Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks

Kathleen Putnam1, Everett F Magann2, Dorota A Doherty3, Aaron T Poole1, Marcia I Magann2, William B Warner1, Suneet P Chauhan41Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center – Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA; 2University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Roc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chauhan SP, Warner WB, Magann MI, Poole AT, Doherty DA, Magann EF, Putnam K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2011-08-01
Series:International Journal of Women's Health
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/randomized-clinical-trial-evaluating-the-frequency-of-membrane-sweepin-a8114
_version_ 1818557526678962176
author Chauhan SP
Warner WB
Magann MI
Poole AT
Doherty DA
Magann EF
Putnam K
author_facet Chauhan SP
Warner WB
Magann MI
Poole AT
Doherty DA
Magann EF
Putnam K
author_sort Chauhan SP
collection DOAJ
description Kathleen Putnam1, Everett F Magann2, Dorota A Doherty3, Aaron T Poole1, Marcia I Magann2, William B Warner1, Suneet P Chauhan41Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center – Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA; 2University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; 3School of Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; 4Aurora Healthcare, West Allis, Wisconsin, USABackground: Despite the widely accepted use of membrane sweeping to prevent postmaturity pregnancies, the optimal frequency for this procedure has not been established.Aim: To determine if the frequency of membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at term results in fewer labor inductions.Methods: This was a randomized trial of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop's score of ≤4) at 39 weeks randomized into three groups: control, once-weekly membrane sweeping, and twice-weekly membrane sweeping.Results: Between January 2005 and June 2008, 350 women were randomized into the study (groups: control [n = 116], once weekly[n = 117], and twice weekly [n = 117]). Randomization of Bishop's score was different between groups (P = 0.019), with 67%, 71%, and 83% of control, once-, and twice-weekly groups, respectively, having scores of 3–4. There was no difference in the unadjusted rate of labor induction between the groups (35% versus 27% versus 23%, P = 0.149), and after the adjustment for the randomization of Bishop's score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.29 and OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.36–1.18 for once- and twice-weekly groups, respectively). A Bishop's score of 3–4 at randomization was the only statistically significant factor that decreased the likelihood of induction at 41 weeks (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.69).Conclusion: Frequency of membrane sweeping does not influence the likelihood of remaining undelivered at 41 weeks of pregnancy. The Bishop's score at around 39 weeks is the important factor as a predictor of the duration of pregnancy, and further studies would be required to determine whether membrane sweeping influences pregnancy duration.Keywords: labor induction, postmaturity pregnancy, Bishop's score, pregnancy duration
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:00:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3dba7c2b9a547ae98863db1778a24ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1411
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:00:40Z
publishDate 2011-08-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series International Journal of Women's Health
spelling doaj.art-a3dba7c2b9a547ae98863db1778a24ca2022-12-21T23:26:22ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of Women's Health1179-14112011-08-012011default287294Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeksChauhan SPWarner WBMagann MIPoole ATDoherty DAMagann EFPutnam KKathleen Putnam1, Everett F Magann2, Dorota A Doherty3, Aaron T Poole1, Marcia I Magann2, William B Warner1, Suneet P Chauhan41Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center – Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA; 2University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; 3School of Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; 4Aurora Healthcare, West Allis, Wisconsin, USABackground: Despite the widely accepted use of membrane sweeping to prevent postmaturity pregnancies, the optimal frequency for this procedure has not been established.Aim: To determine if the frequency of membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at term results in fewer labor inductions.Methods: This was a randomized trial of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop's score of ≤4) at 39 weeks randomized into three groups: control, once-weekly membrane sweeping, and twice-weekly membrane sweeping.Results: Between January 2005 and June 2008, 350 women were randomized into the study (groups: control [n = 116], once weekly[n = 117], and twice weekly [n = 117]). Randomization of Bishop's score was different between groups (P = 0.019), with 67%, 71%, and 83% of control, once-, and twice-weekly groups, respectively, having scores of 3–4. There was no difference in the unadjusted rate of labor induction between the groups (35% versus 27% versus 23%, P = 0.149), and after the adjustment for the randomization of Bishop's score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.29 and OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.36–1.18 for once- and twice-weekly groups, respectively). A Bishop's score of 3–4 at randomization was the only statistically significant factor that decreased the likelihood of induction at 41 weeks (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.69).Conclusion: Frequency of membrane sweeping does not influence the likelihood of remaining undelivered at 41 weeks of pregnancy. The Bishop's score at around 39 weeks is the important factor as a predictor of the duration of pregnancy, and further studies would be required to determine whether membrane sweeping influences pregnancy duration.Keywords: labor induction, postmaturity pregnancy, Bishop's score, pregnancy durationhttp://www.dovepress.com/randomized-clinical-trial-evaluating-the-frequency-of-membrane-sweepin-a8114
spellingShingle Chauhan SP
Warner WB
Magann MI
Poole AT
Doherty DA
Magann EF
Putnam K
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
International Journal of Women's Health
title Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_full Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_fullStr Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_full_unstemmed Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_short Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_sort randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
url http://www.dovepress.com/randomized-clinical-trial-evaluating-the-frequency-of-membrane-sweepin-a8114
work_keys_str_mv AT chauhansp randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT warnerwb randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT magannmi randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT pooleat randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT dohertyda randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT magannef randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT putnamk randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks