineCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of MedicineCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of MedicineCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of MedicineAbstract Background Since clinical management of heart failure relies on weights that are self-reported by the patient, errors in reporting will negatively impact the ability of health care professionals to offer timely and effective preventive care. Errors might often result from rounding, or more generally from individual preferences for numbers ending in certain digits, such as 0 or 5. We apply fraud detection methods to assess preferences for numbers ending in these digits in order to inform medical decision making. Methods The Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes trial tested an approach to telemonitoring that used existing technology; intervention patients (n = 826) were asked to measure their weight daily using a digital scale and to relay measurements using their telephone keypads. First, we estimated the number of weights subject to end-digit preference by dividing the weights by five and comparing the resultant distribution with the uniform distribution. Then, we assessed the characteristics of patients reporting an excess number of weights ending in 0 or 5, adjusting for chance reporting of these values. Results Of the 114,867 weight readings reported during the trial, 18.6% were affected by end-digit preference, and the likelihood of these errors occurring increased with the number of days that had elapsed since trial enrolment (odds ratio per day: 1.002, p < 0.001). At least 105 patients demonstrated end-digit preference (14.9% of those who submitted data); although statistical significance was limited, a pattern emerged that, compared with other patients, they tended to be younger, male, high school graduates and on more medications. Patients with end-digit preference reported greater variability in weight, and they generated an average 2.9 alerts to the telemonitoring system over the six-month trial period (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.5), compared with 2.3 for other patients (95% CI, 2.2 to 2.5). Conclusions As well as overshadowing clinically meaningful changes in weight, end-digit preference can lead to false alerts to telemonitoring systems, which may be associated with unnecessary treatment and alert fatigue. In this trial, end-digit preference was common and became increasingly so over time. By applying fraud detection methods to electronic medical data, it is possible to produce clinically significant information that can inform the design of initiatives to improve the accuracy of reporting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00303212 March 2006.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-017-0426-4TelemedicineEnd-digit preferenceSelf-reportAlert fatigue
spellingShingle Adam Steventon
Sarwat I. Chaudhry
Zhenqiu Lin
Jennifer A. Mattera
Harlan M. Krumholz
Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Telemedicine
End-digit preference
Self-report
Alert fatigue
title Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
title_full Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
title_fullStr Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
title_short Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
title_sort assessing the reliability of self reported weight for the management of heart failure application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring
topic Telemedicine
End-digit preference
Self-report
Alert fatigue
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-017-0426-4
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsteventon assessingthereliabilityofselfreportedweightforthemanagementofheartfailureapplicationoffrauddetectionmethodstoarandomisedtrialoftelemonitoring
AT sarwatichaudhry assessingthereliabilityofselfreportedweightforthemanagementofheartfailureapplicationoffrauddetectionmethodstoarandomisedtrialoftelemonitoring
AT zhenqiulin assessingthereliabilityofselfreportedweightforthemanagementofheartfailureapplicationoffrauddetectionmethodstoarandomisedtrialoftelemonitoring
AT jenniferamattera assessingthereliabilityofselfreportedweightforthemanagementofheartfailureapplicationoffrauddetectionmethodstoarandomisedtrialoftelemonitoring
AT harlanmkrumholz assessingthereliabilityofselfreportedweightforthemanagementofheartfailureapplicationoffrauddetectionmethodstoarandomisedtrialoftelemonitoring