Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.

PURPOSE:Ocular somatosensory-autonomic reflexes play critical roles in maintaining homeostasis of the eye. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pupil response to nociceptive corneal stimuli. METHODS:A Waterloo-Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer was used to determine detection thresholds an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanuel B Alabi, Trefford L Simpson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227771
_version_ 1818678172542042112
author Emmanuel B Alabi
Trefford L Simpson
author_facet Emmanuel B Alabi
Trefford L Simpson
author_sort Emmanuel B Alabi
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE:Ocular somatosensory-autonomic reflexes play critical roles in maintaining homeostasis of the eye. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pupil response to nociceptive corneal stimuli. METHODS:A Waterloo-Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer was used to determine detection thresholds and randomly deliver mechanical and chemical stimuli from levels of detection threshold to twice the threshold in 50% steps to the central cornea of 15 healthy subjects. For each stimulus, imaging of the stimulated/unstimulated eye was performed using two modified/calibrated Logitech c920 digital cameras for 4 seconds each, pre/post stimulus capture. The data were processed with a custom segmentation algorithm to help identify the pupils and pupil diameter was measured using ImageJ software. Pupil dilation response differences between the ipsi- and contralateral eye was analyzed using dependent t-tests. The effect of stimulus intensity, modality and sex of subjects were analyzed using repeated measures. RESULTS:In mechanical and chemical stimulation experiments, there was no difference in pupil responses between the stimulated eye and the unstimulated eye, (all dependent T-test p > 0.05). On average, pupil diameter increased from baseline as the corneal stimulus intensity increased. This happened regardless of whether mechanical or chemical stimulation occurred (ANOVA p < 0.05). At 200% threshold, pupil diameter was greater than at all stimulus intensities (Tukey HSD, all p < 0.05). Based on stimulus intensity, females had greater pupil diameters than males at levels of 150% threshold and 200% threshold (ANOVA p < 0.05, all Tukey HSD p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:This study serves as a basis for the characterization of the local stimulus-response neural circuitry relating nociceptive stimuli to autonomic responses and in combination with our work on completely separate autonomic circuits of bulbar conjunctival vessel dilation and reflex tearing suggests that the monotonic measurements of redness, tearing and pupils provide accurate, separable responses that reflect painful stimulus intensity.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T09:11:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3e3db97313543648d8335bafe3862fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T09:11:02Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-a3e3db97313543648d8335bafe3862fd2022-12-21T21:55:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022777110.1371/journal.pone.0227771Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.Emmanuel B AlabiTrefford L SimpsonPURPOSE:Ocular somatosensory-autonomic reflexes play critical roles in maintaining homeostasis of the eye. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pupil response to nociceptive corneal stimuli. METHODS:A Waterloo-Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer was used to determine detection thresholds and randomly deliver mechanical and chemical stimuli from levels of detection threshold to twice the threshold in 50% steps to the central cornea of 15 healthy subjects. For each stimulus, imaging of the stimulated/unstimulated eye was performed using two modified/calibrated Logitech c920 digital cameras for 4 seconds each, pre/post stimulus capture. The data were processed with a custom segmentation algorithm to help identify the pupils and pupil diameter was measured using ImageJ software. Pupil dilation response differences between the ipsi- and contralateral eye was analyzed using dependent t-tests. The effect of stimulus intensity, modality and sex of subjects were analyzed using repeated measures. RESULTS:In mechanical and chemical stimulation experiments, there was no difference in pupil responses between the stimulated eye and the unstimulated eye, (all dependent T-test p > 0.05). On average, pupil diameter increased from baseline as the corneal stimulus intensity increased. This happened regardless of whether mechanical or chemical stimulation occurred (ANOVA p < 0.05). At 200% threshold, pupil diameter was greater than at all stimulus intensities (Tukey HSD, all p < 0.05). Based on stimulus intensity, females had greater pupil diameters than males at levels of 150% threshold and 200% threshold (ANOVA p < 0.05, all Tukey HSD p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:This study serves as a basis for the characterization of the local stimulus-response neural circuitry relating nociceptive stimuli to autonomic responses and in combination with our work on completely separate autonomic circuits of bulbar conjunctival vessel dilation and reflex tearing suggests that the monotonic measurements of redness, tearing and pupils provide accurate, separable responses that reflect painful stimulus intensity.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227771
spellingShingle Emmanuel B Alabi
Trefford L Simpson
Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.
PLoS ONE
title Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.
title_full Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.
title_fullStr Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.
title_full_unstemmed Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.
title_short Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.
title_sort pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227771
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuelbalabi pupilresponsetonoxiouscornealstimulation
AT treffordlsimpson pupilresponsetonoxiouscornealstimulation