مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل
Sources of The Normative Legal Maxim of Preferring between Application, Interpretation and Alteration This paper highlights the great importance associated to the normative legal maxim of preferring which comprise fundamentals of varying degrees in terms of influence. Some of which serve for the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
University of Oran2
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | Traduction et Langues |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revue.univ-oran2.dz/revuetranslang/index.php/translang/article/view/700 |
| _version_ | 1797739151692398592 |
|---|---|
| author | Salim Serrar |
| author_facet | Salim Serrar |
| author_sort | Salim Serrar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Sources of The Normative Legal Maxim of Preferring between Application, Interpretation and Alteration
This paper highlights the great importance associated to the normative legal maxim of preferring which comprise fundamentals of varying degrees in terms of influence. Some of which serve for the knowledge of certainty, some others assist the knowledge of reasoning in order to disambiguate the disagreement around controversial issues. This fact justifies the compulsory need to appeal to these foundational maxims to preserve the Islamic Sharia from interpretation and interpolation. The research revolves around the circle of jurisprudential controversies between the Sunni sects that are in agreement on the unity of the source in terms of ruling but through time and because of the prevalence of imitation bequeathed an imbalance in the facts, this necessitated to research the maxim of preferring, and to clarify its ruling and types and what has to do with its core. By extrapolating the history of legislation and examining the reality, it became clear that many of those engaged in jurisprudence began to meditate on the basis of approximate rules, which are not correct in the same matter, despite the disparity between them. The rule of preferring is of varying degrees in the strength and the benefit, some of them benefit from certain knowledge or close to that, and some of them benefit from theoretical inferential science, its purpose is to clarify the truth. So, the rule of preferring was a duty, in order to preserve the law of interpretation from distortion. After raising the different issues relevant to this topic, the researcher concluded that it is necessary to describe the rule of preferring in legitimacy and that this depends on its connection with the its applicability or interpreted sources, in addition to the obligation to conduct the scientific method of preferring that includes the revealed preferring and the interpreted preferring rather than the altered preferring. Just as the more correct one in the madhab does not have to be preponderant in the same matter, since the Shariah is broader than the madhhab in its texts, principles and purposes.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:53:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a3d6a549eb8c41cb94557c1202e4af75 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1112-3974 2600-6235 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:53:07Z |
| publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Oran2 |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Traduction et Langues |
| spelling | doaj.art-a3d6a549eb8c41cb94557c1202e4af752023-08-22T20:03:08ZdeuUniversity of Oran2Traduction et Langues1112-39742600-62352016-12-01152 مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديلSalim Serrar0 University of Oran1 Ahmed Ben Bella-Algeria Sources of The Normative Legal Maxim of Preferring between Application, Interpretation and Alteration This paper highlights the great importance associated to the normative legal maxim of preferring which comprise fundamentals of varying degrees in terms of influence. Some of which serve for the knowledge of certainty, some others assist the knowledge of reasoning in order to disambiguate the disagreement around controversial issues. This fact justifies the compulsory need to appeal to these foundational maxims to preserve the Islamic Sharia from interpretation and interpolation. The research revolves around the circle of jurisprudential controversies between the Sunni sects that are in agreement on the unity of the source in terms of ruling but through time and because of the prevalence of imitation bequeathed an imbalance in the facts, this necessitated to research the maxim of preferring, and to clarify its ruling and types and what has to do with its core. By extrapolating the history of legislation and examining the reality, it became clear that many of those engaged in jurisprudence began to meditate on the basis of approximate rules, which are not correct in the same matter, despite the disparity between them. The rule of preferring is of varying degrees in the strength and the benefit, some of them benefit from certain knowledge or close to that, and some of them benefit from theoretical inferential science, its purpose is to clarify the truth. So, the rule of preferring was a duty, in order to preserve the law of interpretation from distortion. After raising the different issues relevant to this topic, the researcher concluded that it is necessary to describe the rule of preferring in legitimacy and that this depends on its connection with the its applicability or interpreted sources, in addition to the obligation to conduct the scientific method of preferring that includes the revealed preferring and the interpreted preferring rather than the altered preferring. Just as the more correct one in the madhab does not have to be preponderant in the same matter, since the Shariah is broader than the madhhab in its texts, principles and purposes. https://revue.univ-oran2.dz/revuetranslang/index.php/translang/article/view/700the foundational maxim of preferring or giving preponderancecertaintythe knowledge of reasoninginterpretationalteration |
| spellingShingle | Salim Serrar مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل Traduction et Langues the foundational maxim of preferring or giving preponderance certainty the knowledge of reasoning interpretation alteration |
| title | مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل |
| title_full | مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل |
| title_fullStr | مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل |
| title_full_unstemmed | مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل |
| title_short | مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل |
| title_sort | مصادر قاعدة الترجيح بين التنزيل والتأويل والتبديل |
| topic | the foundational maxim of preferring or giving preponderance certainty the knowledge of reasoning interpretation alteration |
| url | https://revue.univ-oran2.dz/revuetranslang/index.php/translang/article/view/700 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT salimserrar mṣạdrqạʿdẗạltrjyḥbynạltnzylwạltạwylwạltbdyl |