Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving

As anthropogenic climate change progresses, there is an increasing need for individuals to make appropriate decisions regarding their approach to extreme weather events. Natural hazards are involuntary risk environments (e.g., flooded roads); interaction with them cannot be avoided (i.e., a decision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shauntelle Benjamin, Melissa Parsons, Deborah Apthorp, Amy D. Lykins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913790/full
_version_ 1811295422193336320
author Shauntelle Benjamin
Shauntelle Benjamin
Melissa Parsons
Melissa Parsons
Deborah Apthorp
Deborah Apthorp
Amy D. Lykins
author_facet Shauntelle Benjamin
Shauntelle Benjamin
Melissa Parsons
Melissa Parsons
Deborah Apthorp
Deborah Apthorp
Amy D. Lykins
author_sort Shauntelle Benjamin
collection DOAJ
description As anthropogenic climate change progresses, there is an increasing need for individuals to make appropriate decisions regarding their approach to extreme weather events. Natural hazards are involuntary risk environments (e.g., flooded roads); interaction with them cannot be avoided (i.e., a decision must be made about how to engage). While the psychological and sociocultural predictors of engagement with voluntary risks (i.e., risk situations that are sought out) are well-documented, less is known about the factors that predict engagement with involuntary risk environments. This exploratory study assessed whether mental health (depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms), personality traits, and cultural worldviews combine to predict engagement with involuntary risk, using the situation of floodwater driving. An Australian sample (N = 235) was assessed via questionnaire and scenario measures. Results were analyzed in a binomial logistic regression assessing which individual factors predicted decision-making in a proxy floodwater driving scenario. Agreeableness and gender were individually significant predictors of floodwater driving intention, and four factors (named “affect,” “progressiveness,” “insightfulness,” and “purposefulness”) were derived from an exploratory factor analysis using the variables of interest, though only two (“progressiveness” and “insightfulness”) predicted floodwater driving intention in an exploratory binomial logistic regression. The findings highlight the need for further research into the differences between voluntary and involuntary risk. The implication of cultural worldviews and personality traits in interaction with mental health indicators on risk situations is discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:32:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a3ee04e297b04b4b991ee54698814d1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:32:18Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-a3ee04e297b04b4b991ee54698814d1b2022-12-22T03:00:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-07-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.913790913790Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater drivingShauntelle Benjamin0Shauntelle Benjamin1Melissa Parsons2Melissa Parsons3Deborah Apthorp4Deborah Apthorp5Amy D. Lykins6School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, AustraliaBushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaBushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Computing, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, AustraliaAs anthropogenic climate change progresses, there is an increasing need for individuals to make appropriate decisions regarding their approach to extreme weather events. Natural hazards are involuntary risk environments (e.g., flooded roads); interaction with them cannot be avoided (i.e., a decision must be made about how to engage). While the psychological and sociocultural predictors of engagement with voluntary risks (i.e., risk situations that are sought out) are well-documented, less is known about the factors that predict engagement with involuntary risk environments. This exploratory study assessed whether mental health (depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms), personality traits, and cultural worldviews combine to predict engagement with involuntary risk, using the situation of floodwater driving. An Australian sample (N = 235) was assessed via questionnaire and scenario measures. Results were analyzed in a binomial logistic regression assessing which individual factors predicted decision-making in a proxy floodwater driving scenario. Agreeableness and gender were individually significant predictors of floodwater driving intention, and four factors (named “affect,” “progressiveness,” “insightfulness,” and “purposefulness”) were derived from an exploratory factor analysis using the variables of interest, though only two (“progressiveness” and “insightfulness”) predicted floodwater driving intention in an exploratory binomial logistic regression. The findings highlight the need for further research into the differences between voluntary and involuntary risk. The implication of cultural worldviews and personality traits in interaction with mental health indicators on risk situations is discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913790/fullpersonality traitscultural worldviewsfloodwater drivingrisk-taking behaviormood states
spellingShingle Shauntelle Benjamin
Shauntelle Benjamin
Melissa Parsons
Melissa Parsons
Deborah Apthorp
Deborah Apthorp
Amy D. Lykins
Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
Frontiers in Psychology
personality traits
cultural worldviews
floodwater driving
risk-taking behavior
mood states
title Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
title_full Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
title_fullStr Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
title_full_unstemmed Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
title_short Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
title_sort why take the risk exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving
topic personality traits
cultural worldviews
floodwater driving
risk-taking behavior
mood states
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913790/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shauntellebenjamin whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving
AT shauntellebenjamin whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving
AT melissaparsons whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving
AT melissaparsons whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving
AT deborahapthorp whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving
AT deborahapthorp whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving
AT amydlykins whytaketheriskexploringthepsychosocialdeterminantsoffloodwaterdriving