Correction: Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214279.].
Main Authors: | Jung-Ro Yoon, Ji-Young Cheong, Jung-Taek Im, Phil-Sun Park, Jae-Ok Park, Young-Soo Shin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216004 |
Similar Items
-
Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
by: Jung-Ro Yoon, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Condylar constrained knee prosthesis and rotating hinge prosthesis for revision total knee arthroplasty for mechanical failure have not the same indications and same results
by: Barnoud William, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge implant: an option for complex primary cases and revisions
by: Camilo Partezani Helito, et al. -
Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years
by: Jake von Hintze, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty among Different Etiologies and Treated with a Condylar Constrained Knee Implant Supported with Cones
by: Eugenio Jannelli, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)