A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka

In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sagara N. Kumara, Tim J. Parkinson, Richard A. Laven, Garry C. Waghorn, Anil Pushpakumara, Daniel J. Donaghy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/18/2391
_version_ 1797491972762501120
author Sagara N. Kumara
Tim J. Parkinson
Richard A. Laven
Garry C. Waghorn
Anil Pushpakumara
Daniel J. Donaghy
author_facet Sagara N. Kumara
Tim J. Parkinson
Richard A. Laven
Garry C. Waghorn
Anil Pushpakumara
Daniel J. Donaghy
author_sort Sagara N. Kumara
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to identify the feeds that were commonly used. All farms operated under a stall-feeding system in which a manually mixed ration (MMR) was fed 2–3 times daily. Four forages were identified: Guinea grass ecotype A (<i>Panicum maximum</i>), called Guinea grass; Hybrid Napier CO-3 (<i>Pennisetum purpureum</i> × <i>Pennisetum americanum</i>), called CO-3 grass; Gliricidia (<i>Gliricidia sepium</i>); and maize stover (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), along with three other supplementary feeds (maize silage, barley distillers’ by-products, and commercially formulated cattle feed). These feeds were subjected to proximate analysis and in vitro digestibility analysis. The metabolisable energy (ME) of the forages ranged from 7.5–10.0 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), with the ME of Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (7.5 and 8.0 MJ/kg DM, respectively) being lower than that of Gliricidia (10.0 MJ/kg DM). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) concentration of both Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (both 72% DM) was much higher than that of Gliricidia (47% DM). Crude protein (CP) was higher in Gliricidia (17.5% DM) than in either Guinea grass or CO-3 grass (8.0 and 8.8% DM, respectively). The ME of the supplementary feeds varied between 11.0 and 12.8 MJ/kg DM, while CP varied between 15.0 and 24.0% DM. The daily ME intake of cows was consistently 10% lower than their calculated daily energy requirement; for dry cows, the mean intake was 90 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 101 MJ required, while for cows in early lactation the mean intake was 126 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 140 MJ required. The average CP intake of lactating cows (13.5% DM) was inadequate (requirements: 16 to 17.5% DM), while the average CP intake of dry cows (11.8% DM) was satisfactory (requirements: 11 to 12% DM). The current study shows that the majority of the feed types used in these medium-scale dairy farms provide insufficient ME or CP to meet the nutritional requirements of either lactating or dry cows irrespective of the quantity of feed provided.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:56:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3d5560042e14e43be4785b0253a981a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:56:54Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-a3d5560042e14e43be4785b0253a981a2023-11-23T14:42:09ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-09-011218239110.3390/ani12182391A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri LankaSagara N. Kumara0Tim J. Parkinson1Richard A. Laven2Garry C. Waghorn3Anil Pushpakumara4Daniel J. Donaghy5School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4410, New ZealandSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New ZealandSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New ZealandSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4410, New ZealandDepartment of Farm Animal Production and Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri LankaSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4410, New ZealandIn this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to identify the feeds that were commonly used. All farms operated under a stall-feeding system in which a manually mixed ration (MMR) was fed 2–3 times daily. Four forages were identified: Guinea grass ecotype A (<i>Panicum maximum</i>), called Guinea grass; Hybrid Napier CO-3 (<i>Pennisetum purpureum</i> × <i>Pennisetum americanum</i>), called CO-3 grass; Gliricidia (<i>Gliricidia sepium</i>); and maize stover (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), along with three other supplementary feeds (maize silage, barley distillers’ by-products, and commercially formulated cattle feed). These feeds were subjected to proximate analysis and in vitro digestibility analysis. The metabolisable energy (ME) of the forages ranged from 7.5–10.0 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), with the ME of Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (7.5 and 8.0 MJ/kg DM, respectively) being lower than that of Gliricidia (10.0 MJ/kg DM). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) concentration of both Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (both 72% DM) was much higher than that of Gliricidia (47% DM). Crude protein (CP) was higher in Gliricidia (17.5% DM) than in either Guinea grass or CO-3 grass (8.0 and 8.8% DM, respectively). The ME of the supplementary feeds varied between 11.0 and 12.8 MJ/kg DM, while CP varied between 15.0 and 24.0% DM. The daily ME intake of cows was consistently 10% lower than their calculated daily energy requirement; for dry cows, the mean intake was 90 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 101 MJ required, while for cows in early lactation the mean intake was 126 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 140 MJ required. The average CP intake of lactating cows (13.5% DM) was inadequate (requirements: 16 to 17.5% DM), while the average CP intake of dry cows (11.8% DM) was satisfactory (requirements: 11 to 12% DM). The current study shows that the majority of the feed types used in these medium-scale dairy farms provide insufficient ME or CP to meet the nutritional requirements of either lactating or dry cows irrespective of the quantity of feed provided.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/18/2391cowsforagesenergyproteintropical dairy farming
spellingShingle Sagara N. Kumara
Tim J. Parkinson
Richard A. Laven
Garry C. Waghorn
Anil Pushpakumara
Daniel J. Donaghy
A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
Animals
cows
forages
energy
protein
tropical dairy farming
title A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
title_full A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
title_fullStr A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
title_short A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
title_sort nutritional investigation of major feed types and feed rations used in medium scale dairy production systems in sri lanka
topic cows
forages
energy
protein
tropical dairy farming
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/18/2391
work_keys_str_mv AT sagarankumara anutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT timjparkinson anutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT richardalaven anutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT garrycwaghorn anutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT anilpushpakumara anutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT danieljdonaghy anutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT sagarankumara nutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT timjparkinson nutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT richardalaven nutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT garrycwaghorn nutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT anilpushpakumara nutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka
AT danieljdonaghy nutritionalinvestigationofmajorfeedtypesandfeedrationsusedinmediumscaledairyproductionsystemsinsrilanka